Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 655 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,094
16,014
136
Geez, this was announced back in February! Well, whatever else is going on, Intel is at least tacitly revealing that they know they are behind. What’s the saying, the beginning of wisdom is to admit your faults?
Except.... Remember "....AMD is in the rear view mirror and will stay there..." (or something like that)
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,913
4,504
126
Except.... Remember "....AMD is in the rear view mirror and will stay there..." (or something like that)
Please try reading his quote and then coming back to this thread. Hint: he said client not server. This is at least the 2nd time you tried to pass that quote off on a server product.
 

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2019
3,331
5,282
136
Please try reading his quote and then coming back to this thread. Hint: he said client not server. This is at least the 2nd time you tried to pass that quote off on a server product.

Yeah, but is also in the record saying that AMD time is over with Sapphire Rapids..

“And yeah, AMD has done a solid job over the last couple of years. We won’t dismiss them of the good work that they’ve done, but that’s over with Alder Lake and Sapphire Rapids,” Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,094
16,014
136
Please try reading his quote and then coming back to this thread. Hint: he said client not server. This is at least the 2nd time you tried to pass that quote off on a server product.
What I was responding to was the comment that maybe Intel is admitting problems, and learning, and I am saying NO to that. I see no real learning or change, other than a small marketing change. Admitting that AMD did good for a couple of years. Alder lake is not king in everything, and they are in the dumper for servers, so AMD are certainly not in Intels rear view mirror for anything.
 

lobz

Platinum Member
Feb 10, 2017
2,057
2,856
136
Please try reading his quote and then coming back to this thread. Hint: he said client not server. This is at least the 2nd time you tried to pass that quote off on a server product.
Ouch... what a misfire! Nice try dullard.
 

Exist50

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2016
2,452
3,106
136
Yeah, but is also in the record saying that AMD time is over with Sapphire Rapids..

“And yeah, AMD has done a solid job over the last couple of years. We won’t dismiss them of the good work that they’ve done, but that’s over with Alder Lake and Sapphire Rapids,” Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger
This seems to be in reference to AMD's lead at any given time. Seems subtly different. Of course, hinges on them actually shipping SPR before Genoa shows up...
 

Henry swagger

Senior member
Feb 9, 2022
509
312
106
Alder lake is selling like hot cakes 15 million units shipped
 
  • Like
Reactions: controlflow

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,094
16,014
136
Alder lake is selling like hot cakes 15 million units shipped
And how many AMD units are being sold ? What has that got to do with Sapphire raids being delayed anyway ? Yes, its in the article, but it means nothing about the cause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,642
12,245
136
Alder lake is selling like hot cakes 15 million units shipped

Fifteen million in ~7 months seems like a lot, but isn't really for Intel. Intel said Tigerlake sold 30 million in slightly less time (~6.5 months) and that was mobile only.
 

Hotrod2go

Senior member
Nov 17, 2021
349
233
86
Fifteen million in ~7 months seems like a lot, but isn't really for Intel. Intel said Tigerlake sold 30 million in slightly less time (~6.5 months) and that was mobile only.
Whole platform upgrades tend to be for the well off with disposable income these days. Many users in average joe land don't upgrade unless something is broken. What with growing global inflationary pressures & supply chain problems still, its a wonder they sold that many already really.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,276
1,679
136
Fifteen million in ~7 months seems like a lot, but isn't really for Intel. Intel said Tigerlake sold 30 million in slightly less time (~6.5 months) and that was mobile only.
Tiger Lake was released for mobile in the middle of the pandemic when many were purchasing laptops for work from home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,700
12,651
136
Granite Rapids has already suffered it's first delay

I know. That's the "old" Granite Rapids using Golden Cove on Intel 4. The "new" Granite Rapids is on either Intel 3 or Intel 20a (I forget!) in 2024. If THAT suffers delays to 2025 and if Intel bags on Sapphire Rapids and Emerald Rapids, it would mean Intel wouldn't have an enterprise CPU until 2025 . . .
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,787
136
Fifteen million in ~7 months seems like a lot, but isn't really for Intel. Intel said Tigerlake sold 30 million in slightly less time (~6.5 months) and that was mobile only.

Sorry but that's a redactedarticle. Intel claimed 15 million Alderlake shipped in their Q1 presentation. The hardwaretimes article is dated June 9th of this year. Does a lot to actually do a background check of the article you are reading. I hate how modern press has turned into just misleading headlines with little factual content.

Q1 is the quarter ending April 2nd. Intel launched mobile chips in CES of January and many people on reddit were wondering about mobile device launch as late as mid April. I can attest personally as well. Try actually looking for a laptop to buy in March when the CPU is launched in CES. Good luck with that. Tigerlake mobile launched in September of the previous year.

If you presume it takes 2 months for device availability you are talking 1 month for Alderlake. If you mean 6.5 months for Tigerlake as in mid-May, it would have been available to buy for 5 months. Also 2/3rd of Intel shipments are on laptop.

I know. That's the "old" Granite Rapids using Golden Cove on Intel 4.

Just a minor correction, old Granite Rapids was using Redwood Cove the same core in Meteorlake. The new one, who knows?

The new one is on Intel 3. 10-12% gain suggest to me either Lunar Lake isn't a big gain or it's half way to a "big gain".





No profanity allowed in the tech forums.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: controlflow

eek2121

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2005
3,384
5,011
136
At this rate, Sapphire Rapids will end up competing with Zen 5. Intel needs to get their act together.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,746
6,653
146
I know. That's the "old" Granite Rapids using Golden Cove on Intel 4. The "new" Granite Rapids is on either Intel 3 or Intel 20a (I forget!) in 2024. If THAT suffers delays to 2025 and if Intel bags on Sapphire Rapids and Emerald Rapids, it would mean Intel wouldn't have an enterprise CPU until 2025 . . .
I'm quite confident that if GNR launches in 2024, it'll be competitive with Turin which will also launch at a similar time. Even if we're talking H1 launch vs H2 launch, that'll still be fine enough by me. If it slips to 2025, then we'll probably stuck waiting for 2026 for the next best chance at competition in the DC. I really, really, REALLY hope it doesn't slip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ajay

FangBLade

Senior member
Apr 13, 2022
203
399
106
Alder lake is selling like hot cakes 15 million units shipped
https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/pc/229189 :kissingheart:
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,691
136
I'm quite confident that if GNR launches in 2024, it'll be competitive with Turin which will also launch at a similar time. Even if we're talking H1 launch vs H2 launch, that'll still be fine enough by me. If it slips to 2025, then we'll probably stuck waiting for 2026 for the next best chance at competition in the DC. I really, really, REALLY hope it doesn't slip.
Will intel have 256 cores in server SKUs? That's what it takes to be competitive with Zen5. I somehow doubt it, but who knows.
 
Jul 27, 2020
26,020
17,952
146
Will intel have 256 cores in server SKUs? That's what it takes to be competitive with Zen5. I somehow doubt it, but who knows.
oneAPI is supposed to allow easy heterogeneous application development so maybe they will compensate with extra Xe cores. It will cost them but maybe that's their plan to compete with AMD.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,493
6,987
136
If you presume it takes 2 months for device availability you are talking 1 month for Alderlake. If you mean 6.5 months for Tigerlake as in mid-May, it would have been available to buy for 5 months. Also 2/3rd of Intel shipments are on laptop.

By "shipped", Intel means that they had delivered chips to the OEM/distributor, not when end user devices were available.

If you figure that the date of the press releases is when they have started or were about to start shipping product, you can probably say that the rest of the S and the H (on Jan 4th) had 2+ months of shipments by the end of the quarter. That doesn't include the K and 12400 shipped before then.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,746
6,653
146
Will intel have 256 cores in server SKUs? That's what it takes to be competitive with Zen5. I somehow doubt it, but who knows.
I'm pretty sure I've warned people on AT Forums several times already on rumours regarding Zen 5, I'm not going to be doing it again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exist50

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,746
6,653
146
oneAPI is supposed to allow easy heterogeneous application development so maybe they will compensate with extra Xe cores. It will cost them but maybe that's their plan to compete with AMD.
Yes that is essentially Falcon Shores in a nutshell. Issue is, is that AMD are attempting to do it first with MI300. Results are yet to be seen (thanks ROCm), but my point is that Intel aren't the onky ones trying that - heck, they're not even the first.

Not to mention that approach doesn't even really work for general computing needs. There are some workloads that CPUs are just inherently more suited towards than GPUs are.