Originally posted by: Duwelon
If Obama's stance on Israel is in line with Bush's, I'd welcome him to go on the record with it. He would give comfort to Israeli's, letting them know the next US President is behind their defense. Is there any reason for Obama not to state his support of Israel right now?
You don't have the information Obama and his team do, and it's not your decision to make. I wouldn't be suprised if Obama and his team are staying relatively quiet with the full approval of and cooperation with the Bush admin.
Of course, I don't know, either, but Obama will be sworn in in a few weeks. THEN will be the appropriate time for him to speak for his administration.
Originally posted by: Craig234
Does that "Hamas declares the destruction of Hamas" issue give Israel carte blanche to obliterate as much of the Gaza strip rules by Hamas as they like, though?
Hardly. I think you meant "Hamas declares the destruction of Israel," but in my next paragraph, I said:
Anyone who engages in war is responsible to themselves and the world to be justified in doing so...
For that matter, did the Clinton/Bush policy of wanting 'regime change' in Iraq constitute an 'act of war' against Saddam that actually gave him justification for attacking the US?
Before Bush actually started his illegal invasion, Saddam was already under internationally approved trade and other sanctions that included the "no fly" zones in the north and south. He may have regarded those sanctions as as justification to attack the U.S. and wished he could, but he'd have a hard time with the second criterion of being able to gain the support of many other nations if he did.