blankslate
Diamond Member
the 1950s all over again...
or a remix of that time?
___________
or a remix of that time?
___________
China to the extent it can.As we saw Russia's build up in Europe. The world can clearly see the United State's next moves.
I wonder if anyone will assist Iran? Iraq sort of owes them. But this is hardly a fight anyone wants, or is prepared for.
Would take a lot of resources, and drones, to impact US military operations.
But then rebels in Yemen could do it....
US military preparing for potentially weeks-long Iran operations
defencesecurityasia.com
defencesecurityasia.com
So could winning the lottery. Random thoughts passing for policy.
So could winning the lottery. Random thoughts passing for policy.
Oh boy... this is gonna suck hard, because Indians helps Taliban and USA would screw Indians because of that.Something tells me a ground invasion + keeping forces stationed in Iran would lead to a massive loss of US forces.
US plan has to be more slash and burn. Not stay and rebuild, right?
Taliban says it would support Iran if US attacks
If is China, we know what might be the tool to use in the US China trade warIran may have hacked the Epstein files.
Iran if you're listening, release them.
Well in the big picture it does distract the goldfish focus our press away from those files.Something tells me a ground invasion + keeping forces stationed in Iran would lead to a massive loss of US forces.
US plan has to be more slash and burn. Not stay and rebuild, right?
Taliban says it would support Iran if US attacks
Theres always a quote from him...
Strategic thinking isn't exactly their strong suit.They’ve moved so many assets that it’s hard to imagine they don’t pull the trigger. The actual goals here are pretty uh vaguely defined. Even if you somehow bombed your way to a free and democratic Iran they’re probably going to be nuclear armed and still not like us.

If anything, the US experience in Iraq and Afghanistan shows that the American public lacks the appetite for large-causualty conflict and the resources required to build up a nation in the aftermath. Importantly, this also limits the military's ability to carry out certain operations and leads to these long, low-burn conflicts with no exit strategy. As apolitical as the military wants to be, politics will come for them regardless.Does not the US experience in Iraq and Afghanistan suggest that even if you topple a regime, whatever pops up to replace it will likely not be friendly to the US?
Does not the US experience in Iraq and Afghanistan suggest that even if you topple a regime, whatever pops up to replace it will likely not be friendly to the US?