TeeJay1952
Golden Member
- May 28, 2004
- 1,532
- 191
- 106
Making America Great Again.It's obvious why he's doing this. It signals to all that a pardon will be available.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/12/politics/donald-trump-scooter-libby-pardon/index.html
Official: Trump expected to pardon Scooter Libby
Everyone needs to remember that Trump is Cohen's only client.
He needs a new slogan. How about PATA: Pardoning American Thugs Again?Making America Great Again.
One pardon at a time.
You do paint a picture sir! LOL! Awesome!A classic example of two pieces of shit joined at both ends, bound by the weaving of the stench, the lies, deceit and chicanery both pieces reek of.
edit - syntax
So about that pee tape...
So are you saying that you haven't seen any indictments yet?So it's almost the one year anniversary of this thread, and some 2700 posts pointing out Trumps crimes and obvious (to some) guilt. Is Cohen going to be the smoking gun? Is there some evidence of a crime that actually involves Trump? It's surprisingly difficult to find information either way that isn't based on wishful thinking and spin.
Not against Trump.So are you saying that you haven't seen any indictments yet?
Not against Trump.
So it's almost the one year anniversary of this thread, and some 2700 posts pointing out Trumps crimes and obvious (to some) guilt. Is Cohen going to be the smoking gun? Is there some evidence of a crime that actually involves Trump? It's surprisingly difficult to find information either way that isn't based on wishful thinking and spin.
Isn't it sometimes difficult to determine if a crime has been committed without an investigation?
Simply proclaiming that Hillary did nothing is every bit as stupid as proclaiming her guilt. Why not let the FBI actually look into the matter before deciding the outcome?
That's why there is an investigation.
As secretary of state, Hillary had access to a secure and probably well managed email system. Instead of using that she used an unsecured server at her home. She said no secret information passed through her private server, given that she wouldn't lie about such a thing, that means she did use the state department email for sensitive information. That leads to the next obvious question, why? Why go through the trouble of using two different systems, two different addresses, having two sets of information to correlate? Why would an intelligent, well organized person operate that way? How did she verify that someone sending her information didn't accidentally use her home email?
I can think of several reasons for her doing this, they rang from stupid to criminal. It needs to be looked at.
That's some serious rage you have going on there. Pity that it only makes you look the fool.I love exposing piece of shit hypocrites like you!
From 1/9/2016 regarding the investigation of Hillary.
8/13/2015
Of course, unlike the Hillary investigations, we have actual charges and crimes and people that have been indicted, curiously, they are all connected to trump. Lets see how this one investigation turns out, I'm sure if the Democrats launch 7 other investigations you'll show the same desire to wait and see.
I don't understand how impotent rage is a "steaming pile of STFU". It comes across as a childish tantrum to me.You just served Greenman a steaming plate of STFU. Well done. Should be embarrassed but it usually just emboldens the America haters...
Thank you for a reasoned response. While not exactly on point, it's orders of magnitude more informative than the sputtering belligerence of the last two.From the get-go of Mueller's investigation into the Trump Camp's involvement with the Russians and the peripheral crimes it has uncovered, the trend has been consistently leaning in the direction of findings of malfeasance of the highest order from most every level of Trump's hierarchy of sycophants.
It's been fascinating to witness how FOX "News" have been attempting to smear every aspect of the investigation being conducted and how they've conveniently ignored so much of the mounting evidence, convictions and cooperation being offered by former associates and cabinet members of Trump.
What's worse, if his surrogates and cabinet picks weren't directly implicated in the Russia investigation then they were invariably involved with tearing down the very fabric of the system of gov't as we knew it and all of it was definitely not for the benefit of the working class folks whose interests and concerns were either ignored or worked against in such a blatant arrogant fashion.
And to top it all off, we've had to bear the insulting and callous way the Repub led House and Senate have embarrassingly bowed to the wishes of the donor class that owns their asses and gave them what they demanded and really didn't need, even at the cost of their seats, such is the grip they have over the careers and lives of these crooked corrupted "representatives of the people".
I guess the very wealthy had a point to prove against the peasants they lord over.
Look it's hard claim trump is a saint that just happens to be sitting in the middle of a den of criminals. Just very hard to say that particularly when he's the boss of all these guys who are being indicted and pleading guilty left and right.I don't understand how impotent rage is a "steaming pile of STFU". It comes across as a childish tantrum to me.
You seem to be under the impression that your opinion is beyond reproach, that anyone who questions your decrees is an enemy that has to be stopped. But all your doing is holding your breath and kicking your feet. I asked a somewhat reasonable question, you fellows are responding with a tantrum. That isn't winning.
Fair enough. There is certainly enough evidence to assume that Trump at least had some knowledge of what was going on around him. But the point of my original post was that it's been a year, we've had 2700 posts of speculation. Some people connected to Trump are facing charges that they may or may not be convicted of, but there still isn't a credible case against Trump. What happened to the Russian collusion that started the whole thing? I can't find information about that that isn't spun out of rumor and blog posts. All I can find are extremists on either side proclaiming victory based on speculation.Look it's hard claim trump is a saint that just happens to be sitting in the middle of a den of criminals. Just very hard to say that particularly when he's the boss of all these guys who are being indicted and pleading guilty left and right.
That's pretty what mob bosses would claim. "I didn't kill this guy or whack that lady. I had nothing to do with that guy being buried in concrete and left and right their underlings would take the fall. And I don't know know where the money my accountant put in my account came from. Go ask him". At the end of the day we all knew who was responsible.
Is this true? I never knew that.Everyone needs to remember that Trump is Cohen's only client.
I dunno. Some people think the collusion thing is a white whale. Others think it's right down the pipe.Fair enough. There is certainly enough evidence to assume that Trump at least had some knowledge of what was going on around him. But the point of my original post was that it's been a year, we've had 2700 posts of speculation. Some people connected to Trump are facing charges that they may or may not be convicted of, but there still isn't a credible case against Trump. What happened to the Russian collusion that started the whole thing? I can't find information about that that isn't spun out of rumor and blog posts. All I can find are extremists on either side proclaiming victory based on speculation.
Is this true? I never knew that.
It takes a fool of extraordinary depth to deduce from ivwshane's response that he is the fool. Ya got owned biatch, it's hilarious that you don't see it.That's some serious rage you have going on there. Pity that it only makes you look the fool.
The only thing you exposed was that I didn't jump to conclusions, and that I'm apparently a fairly reasonable fellow.
Fair enough. There is certainly enough evidence to assume that Trump at least had some knowledge of what was going on around him. But the point of my original post was that it's been a year, we've had 2700 posts of speculation. Some people connected to Trump are facing charges that they may or may not be convicted of, but there still isn't a credible case against Trump. What happened to the Russian collusion that started the whole thing? I can't find information about that that isn't spun out of rumor and blog posts. All I can find are extremists on either side proclaiming victory based on speculation.