Not in a typical sense. Remember it's BGA, so if you have the motherboard developed and you only need the CPU from Intel then yes you'll probably be able to buy it.
But unless you are a super hardcore DIY that goes through the process of fully custom designing a motherboard to work with modern processors, you are likely a small company that needs the CPU to ship in their products.
If you look at Zen 3, or even Apple M1, it does not deviate from the Core philosophy. They are just wider and bigger. So in that case they will not change.
Superscalar? Pentium.
Out of Order? Pentium Pro/Pentium II.
Micron Op Fusion? Pentium M
Macro Op Fusion? Core.
Physical registers? Done with Sandy Bridge.
uop Caches? Sandy Bridge again.
What needs to change is their focus on absurd, inefficient 5GHz+ frequency aim for something much less but much wider.
Pentium M might have it's ancestry based on Pentium II, but really it's the philosophy of going about it that changed. In a way Netburst is actually Pentium III philosophy continued. Because nothing really changed. Because in the Pentium III days you just needed to move to a fancy new process and voila! you get a much better CPU. Pentium M was when they decided "We need to be different in our approach, it's not about clocks. We might reach a point where the new process itself is not enough".
Netburst's 4-5GHz frequency target was reduced to 3GHz in Core right? So iterations of Core made it reach 4-5GHz again. So focus on going back down to the 3-4GHz range. Pretty much rinse and repeat at this point because as I've said it before and again, unless you are going exotic cooling, anything much higher than 5GHz is impossible.
Maybe this Hybrid thing will give them more flexibility in this regard but it doesn't change much if the big core portion is super large and inefficient.
Let's say if Core was efficient as Zen 3? Alderlake might have been 12+12.