Except the debate here isnt about the consitution, is it? It's about "awww he suffered". Not "It was wrong he suffered because the law says he shouldnt". It's a different issue.
We SHOULD follow the constitution. Absolutely. I do think, as others have stated, that there is room for debate over what is cruel and unusual. I'd argue that life in prison is cruel and unusual.....but what's the alternative? Let's think about this. Terrible food. Horrible environment. Threat of violence and rape constantly. No members of the opposite sex again, ever.
That's TERRIBLE, really. But we arent worried about THAT, are we? No, because we take the attitude of "well then dont be a criminal if you dont want that." But somehow, suffering for a few minutes is cruel and unusual? MOreso than being stripped of not only freedom but of sex, of decent food, of in many cases basic human contact?
Dont lecture me about the constitution. If we're gonna follow it then let's friggin follow it. And if that;s the case then as far as I am concerned all the people calling for lifetime imprisonment are just as sadistic as many claim that death penalty supporters are.