I don't see any of those articles stating an indictment was right around the corner, just that it looked like the government had sufficient evidence to get one when/if they sought it, and those cases often take a long time as you want to have as ironclad a prosecution as possible in this case. In fact if anything several of them explicitly refute your point by talking about how investigations will proceed 'in the months ahead' and such.I get it. But it seems almost every day theres more and more evidence against Trump. How much do they need?
indictments have been right around the corner for 9 months-
Trump Prosecutors See Evidence for Bringing Obstruction Charges - Bloomberg
January 6 panel’s body of work boosts DoJ case against Trump, experts say | US Capitol attack | The Guardian
For experts, the evidence in two probes compels charging Trump | The Hill
DOJ lays out strongest obstruction evidence against Trump yet (usatoday.com)
ad nauseum
This is a case of you reading things into the articles that they don't actually say.