Is this pic real or computer-generated?

[BrokenVisage]

404 - reality not found

 

[loup garou]

Originally posted by: her209

Originally posted by: loup garou
Christ, it's real. I'll PM bmdoobiew and tami and get them to enlighten you maroons.

The building does exist, but someone could of CGed that pic.

I highly doubt it as tami and bmdoobiew take tons of pics around NYC and it's in his pics directory.

 

[PHiuR]

computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?

 

[bkch0]

Its real. Its the west side of Manhattan where the bike path is at.

 

[PurdueRy]

Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?

That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real

 

[CraigRT]

it looks perfectly real to me.....

 

[geno]

I'd say real only for the reason of "who the hell would bother to model such a boring scene"

 

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: bkch0
Its real. Its the west side of Manhattan where the bike path is at.

yeah, and?

 

[illusion88]

why would someone make that image on a computer?

 

[loup garou]

Originally posted by: PurdueRy

Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?

That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real

I have an appointment tomorrow morning at a client on Broad. Maybe if it's as nice tomorrow as it was today, I'll sneak over for a stroll through Battery Park, then snap a pic of West St.

 

[silverpig]

Originally posted by: PurdueRy

Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?

That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real

You can CG a real scene you know...

 

[UNCjigga]

Looking down the road, looks like there is some texture filtering going on when you look at the angle. But that could be JPEG artifacts. That yellow line is "too clean" though, so I vote good CGI.

 

[UlricT]

funky exposures set in the camera

 

[PurdueRy]

Originally posted by: silverpig

Originally posted by: PurdueRy

Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?

That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real

You can CG a real scene you know...

I give up some of you guys just read too much into things. There is cracks in the white paint. There is random stuff under the bushes. The scene doesn't even make sense to render....BAH!

 

[Anubis]

ITS FVCKING REAL

 

[BD2003]

Its real. It even *looks* like it was shot with a digital camera. You can see chips in the paint in the yellow line.

Besides, the best proof of all, is that there is no reason, anyone, would ever, ever choose that as a subject to CG.

Hell even IMG-0409 is the filename, which basically tells me its the 409th pic on the CF card.

 

[loup garou]

Originally posted by: BD2003
Its real. It even *looks* like it was shot with a digital camera. You can see chips in the paint in the yellow line.

Besides, the best proof of all, is that there is no reason, anyone, would ever, ever choose that as a subject to CG.

Hell even IMG-0409 is the filename, which basically tells me its the 409th pic on the CF card.

Not to mention all the exif data.

 

[th3dumbguy]

extracted exif data:

File size: 128493 bytes
File date: 2005:10:17 22:10:22
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot G3
Date/Time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
Resolution: 909 x 682
Flash used: No (auto)
Focal length: 7.2mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
CCD width: 7.11mm
Exposure time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
Aperture: f/4.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight

its real.

 

[Anubis]

Originally posted by: BD2003
Its real. It even *looks* like it was shot with a digital camera. You can see chips in the paint in the yellow line.

Besides, the best proof of all, is that there is no reason, anyone, would ever, ever choose that as a subject to CG.

Hell even IMG-0409 is the filename, which basically tells me its the 409th pic on the CF card.

all that and apperently people forgot how to right click

Image input equipment: Canon
Image input equipment model: Canon PowerShot G3
File change date and time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34

 

[BD2003]

Do I get a cookie?

 

[DaWhim]

real for the win

 

[Looney]

Real. Somebody just doesn't know how to use their camera very well.

 

[PurdueRy]

Text

pic of the data all the sane people are talking about

 

[Rubycon]

Originally posted by: silverpig

You can CG a real scene you know...

yep!

 

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: th3dumbguy
extracted exif data:

File size: 128493 bytes
File date: 2005:10:17 22:10:22
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot G3
Date/Time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
Resolution: 909 x 682
Flash used: No (auto)
Focal length: 7.2mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
CCD width: 7.11mm
Exposure time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
Aperture: f/4.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight

its real.

That extraction data is fake, I still call CGI.