FelixDeCat
Lifer
- Aug 4, 2000
- 30,948
- 2,666
- 126
Originally posted by: compgeek89
This happened to them, you tell me
3.0ghz = 68fps
2.6ghz = 78fps
2.4ghz = 85fps
2.2ghz = 95fps
2.0ghz = 100fps
1.8ghz = 112fps
1.6ghz = 124fps
1.4ghz = 141fps
1.2ghz = 165fps
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: compgeek89
This happened to them, you tell me
3.0ghz = 68fps
2.6ghz = 78fps
2.4ghz = 85fps
2.2ghz = 95fps
2.0ghz = 100fps
1.8ghz = 112fps
1.6ghz = 124fps
1.4ghz = 141fps
1.2ghz = 165fps![]()
Originally posted by: Xcobra
Originally posted by: swtethan
Originally posted by: Xcobra
meh, i wanna see amd's 65nm process, i think comparing 90nm vs 65nm is bogus... but again, conroe seems to be a hell of a cpu...
... today vs today
not future vs today
conroe is today
i dont care, comparing cpus that use same technology is more of a fair comparison wouldnt you say?
Originally posted by: LooneyLend him a 65nm AMD CPU then, and i'm sure he'll be more than happy to do the comparison for you.
Originally posted by: theteamaqua
fisrt off, i dont care about stock speed, AMD cpus have had cold bug for quite sometimes and i doubt AM2 doesnt, as for Conroe, some ppl in XS like fugger said htey were able to boot conroe at -150 C, not that my vapochill ls is that good only at -50c but the OC ability is just insane, E6700 can do 3.7 at air cool with DFI mobo, and i havent seen any good AM2 OC result
but anyway, if any of u find good AM2 OC results, pzl do post-