Is Obama A Muslim?

[MongGrel]

Why does this stupidity continue.

 

[soulcougher73]

I don't care what religion he worships as long as he keeps the shit out of his speeches or opinions on governing matters.

 

[Indus]

Why does this stupidity continue.

Who's the more foolish? The fool or the one who follows him?

 

[Newell Steamer]

Who's the more foolish? The fool or the one who follows him?

The ones who point out their behavior.

 

[peonyu]

He drinks beer.
He eats hot dogs.
He eats pork.
He OWNS a dog ! [dogs are a unclean animal in Islam]
He has attended Church.
Etc etc etc.

Im no Obama fan [voted Romney last time] but he is not a Muslim...OR a Christian imo, he smacks of a atheist. And i dont think Obama is truely horrible either, I mean by this far into his term, GWB was worse. Obama is low on my list for the same reasons Hillary is - lies lies and more damn lies. We fuck up Libya due to lies, fuck up Syria by indirectly helping ISIS. And this is just me, but Assad in Syria is GOOD compared to all alternatives there are...A GOOD president would back Assad up at this time. But it doesnt happen. ISIS is allowed to take over Syria slowly but surely. More Christians, Gays, Non-Sunnis are murdered every day there due to Obama siding with ISIS against Assad, and some wonder why other ethnic groups [particularly Muslim ones] hate the USA.

ps- Yes i know i have a Dog Muhammad avatar, but its there due to Muslim hyper sensitivity. ANY group which kills over a drawing deserves to be mocked.

 

[Whiskey16]

Freedom of speech involves recognition of intent.

Intent may be fairly judged and condemned.

The intention to abuse speech to insult and incite the destruction of a group (racial, ethnic, religious) is regularly and correctly unacceptable:

ps- Yes i know i have a Dog Muhammad avatar, but its there due to Muslim hyper sensitivity. ANY group which kills over a drawing deserves to be mocked.

Categorizing all Muslims as 'killers' and portraying them as terrorist is full on hate speech.

peonyu, you are the absolute equivalent of a neo-Nazi, abusing another's property -- this forum -- and in violation of its rules to regularly (with every one of your posts in any subforum) promote hatred of a targeted group.

This is a supported fact. Click on peonyu's AnandTech profile:



History is also full of those who had book burning of Torahs, firebombing synagogues, and the destruction of people who were identifiable by their faith.

As demonstrated in peonyu's profile, that is peonyu's goal -- to illegally destroy those of an identifiable group.

Such a mission is often enabled with the dissemination of hate propaganda images that dehumanise the targeted group and classifies them all as threatening and criminal:



Just as peonyu's avatar.

Such acts of generalised public derogatory vilification application, is right in line in the criminal mission of similar images in history:

The Nazi propaganda film “The Eternal Jew”, purporting to be a documentary, was given its public premiere on 28th November 1940. It was all part of the continuing process of desensitising the general population to the growing persecution of the Jews. The message was presented very crudely, as can be imagined from the poster. This was another step toward the Holocaust.

Their goal was to depict Jews as a real threat and enemies to the German people. This type of propaganda is using the Jewish people as SCAPEGOATS,and spreadsFEAR to their people.

"The Evil Jew"





His big nose was supposedly a sign of depravity or (due to its phallic appearance and the fact that it pointed downwards). His big hands were said to be a sign of a thief (and an explanation of where he got his money from). Blemished skin was a sign of inner wickedness and corruption. Other outlandish claims include the belief Jews drank the blood of children (arising from a misinterpretation of kosher animal slaughter) and the idea they were part of an evil global conspiracy in league with either the devil, the Catholics or the Muslims.

With every one of his posts, peonyu is disseminating vilifying hate speech to demonise all Muslims in his mission to destroy that religion ("CLOSE ALL MOSQUES, MADRASSAS & ISLAMIC BOOKSHOPS")​

 

[Whiskey16]

... Assad in Syria is GOOD compared to all alternatives there are...A GOOD president would back Assad up...

The Assad government has killed and tortured far more Syrians than any other single group.

peonyo is not only on this forum recorded as promoting singular crimes and hatred against all Muslims, but as a backer of the Assad dictatorship.

 

[TheGardener]

You do seem to love spreading around some rather trite & obvious right wing distortions-

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/truth-on-the-cutting-room-floor/

Only the weak minded & gullible fall for that stuff but there does seem to be plenty of such folks in this country, sad to say.

I should be ignoring you. You are weak minded. You probably didn't even watch the short videos. As I said above, I was showing 2 videos, because one was edited. I said that the second was more complete. But you don't care. Just more knee jerk reactions. I distorted nothing.

 

[TheGardener]

The intention to abuse speech to insult and incite the destruction of a group (racial, ethnic, religious) is regularly and correctly unacceptable:

And yet you do it. I guess you are exempt, because you are somehow morally superior. You're as bad and evil as the worst.

 

[MongGrel]

 

[Whiskey16]

Freedom of speech involves recognition of intent.

Intent may be fairly judged and condemned.

The intention to abuse speech to insult and incite the destruction of a group (racial, ethnic, religious) is regularly and correctly unacceptable:

And yet you do it. I guess you are exempt, because you are somehow morally superior. You're as bad and evil as the worst.

Ahhh, the old intellectually and morally bankrupt internet meme of one being a bigot, 'evil' and equal to those Nazis all for being intolerant of intolerance.

Wow, TheGardener, you are quite the wack job.

Speech has consequences. Not all speech is appropriate nor acceptable in all forums.

As peonyu, to consistently express generalised hatred and explicit incitement to the destruction of a group (Muslims, based upon religious identification) is absolutely unacceptable and no one here should feel cowed into silence by the likes of you.

The AnandTech P&N certainly attracts and retains the extremist loons. As long as the likes of peonyu continues to use this forum (with every post he presents) to publish neo-Nazi type hatred and destructive goals, the likes of you, TheGardener will retain a feeling of welcome and safe to be so stupid as to label myself as 'evil as the worst.'

 

[Whiskey16]

And yet you do it. I guess you are exempt, because you are somehow morally superior. You're as bad and evil as the worst.

Trump's race and hate based trolling is to help solidify a base of some of the worst of society.

It is intently wedge based divisive politics to apply xenophobia mistrust against groups questionably identified as threats to one's own group.

peonyu, with his explicit hatred of Muslims and incitement for their destruction is just the type of hateful low-life that has been lured in.

Just this past week in the Canadian federal campaign, the incumbent Prime Minister Harper during as debate used the terms new and 'old stock' Canadians to distinguish his feeling of bigotedly hierarchical citizenship. Coincidently, that was just days after hiring a controversial campaign fixer who is notorious for applying race/religious baiting extremism known as 'dog whistle politics:'

Lynton Crosby has also been linked to tactics that have rallied voters fearful of immigration and crime behind the campaigns he advises.

..

Crosby, meanwhile, also been described as "a master of the dark political arts."

The term "dog-whistle politics" is said to have originated in Australia in response to the tactics used by the Crosby-led Howard campaign team.
The term refers to the use of code words that seem benign to the general populace but which are intended to send veiled messages — typically racist or otherwise distasteful messages — to target voters.

..

Crosby employed similar tactics in 2005 when he ran the unsuccessful Conservative campaign in the United Kingdom.

He is credited with creating the slogan "Are you thinking what we're thinking," which appeared on billboards, posters and campaign literature alongside messages on hot-button issues like, "It's not racist to impose limits on immigration," and, "How would you feel if a bloke on early release attacked your daughter?"

A more politically nuanced reincarnation of Joseph Goebbels propaganda defamatory perfection.

 

[MovingTarget]

No. He is Christian. Remember that Rev. Jeremiah Wright guy? The pastor that the right was all worked about? Yeah, he's not preaching islam. Personally, I don't care what religion Obama is, so long as his policies are sound. Those saying he is a muslim are doing so to demonize him when it isn't socially acceptable to do so by saying he is black (or insert racial epithet here).

 

[railer]

voted yes only because most of OP's posts are idiotic.

 

[MongGrel]

Is kinda like that JFK guy was.

Damned Catholics.

:whiste:

 

[MongGrel]

This should have been a public poll. I wonder how many of the Yes votes are "liberal" trolls trying to make it look like the right is crazier than they are?

That's not a mirror, it's an empty picture frame you're holding in front of your face.

Her people started this shit. This isn't some right only thing. Both sides have kooks.

 

[Jhhnn]

I should be ignoring you. You are weak minded. You probably didn't even watch the short videos. As I said above, I was showing 2 videos, because one was edited. I said that the second was more complete. But you don't care. Just more knee jerk reactions. I distorted nothing.

You merely put obvious distortions right under our noses with one being more crude than the other.

And now you're being coy about it even when presented with a much more accurate representation of what was said and intended.

You're being terribly dishonest, perhaps starting with yourself.

 

[Jaskalas]

The more basic premise derives from his foreign background coupled with Democrat polices that are openly friendly to Muslims. Though we shouldn't forget Bush and the Saudis.

I don't see what Obama policy has existed that is uniquely "his" and not standard party line.
What "Muslim" actions has he taken?

 

[peonyu]

Freedom of speech involves recognition of intent.

Intent may be fairly judged and condemned.

The intention to abuse speech to insult and incite the destruction of a group (racial, ethnic, religious) is regularly and correctly unacceptable:

Categorizing all Muslims as 'killers' and portraying them as terrorist is full on hate speech.

peonyu, you are the absolute equivalent of a neo-Nazi, abusing another's property -- this forum -- and in violation of its rules to regularly (with every one of your posts in any subforum) promote hatred of a targeted group.

This is a supported fact. Click on peonyu's AnandTech profile:



History is also full of those who had book burning of Torahs, firebombing synagogues, and the destruction of people who were identifiable by their faith.

As demonstrated in peonyu's profile, that is peonyu's goal -- to illegally destroy those of an identifiable group.

Such a mission is often enabled with the dissemination of hate propaganda images that dehumanise the targeted group and classifies them all as threatening and criminal:



Just as peonyu's avatar.

Such acts of generalised public derogatory vilification application, is right in line in the criminal mission of similar images in history:

With every one of his posts, peonyu is disseminating vilifying hate speech to demonise all Muslims in his mission to destroy that religion ("CLOSE ALL MOSQUES, MADRASSAS & ISLAMIC BOOKSHOPS")​

First off, bringing up Nazis is so lame. Especially since you dont even know my ethnic background, i could be Jewish for all you know ! Israel and Islam have a undeclared war going on at the moment, with Sunni Muslims salivating at the thought of over running Israel one day and killing the Jews and Christians there - So there is no love between Islam and Judiasm at the moment. I love Jewish people btw.
Secondly, a famous ISRAELI once said - "Not all Muslims are terrorists but most terrorists are Muslim." It is a FACT that that religion is the one most prone to creating terror, its also a FACT that in most Muslim countries you will be put to death for making fun of Muham-nbomb-head [pigs be upon him]. So as a American i exercise my right to make fun of Muham-terrorist-head [pigs be upon him] until they get their shit together and stop murderering people for exercising freedom [or shooting up comic book artists].


As far as Assad goes, he is not perfect but he is far superior to ISIS, and ISIS is who will take over if Assad is removed.
So if you like the idea of Christians being murdered, and gays being thrown off of buildings by Sunni-Muslim bigots, then i guess Assad NEEDS TO GO amirite ??


Also let me throw this bone out there for people who like to think sometimes...A religion is a written book or set of rules. As such it CAN be criticized and judged. Its perfectly OK to mock the Aztec religion since no one gives a fuck as they no longer exist as a religion but mock Islam or Christianity and its a big deal since they will get upset. Anyways, Muhammad was a muderering warlord and his Quran confirms it, as such that religion sucks ass. And it treats women like shit to.

 

[Jhhnn]

Obama siding with ISIS against Assad

Which is obviously why we're bombing ISIS and not Assad. Truly devious.

 

[pcgeek11]

At this point in time; What difference does it make... Meh.

 

[Vic]

This should have been a public poll. I wonder how many of the Yes votes are "liberal" trolls trying to make it look like the right is crazier than they are?

Is this forum the only place that you ever visit on the internet or something?

 

[UberNeuman]

Is Obama a Muslim? No, it's worse.

He's a republican.

 

[trenchfoot]

Is Obama a Muslim? No, it's worse.

He's a republican.

An earlier version of what they used to be, yes I agree, no doubt about it. As an example, those Trade Agreements that have proven to hurt the middle class and the poor is something he and the Clintons are pushing for. I guess it's his vision of having a "balanced form of gov't."

And yet the Repubs themselves still hate his guts. But then even 'ol Jeb Bush ain't Republican enough for them.

And I guess a person can't be both a Muslim AND a REAL Republican all at once given how a very vocal sector of that party is chiming in on that particular point of contention.

Here's some things that are a bit dated but IMO still applies:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/29/opinion/obeidallah-gop-muslim-problem/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/front...nd-mosque/america-and-muslims-by-the-numbers/

 

[sandorski]

If Obama isn't a Muslim, why isn't the Middle East a sheet of glass?

We could turn the whole region into a solar freakin collector!