• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 compared directly to an Opteron 165 @ 3GHz

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: compgeek89
This happened to them, you tell me

3.0ghz = 68fps
2.6ghz = 78fps
2.4ghz = 85fps
2.2ghz = 95fps
2.0ghz = 100fps
1.8ghz = 112fps
1.6ghz = 124fps
1.4ghz = 141fps
1.2ghz = 165fps
Click to expand...
😕
 
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: compgeek89
This happened to them, you tell me

3.0ghz = 68fps
2.6ghz = 78fps
2.4ghz = 85fps
2.2ghz = 95fps
2.0ghz = 100fps
1.8ghz = 112fps
1.6ghz = 124fps
1.4ghz = 141fps
1.2ghz = 165fps
Click to expand...
😕
Click to expand...

very counfused... should be the other way around....
 
Originally posted by: Xcobra
Originally posted by: swtethan
Originally posted by: Xcobra
meh, i wanna see amd's 65nm process, i think comparing 90nm vs 65nm is bogus... but again, conroe seems to be a hell of a cpu...
Click to expand...

... today vs today

not future vs today

conroe is today
Click to expand...

i dont care, comparing cpus that use same technology is more of a fair comparison wouldnt you say?
Click to expand...

Lend him a 65nm AMD CPU then, and i'm sure he'll be more than happy to do the comparison for you.
 
Originally posted by: LooneyLend him a 65nm AMD CPU then, and i'm sure he'll be more than happy to do the comparison for you.
Click to expand...

I'd be waaay more than happy to 😀

I just love pre-release hardware 😛
 
Originally posted by: theteamaqua
fisrt off, i dont care about stock speed, AMD cpus have had cold bug for quite sometimes and i doubt AM2 doesnt, as for Conroe, some ppl in XS like fugger said htey were able to boot conroe at -150 C, not that my vapochill ls is that good only at -50c but the OC ability is just insane, E6700 can do 3.7 at air cool with DFI mobo, and i havent seen any good AM2 OC result

but anyway, if any of u find good AM2 OC results, pzl do post-
Click to expand...

I have seen a few posts about mobo used on conroe are dieing.
No one has discovered the cause yet. Intel is aware of it and says is working on it.
Anyone knows why or if these are just user's F up's and nothing to do w/ conroe?

 
hm is there a correlation between the age of a specific game engine and the gains it sees when ran on a conroe? i mean "older games" like source or cod2 dont see much performance increase while oblivion or fear do. how come?
 
Holy guacamole...that's a crazy-fast FSB. The quad-pumped FSB is getting up to the speed of the base model C2D. Nice benchies.
 
I didn't bother to read but why the heck did they use different drivers for the video card? Seems a major shortcoming. I'm not saying the difference had anything to do with the drivers but usually when you want to compare something properly you need to make sure there is no possible confouding issue
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top