DrMrLordX
Lifer
- Apr 27, 2000
- 22,700
- 12,652
- 136
I wonder if Kuo is getting something mixed up? Lunch vs volume?
I hope so. Launch vs. volume for Ice Lake-SP had a lengthy gap so we'll see.
I wonder if Kuo is getting something mixed up? Lunch vs volume?
Hey, at least the CPU Coolers are already availableI hope so. Launch vs. volume for Ice Lake-SP had a lengthy gap so we'll see.
I think both Intel's big advantage and detriment was the isolation. All its foundry advances stood alone simply due to the fact even if somebody wanted nothing compared, since nothing comparable existed. During IFS 1.0 Intel was sitting on its high horse exactly because its foundry was the best and nothing compared, so external companies naturally were expected to adapt to Intel's internal quirks. That's why a newly competitive AMD using TSMC's competitive node was such a groundbreaking event. Barely anybody would have cared about TSMC's node if AMD's chips using it wouldn't directly show how much more efficient TSMC is with x86 is than Intel's so far. And that's why a major target of Intel is to reach performance-per-watt parity with TSMC by 2024.What I meant was that past is often looked as more positive it really was, just like how 14nm was said to be awesome and same with Skylake, when some of us didn't think Skylake was super impressive on the day of launch nevermind 5 years after release date. For me Skylake was "meh" and 14nm overall was disappointing. I didn't think 22nm was impressive either - after all they used all the performance gains for Atom anyway.
Either it's too little or it's too much, can't be both at once.Maybe Apple themselves had no idea of the volume. They must have given Intel some number that Otellini didn't consider worth their while. Also, being as proud as Intel is, he probably thought no one else could supply the volume Apple wanted.
How I wish there to be a post-mortem for these kinds of stuff. There must be a lot of stories behind this many very likely unvoluntary steppings.They are having issues validating their whole stack, they have issued multiple Pre-production steppings to try to fix them, but they are still not production ready. Intel first try at Chiplets are harder than expected. If they iron these issues they will have better results for Emerald Rapids.
It's like with Aurora: The supercomputer is done, everything is prepared, just need to plug in the SPR CPUs to start up.Hey, at least the CPU Coolers are already available
![]()
Intel "Sapphire Rapids" CPU coolers are already on Newegg, while the shipment of new Xeon series is reportedly delayed to Q2 2023 - VideoCardz.com
CPU coolers for Intel Sapphire Rapids coolers listed on Newegg Intel Sapphire Rapids coolers may already be on Newegg, but shipments of new Xeon CPUs is reportedly delayed to Q2 2023. The CPU coolers for LGA4677 socket used by next-gen Xeon Scalable processors can already be found on Newegg. The...videocardz.com
View attachment 63198
I've said it before, but any attempt to blame the current state of Sapphire Rapids on merely process or manufacturing issues is severely misguided.Which reminds me, my impression so far is that SPR is doing worse than PV which as a package seems vastly more complex. Is PV actually faring better, or is it just SPR getting the news?
Word on the street is that many of the issues and delays is that they have not been able to "Hard" Lock on the Software Defined Silicon (SDSi) mechanism and it's getting bypassed rather quickly.It's like with Aurora: The supercomputer is done, everything is prepared, just need to plug in the SPR CPUs to start up.
Which reminds me, my impression so far is that SPR is doing worse than PV which as a package seems vastly more complex. Is PV actually faring better, or is it just SPR getting the news?
Oh, it's about that turd? Then I'm a big fan of that "feature" backfiring this gloriously.Word on the street is that many of the issues and delays is that they have not been able to "Hard" Lock on the Software Defined Silicon (SDSi) mechanism and it's getting bypassed rather quickly.
If true, super dumb of them to keep trying to make it work. Just ship and worry about that feature in the next gen.Word on the street is that many of the issues and delays is that they have not been able to "Hard" Lock on the Software Defined Silicon (SDSi) mechanism and it's getting bypassed rather quickly.
Yeah, there's no way that's what's stopping them from shipping, much less a year's delay.If true, super dumb of them to keep trying to make it work. Just ship and worry about that feature in the next gen.
One of Many Issues... Sapphire Rapids can't catch a breakYeah, there's no way that's what's stopping them from shipping, much less a year's delay.
I've said it before, but any attempt to blame the current state of Sapphire Rapids on merely process or manufacturing issues is severely misguided.
There's no way that's going to fly, is there?the play is to never ramp Sapphire and cancel Emerald and pull in Granite Rapids if possible.
No possible way that can/will happen. They just delayed it a year. Can't just turn that around and pull it back in again. If anything, continued issues with SPR mean GNR is more likely to be even further delayed. SPR will basically have to keep Intel's server efforts alive for the next two years.Thought about it and I think the play is to never ramp Sapphire and cancel Emerald and pull in Granite Rapids if possible
What would NV think if this is actually true? Switching back to Intel and then... welp.
What would NV think if this is actually true? Switching back to Intel and then... welp.
Lower volume than Aurora needs?HGX is low enough volume that maybe nVidia would be able to get what they need? Off Label if need be.
Hey, at least the CPU Coolers are already available
Which reminds me, my impression so far is that SPR is doing worse than PV which as a package seems vastly more complex. Is PV actually faring better, or is it just SPR getting the news?
Thought about it and I think the play is to never ramp Sapphire and cancel Emerald and pull in Granite Rapids if possible.
Make them buy Icelake.
not surprise if these "release date" are all wrong
Lower volume than Aurora needs?
Granite Rapids has already suffered it's first delayThat would mean no new enterprise products until 2024. Assuming Granite Rapids doesn't suffer delays of its own.
Perhaps, but Ice lake and Cascade Lake are having a Terrible times at this stage, they are getting clobbered by Rome and MilanDoes anyone think that Intel may have a refresh of Ice Lake-SP on Intel 7 / 10esf as a stopgap for Saphire Rapids/Emerald Rapids? Just managing higher clock speeds and better power/thermals would be a notable improvement for that product
Aurora, as far as I can tell, is being installed.
All told, Aurora will implement 60,000+ Ponte Vecchio GPUs and 20,000+ Sapphire Rapids CPUs, said Stevens. “We’ve already installed the Intel DAOS storage system, management nodes and cooling infrastructure, and we’ve put in place a validation system with Sapphire Rapids and PVC processors in place right now for applications testing. The whole team can’t wait until we get the system up and running.”
Geez, this was announced back in February! Well, whatever else is going on, Intel is at least tacitly revealing that they know they are behind. What’s the saying, the beginning of wisdom is to admit your faults?Granite Rapids has already suffered it's first delay
![]()
Intel delays 2023 server chip, says it needs to boost spending to catch competitors
Intel hopes to catch up to TSMC and Samsung in terms of the latest generation of chip manufacturing technology.www.cnbc.com