It Looks Like Trump is Gearing up for a Presidential Run (2024).

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,334
5,487
136
Lol people in the party are actually thinking he should announce sooner now.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,334
5,487
136
Of course he calls it a witch hunt as excuse on why he’s pleading the 5th
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
It could rally supporters who would have otherwise stayed at home. With that said, it might only have a limited effect. It'll only really help Trumpist candidates in the midterms... and a lot could happen to Trump by 2024. May be difficult for him to enjoy an outrage boost if he's in prison.


By the time 2024 rolls around most folks will have forgotten all about this incident on both side of the aisle.

The effect on the mid-terms is tough to predict right now with any certainty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lezunto

Lezunto

Golden Member
Oct 24, 2020
1,070
968
106
I also believe we on the Left are damaging ourselves with all these public predictions about Joe Biden doing this or Joe Biden too old for that.

Too many have come forward to just bury Joe Biden. While he is older, he's not a liar or a wanna-be dictator like Trump.

Biden will make up his own mind. He does not have to keep Kamala as his running mate.

If he wants to, then he needs to make sure she gets a lot more public speaking opportunities. Because she's practically invisible to the world. I know she's important behind the scenes in our eyes.

Personally, I think she needs to be showcased more.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,266
136
I also believe we on the Left are damaging ourselves with all these public predictions about Joe Biden doing this or Joe Biden too old for that.

Too many have come forward to just bury Joe Biden. While he is older, he's not a liar or a wanna-be dictator like Trump.

Biden will make up his own mind. He does not have to keep Kamala as his running mate.

If he wants to, then he needs to make sure she gets a lot more public speaking opportunities. Because she's practically invisible to the world. I know she's important behind the scenes in our eyes.

Personally, I think she needs to be showcased more.
I really lost any zeal for Joe with the flat footed response to the Roe vs Wade decision at the admin level. I think I was really upset at the time and said I could no longer support Joe. With the recent successes in legislation, and the fact I can't think of alternate person in the Democratic party that could fit in the demographic that could defeat a Republican candidate at this point, I'm staying with Joe. We need a united front going into these mid-terms. The Kansas vote, has told me that women are not going to take this shit lying down, and has been a gift to the Dems running in the mid terms.
Go Joe!
 

Lezunto

Golden Member
Oct 24, 2020
1,070
968
106
I strongly believe women's health issues should be decided by women, but whatever they decide is fine by me.

I am heartened by the vote in Kansas. All of us need to be, too.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,345
19,495
146
Every time I see this thread has been bumped I think, "oh fuck, he did it..." Only to be relieved he hasn't yet.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,273
12,837
136
Joe Biden is a good man and if he's ultimately the Democratic nominee (a near-certainty historically) in 2024 I will absolutely vote for him.

However I still believe that he's too old for a second term despite recent successes.
I agree 100%. Not a huge Biden fan per se, but he's a good human being and generally does want to do some good for the country, even if I don't agree with him on every policy position. I sure would like him to be more progressive, but I get the political reality that you need some amount of "independent" voters who lean conservative, especially since it's all too easy for the rest of the right wing to yell communism/CRT/etc and scare white suburbanites into voting for shitty R candidates.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
You know how I keep saying that Trump can be banned from office under the 14th amendment, which specifies that anyone who has "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" cannot hold public office?

Well, that clause has never before been invoked, until today. When this guy was removed from his position as a county commissioner in NM by order of the court. Because he participated in the insurrection on 1/6.


Any special reason this clause should apply to one who physically stormed the capital but not the man who organized and encouraged it?
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,334
5,487
136
Any special reason this clause should apply to one who physically stormed the capital but not the man who organized and encouraged it?
That’s what I don’t get. What’s the difference between the ban from this amendment to if he gets convicted for violation to the PRA and to if impeachment and removal happen. There’s always the argument that the constitution only has requirement that one is born in the US and over 37. Anything else is a violation to their rights.
 

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
12,057
2,272
126
Any special reason this clause should apply to one who physically stormed the capital but not the man who organized and encouraged it?
He's special, that's why. The odds of Trump facing any substantial punishment for all his multiple crimes are pretty slim IMO, considering the two-tiered justice system. I hope I'm wrong of course.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
That’s what I don’t get. What’s the difference between the ban from this amendment to if he gets convicted for violation to the PRA and to if impeachment and removal happen. There’s always the argument that the constitution only has requirement that one is born in the US and over 37. Anything else is a violation to their rights.

That is a non-argument, since this clause is contained in an Amendment to the Constitution. An Amendment to the Constitution cannot be unconstititional by definition.

So far as what is the difference between this and a criminal conviction - the latter does not bar you from holding office.

There would of course have to be a judicial determination before this could happen. Which is why during Trump's impeachment trial the dems considered whether they could get enough repugs to agree to a finding that Trump engaged in insurrection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lezunto