• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is this pic real or computer-generated?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: loup garou
Christ, it's real. I'll PM bmdoobiew and tami and get them to enlighten you maroons.
Click to expand...
The building does exist, but someone could of CGed that pic.
Click to expand...
I highly doubt it as tami and bmdoobiew take tons of pics around NYC and it's in his pics directory.
 
Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?
Click to expand...


That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real
 
I'd say real only for the reason of "who the hell would bother to model such a boring scene" 😛
 
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?
Click to expand...


That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real
Click to expand...
I have an appointment tomorrow morning at a client on Broad. Maybe if it's as nice tomorrow as it was today, I'll sneak over for a stroll through Battery Park, then snap a pic of West St.
 
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?
Click to expand...


That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real
Click to expand...

You can CG a real scene you know...
 
Looking down the road, looks like there is some texture filtering going on when you look at the angle. But that could be JPEG artifacts. That yellow line is "too clean" though, so I vote good CGI.
 
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: PHiuR
computer generated.
if you say it's real you should get your eyes checked?
Click to expand...


That's a question?

Someone go take a picture of the exact scene to show them that it is real
Click to expand...

You can CG a real scene you know...
Click to expand...


I give up some of you guys just read too much into things. There is cracks in the white paint. There is random stuff under the bushes. The scene doesn't even make sense to render....BAH!
 
Its real. It even *looks* like it was shot with a digital camera. You can see chips in the paint in the yellow line.

Besides, the best proof of all, is that there is no reason, anyone, would ever, ever choose that as a subject to CG.

Hell even IMG-0409 is the filename, which basically tells me its the 409th pic on the CF card. 😛
 
Originally posted by: BD2003
Its real. It even *looks* like it was shot with a digital camera. You can see chips in the paint in the yellow line.

Besides, the best proof of all, is that there is no reason, anyone, would ever, ever choose that as a subject to CG.

Hell even IMG-0409 is the filename, which basically tells me its the 409th pic on the CF card. 😛
Click to expand...
Not to mention all the exif data.
 
extracted exif data:

File size: 128493 bytes
File date: 2005:10:17 22:10:22
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot G3
Date/Time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
Resolution: 909 x 682
Flash used: No (auto)
Focal length: 7.2mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
CCD width: 7.11mm
Exposure time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
Aperture: f/4.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight

its real.
 
Originally posted by: BD2003
Its real. It even *looks* like it was shot with a digital camera. You can see chips in the paint in the yellow line.

Besides, the best proof of all, is that there is no reason, anyone, would ever, ever choose that as a subject to CG.

Hell even IMG-0409 is the filename, which basically tells me its the 409th pic on the CF card. 😛
Click to expand...

all that and apperently people forgot how to right click

Image input equipment: Canon
Image input equipment model: Canon PowerShot G3
File change date and time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
 
Originally posted by: th3dumbguy
extracted exif data:

File size: 128493 bytes
File date: 2005:10:17 22:10:22
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot G3
Date/Time: 2004:05:20 17:36:34
Resolution: 909 x 682
Flash used: No (auto)
Focal length: 7.2mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
CCD width: 7.11mm
Exposure time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
Aperture: f/4.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: center weight

its real.
Click to expand...

That extraction data is fake, I still call CGI. 😛
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top