Is this pic real or computer-generated?

[geno]

Originally posted by: Anubis
ITS FVCKING REAL

no sh!t, I can't believe how many people think that it's CG :roll: sad really

 

[PurdueRy]

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage

Originally posted by: th3dumbguy
extracted exif data:

File size: 128493 bytes
File date: 2005:10:17 22:10:22
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot G3
Date/Time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
Resolution: 909 x 682
Flash used: No (auto)
Focal length: 7.2mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
CCD width: 7.11mm
Exposure time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
Aperture: f/4.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight

its real.

That extraction data is fake, I still call CGI.

I sure hope the is for sarcasm

 

[her209]

My question is then: Where are all the buildings in the background?

link

 

[loup garou]

Originally posted by: her209
My question is then: Where are all the buildings in the background?

link

The only thing behind it from that angle is Battery Park.

 

[JustAnAverageGuy]

I've got tons of these!

 

[Rubycon]

There's EXIF data in mine too!

That'll learn ya!

 

[TekViper]

I still say its CGI. After spending all that time rendering the scene, modifying the EXIF and changing the filename are just minor in comparision to add to the realism.

 

[RandomFool]

I looks pretty real but it's way to clean and nice...My head hurts

 

[mcvickj]

If this picture is real the PowerShot G3 sure takes some lousy pictures. Or someone modified the original picture.

 

[loic2003]

Originally posted by: th3dumbguy
extracted exif data:

File size: 128493 bytes
File date: 2005:10:17 22:10:22
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot G3
Date/Time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
Resolution: 909 x 682
Flash used: No (auto)
Focal length: 7.2mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
CCD width: 7.11mm
Exposure time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
Aperture: f/4.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight

its real.

Duh! obviously someone rendered it then took a photo of their monitor. Man you guys are tards, it's so fake!

(ensure sarcasm meters have fresh batteries)

 

[Mucho]

real

 

[oddyager]

Real.

 

[Brutuskend]

CG

The building just don't look right.

Well done though!

 

[rh71]

I don't have a single thought that it is real. I know the exif says otherwise, but nothing else leads me to believe it.

UNTIL... you look at:
http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/bmdoobiew/IMG_0413.JPG (left half of the bus looks semi-fake)
http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/bmdoobiew/IMG_0412.JPG (definitely real)
http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/bmdoobiew/IMG_0411.JPG (left half looks fake )

Must be the camera - and it's not just blurriness... but having 412 makes 410 real. You would've never convinced me with 410 alone. I don't know how you guys can compare 410 and 412 and say they're equally real. Something is wrong with the clarity. You guys have to at least see that much.

 

[loic2003]

the only reason it looks fake is that it's a clean image with very little noise. It's real.

 

[akubi]

Originally posted by: lizardth
if it is fake they are damn good

 

[Kelemvor]

I'd vote Computer. Street looks too smooth, no dirt, grease marks, etc.

 

[PurdueRy]

Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
I'd vote Computer. Street looks too smooth, no dirt, grease marks, etc.

But it also looks recently repaved...

Anyway, its basically been proven real by the other pictures, I don't know why you guys would assume its fake in the first place. The picture has been resized, that can really make a picture look blurry and/or jagged if done with a quick program.

 

[DaShen]

Real, but at a higher resolution would be nice to make sure.

 

[Deleted member 4644]

Real, but downsampled kind of the same way IE or firefox compress an images to fit.

 

[Bassyhead]

It doesn't look quite right. Make a poll?

 

[DanTMWTMP]

real for sure. people already found out from the number in the photo that the biulding is real, etc. a higher resolution pic would be nice. And there's many ways you can photoshop an image to "look CG"



remember that one thread about that chinese girl that was "real or cg?" And I proved it was real since I linked to her modelling site w/ the same group of pictures.

 

[Gunslinger08]

I'll still have to go CG, because there's no doubt it has been editted in someway by a computer. This is not the original image.

 

[sswingle]

I love threads like this. Take a picture thats so obviously real, and read all the reasons its gotta be cg.

 

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: ScottSwingleComputers
I love threads like this. Take a picture thats so obviously real, and read all the reasons its gotta be cg.

Please :roll: obviously my ass, it looked too perfect to be real.