• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Indictments coming...

Page 107 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
the noose gets that much tighter....

on the one hand, i want to see trump and his organization crumble. on the other, it will hurt to know the extent to which he was compromised and yet still managed to ascend to the presidency.
 
HomerJS said:
Hey stupid. Rules say you don't name names. People are listed as "person#1, person#2". Judges were told there was a political motive for the dossier.

and BTW - just you blunt you from telling half truths, data for the dossier was paid for be Republicans first and then Democrats.
Click to expand...

You also don't misrepresent the source of "evidence" and speculate it may be politically motivated when the source was well know and then don't provide corroborating evidence that is only source from the original evidence. Keep telling yourself that some GOP entity paid for Steele and his dossier and Hillary and the DNC didn't fund it.
 
In other news, this morning there are reports that Roger Stone and Wikileaks exchanged private Twitter messages, though Stone previously denied being in direct contact with Wikileaks to the House Intel Committee.

The day after the election, Wikileaks direct messaged Roger Stone with "Happy? We are now more free to communicate."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...stones-secret-messages-with-wikileaks/554432/

Remember, Stone hinted about Podesta's "time in the barrel" before Podesta's emails were leaked by Wikileaks, suggesting he had prior knowledge of what was going on between Wikileaks and "Guccifer 2.0".

No collusion, right?
 
brandonbull said:
You also don't misrepresent the source of "evidence" and speculate it may be politically motivated when the source was well know and then don't provide corroborating evidence that is only source from the original evidence. Keep telling yourself that some GOP entity paid for Steele and his dossier and Hillary and the DNC didn't fund it.
Click to expand...
Its the rules of masking and unmasking in the FISA court. Names aren't revealed unless its relevant.

Keep misrepresenting what I said. Again data for the dossier was paid for by the Free Beacon. FB's lawyers already testified to Congress about that under oath. The dossier was compiled using that data by Steele and payments taken over by the Democrats.

You are very good at lying to yourself. Sounds like Trump.
 
Mueller asking if Trump knew about hacked Democratic emails before release
Something I have mentioned at least 30 times in the forum. Trump in public asked the Russians to hack the Democrats. Now Mueller looking into it as evidence of collusion.
Mueller's investigators have asked witnesses whether Trump was aware of plans for WikiLeaks to publish the emails. They have also asked about the relationship between GOP operative Roger Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and why Trump took policy positions favorable to Russia.
In one line of questioning, investigators have focused on Trump's public comments in July 2016 asking Russia to find emails that were deleted by his then-opponent Hillary Clinton from a private server she maintained while secretary of state. The comments came at a news conference on July 27, 2016, just days after WikiLeaks began publishing the Democratic National Committee emails. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump said.
Click to expand...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...g-what-trump-knew-about-hacked-emails-n851941
 
HomerJS said:
Its the rules of masking and unmasking in the FISA court. Names aren't revealed unless its relevant.

Keep misrepresenting what I said. Again data for the dossier was paid for by the Free Beacon. FB's lawyers already testified to Congress about that under oath. The dossier was compiled using that data by Steele and payments taken over by the Democrats.

You are very good at lying to yourself. Sounds like Trump.
Click to expand...

Steele wasn't hired until after the DNC started paying. Stop trying to misrepresent the facts because the work that the FB paid for was different than what was paid for by the DNC.
 
brandonbull said:
Steele wasn't hired until after the DNC started paying. Stop trying to misrepresent the facts because the work that the FB paid for was different than what was paid for by the DNC.
Click to expand...
Tell me why it matters who paid? Do facts change depending on who pays for their gathering?
 
brandonbull said:
Steele wasn't hired until after the DNC started paying. Stop trying to misrepresent the facts because the work that the FB paid for was different than what was paid for by the DNC.
Click to expand...
The text you just quoted.. did you read it? He said it was also funded by democrats? Are you making up the post you are replying to in your head in realtime? Is this how you guys navigate around facts you dont like? pretend its not there?
 
Well, Michael Cohen may be next in line for Indictment Bingo...
His NY Office just got raided by the FBI. It was issued by the local Federal DA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top