Do losers of wars get to set the terms of resettlement? The two state solution is no solution at all.
So our Israeli friends have been lying to us all along?
Do losers of wars get to set the terms of resettlement? The two state solution is no solution at all.
Yes, assuming they are willing to concede certain grievances of their own making and as the loser of previous futile attempts at armed conflict.You didn't answer my question. Do they even have any options for liberation through peaceful means at this point?
Lied about what? I think they’ve appeased a bunch of BS so that American Presidents can claim they’ve “solved” the Middle East dilemma.So our Israeli friends have been lying to us all along?
Lied about what? I think they’ve appeased a bunch of BS so that American Presidents can claim they’ve “solved” the Middle East dilemma.
Plane is probably most efficient, boat if she likes cruises
I answered the question in the spirit of how it was introduced.I'm not sure how serious you are being with this reply. I'm not sure if you are aware that Israel controls the checkpoints into Palestine. So in order for her to visit her family, she needs PERMISSION from Israel.
I believe I already acknowledged that they’ve humored a solution that is no solution at all while pursuing a strategy based more on necessity given the tendency of their neighbors to use violence as the default negotiating tactic.Israel's public stance on the issue has been for decades that it supported the two-state solution while actively building illegal settlements that would render the two-state solution difficult or impossible. There is no chance this was by accident.
I believe I already acknowledged that they’ve humored a solution that is no solution at all while pursuing a strategy based more on necessity given the tendency of their neighbors to use violence as the default negotiating tactic.
Israel's public stance on the issue has been for decades that it supported the two-state solution while actively building illegal settlements that would render the two-state solution difficult or impossible. There is no chance this was by accident.
Concede certain grievances like what? The ability to live freely on their own lands?Yes, assuming they are willing to concede certain grievances of their own making and as the loser of previous futile attempts at armed conflict.
Yeah, because holding millions of people behind walls and shooting them if they try to get out isn't violent at all.I believe I already acknowledged that they’ve humored a solution that is no solution at all while pursuing a strategy based more on necessity given the tendency of their neighbors to use violence as the default negotiating tactic.
I believe I already acknowledged that they’ve humored a solution that is no solution at all while pursuing a strategy based more on necessity given the tendency of their neighbors to use violence as the default negotiating tactic.
Hence the folly and failure of an international governing body in its attempts to solve complex global issues.The last time any of their neighbors actually warred against Israel was 1973. Their neighbors didn't start the shooting in 1982, 1967, 1956 or 1947, for that matter. As far as most of America is concerned, they can get away with damned near anything because Jews were victims of Hitler's mass murder 80 years ago. Poor Jews! OTOH, it's not like we wanted them coming here at the time, so let's give them their own country! Problem solved!
When the people behind those walls do not recognize your right to exist and declare Intifada’s against you, its an unfortunate but necessary response.Yeah, because holding millions of people behind walls and shooting them if they try to get out isn't violent at all.
Hence the folly and failure of an international governing body in its attempts to solve complex global issues.
Also, you forgot to mention the Palestinian intifada’s which extend hostilities into the current decade.
You don't even know what the word means-When the people behind those walls do not recognize your right to exist and declare Intifada’s against you, its an unfortunate but necessary response.
People will tend to put their boot to your neck after blocking your sucker punch.People will tend to struggle when you have your boot on their neck, no doubt.
The word is irrelevant. The intent is a call to violence. Careful @Jhhnn, you’re starting to sound like a Proud Boys apologist.You don't even know what the word means-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intifada
People will tend to put their boot to your neck after blocking your sucker punch.
The word is irrelevant. The intent is a call to violence. Careful @Jhhnn, you’re starting to sound like a Proud Boys apologist.
Yeah, you're still struggling with the issue of that negative feedback loop. And should we care only about Israel's right to exist, and never about anyone else's?When the people behind those walls do not recognize your right to exist and declare Intifada’s against you, its an unfortunate but necessary response.
There seems to be a large number of people who still believe that Israel's ability to exist is still in doubt. As opposed to the reality that Israel won the war a long time ago and is now treating the Palestinians the way conquerors have treated the conquered throughout all of human history.Yeah, the Israelis do play the victim card for all it's worth. Imagine how we'd feel if they weren't Jewish.
And you’re struggling with the concept of cause and effectYeah, you're still struggling with the issue of that negative feedback loop. And should we care only about Israel's right to exist, and never about anyone else's?
No, I get that just fine, otherwise I wouldn't be pointing out the feedback loop. You agree that the Palestinians are not being allowed a recourse to freedom through peaceful means, but then use that as an excuse to continue denying them a recourse to freedom through peaceful means. Surely you see the problem, yes?And you’re struggling with the concept of cause and effect
No, I get that just fine, otherwise I wouldn't be pointing out the feedback loop. You agree that the Palestinians are not being allowed a recourse to freedom through peaceful means, but then use that as an excuse to continue denying them a recourse to freedom through peaceful means. Surely you see the problem, yes?
Recourse through peaceful means assumes a genuine attempt at a peaceful resolution, which is hard to achieve when you refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the entity holding all the cards.No, I get that just fine, otherwise I wouldn't be pointing out the feedback loop. You agree that the Palestinians are not being allowed a recourse to freedom through peaceful means, but then use that as an excuse to continue denying them a recourse to freedom through peaceful means. Surely you see the problem, yes?
Recourse through peaceful means assumes a genuine attempt at a peaceful resolution, which is hard to achieve when you refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the entity holding all the cards.
The Oslo process started after secret negotiations in Oslo, resulting in the recognition by the PLO of the State of Israel and the recognition by Israel of the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and as a partner in negotiations.