woolfe9998
Lifer
- Apr 8, 2013
- 16,188
- 14,093
- 136
I guess if you can't find anything illegal, keep harassing your political opponents with civil suits.
You seem befuddled over the definition of "illegal."
I guess if you can't find anything illegal, keep harassing your political opponents with civil suits.
Seriously how many times do you have to call him racist and then explain he isn't? If I have a nickel every time you type "racist" I can afford a Starbuck.
trump most definitely is racist as hell. you know, like thisI'm sorry that the finer point is lost on you? Trump is a piece of shit, and does a lot of bad crap, but flat out racism....eh, it's not that black and white. And before I get the 'but he said' treatment again, if anyone has ever made derogatory remarks of any kind about another race, does that make you racist? Or does that only apply to the whites? Also waiting for the 'but I never' excuses which is most likely not the full truth. Obviously this ruffled a few feathers, but in case you haven't read my other posts in other threads, I hate Trump with a passion. So don't misinterpret my opinion here.
trump most definitely is racist as hell. you know, like this
]
you also don't put the likes of stephen miller and steve bannon on your staff...unless you're a giant PoS racist
$250 Million? That would cover 14.4% of second avenue phase 2 which is $1.734 BIllion.Not to mention the approximately $250 million they're seeking for damages (I think.)
You know I have been racking my brain trying to figure out why, with all the screaming about witch hunts on the right why it is that the left just is too stupid to see it and it occurred to me like a bolt out of the blue one extremely remote possibility, but one that really would explain everything. Well the really weird thought that crossed my madcap brain was the notion, what if the explanation for all of that horrible harassment derives from the fact that Trump is guilty, that he actually is a fucking worthless piece of shit criminal. But, of course that is impossible because I couldn't possibly be that poor a judge of character. That would be really tough on my ego. Has to be wrong, right?I guess if you can't find anything illegal, keep harassing your political opponents with civil suits.
Even so he still did manage to incriminate himself. He answered one question and one question only, "What is your name?" He used the name of a well known criminal.CBS stated today, unlike criminal charges, a civil charge can use "pleading the 5th" against you. He did that 440 times in this suit.
I guess if you can't find anything illegal, keep harassing your political opponents with civil suits.
Not an indictment, a lawsuit.And this makes how many indictments now?
Trump could use those indictments to build his wall.
It’s a civil case, not a criminal case.Not an indictment, a lawsuit.
It's seems strange to me that Trump is being sued for his criminal activity rather than being arrested for it. The DA ran through a pretty extensive list of crimes that the other NY investigation appears to have missed, and decided to sue Trump rather than arrest him. I've never heard of that happening before.
I'll be very interested in seeing this story develop over the next couple of years.
Not an indictment, a lawsuit.
It's seems strange to me that Trump is being sued for his criminal activity rather than being arrested for it. The DA ran through a pretty extensive list of crimes that the other NY investigation appears to have missed, and decided to sue Trump rather than arrest him. I've never heard of that happening before.
I'll be very interested in seeing this story develop over the next couple of years.
Oh, no. Old man racist is the racists of racist that ever racist. They may not be the ones hoisting the rope, but that is only because they drove the pickup.He's just old white man racist, which aren't technically the same.
Unfortunately not. The IRS's official policy is that it is too much trouble to enforce tax law on anyone that is too rich or connected. Think I'm joking? It is literally official policy.If he was playing fast and loose with the IRS, he's in trouble. Those folks aren't to be trifled with.
Who would have guessed that when you have enough money you can hire people to make your taxes an endless series of spiderwebs and nesting dolls.....Oh, no. Old man racist is the racists of racist that ever racist. They may not be the ones hoisting the rope, but that is only because they drove the pickup.
Unfortunately not. The IRS's official polity is that it is too much trouble to enforce tax law on anyone that is too rich or connected. Think I'm joking? It is literally official policy.
The IRS Admits It Doesn’t Audit the Rich Because It’s Too Hard
IRS: Sorry, but It’s Just Easier and Cheaper to Audit the Poor
Why the Rich Don’t Get Audited
You seem to be cool with crime so long as the perps look like youI guess if you can't find anything illegal, keep harassing your political opponents with civil suits.
Not an indictment, a lawsuit.
It's seems strange to me that Trump is being sued for his criminal activity rather than being arrested for it. The DA ran through a pretty extensive list of crimes that the other NY investigation appears to have missed, and decided to sue Trump rather than arrest him. I've never heard of that happening before.
I'll be very interested in seeing this story develop over the next couple of years.
I'll let someone with more knowledge about this sort of thing like @woolfe9998 comment on how common it is to pursue a civil case in lieu of a criminal one in situations like these.
As it has been pointed out, a civil case does not preclude a criminal one from happening in the future, and information about possible crimes has been passed on to investigative authorities. It may well be coming.
Also please understand the burden of proof in civil cases is different from criminal ones, and you are allowed to make adverse inferences when someone invokes 5th amendment privilege. There is good reason that a civil case may be the best idea right now even if a criminal case also makes sense.
An NYT article I read said she didn't have the authority to charge Trump but it didn't go into details.NYAG only has jurisdiction to prosecute specific crimes, where it is granted by a specific statute. Most types of crimes can only be prosecuted by local DA's. This may be the reason.
An NYT article I read said she didn't have the authority to charge Trump but it didn't go into details.
Exactly. Some may argue that he is not a racist, but it is undeniable that he is #1 with actual racists. Functionally, does that make it any different if he were or were not a racist at that point?trump most definitely is racist as hell. you know, like this
]
you also don't put the likes of stephen miller and steve bannon on your staff...unless you're a giant PoS racist
I mean he was literally sued by the DOJ for refusing to rent apartments to black people. Exactly what does it take?Exactly. Some may argue that he is not a racist, but it is undeniable that he is #1 with actual racists. Functionally, does that make it any different if he were or were not a racist at that point?
The main point is, no matter skin colour or gender, if they can be of use to him, he will try to take advantage of it.Exactly. Some may argue that he is not a racist, but it is undeniable that he is #1 with actual racists. Functionally, does that make it any different if he were or were not a racist at that point?
Definition for indictment is an accusation so they are practically synonymousNot an indictment, a lawsuit.
It's seems strange to me that Trump is being sued for his criminal activity rather than being arrested for it. The DA ran through a pretty extensive list of crimes that the other NY investigation appears to have missed, and decided to sue Trump rather than arrest him. I've never heard of that happening before.
I'll be very interested in seeing this story develop over the next couple of years.
I'm sure he's not a real racist. It's just that white people are so much more useful. I mean, why bother with people who are so worthless they get stereotyped as inferior when there's enough light to see the color of their skin, right? It's not racism, it's just not a good business strategy for a company to be at the vanguard of redressing historical racial discrimination. Best to lag behind by a few centuries until it's totally safe. Really, it's not racism. It's dollars and sense.The main point is, no matter skin colour or gender, if they can be of use to him, he will try to take advantage of it.