Indictments coming...

Page 107 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,174
12,627
136
the noose gets that much tighter....

on the one hand, i want to see trump and his organization crumble. on the other, it will hurt to know the extent to which he was compromised and yet still managed to ascend to the presidency.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,363
1,222
126
Hey stupid. Rules say you don't name names. People are listed as "person#1, person#2". Judges were told there was a political motive for the dossier.

and BTW - just you blunt you from telling half truths, data for the dossier was paid for be Republicans first and then Democrats.

You also don't misrepresent the source of "evidence" and speculate it may be politically motivated when the source was well know and then don't provide corroborating evidence that is only source from the original evidence. Keep telling yourself that some GOP entity paid for Steele and his dossier and Hillary and the DNC didn't fund it.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,470
10,071
136
In other news, this morning there are reports that Roger Stone and Wikileaks exchanged private Twitter messages, though Stone previously denied being in direct contact with Wikileaks to the House Intel Committee.

The day after the election, Wikileaks direct messaged Roger Stone with "Happy? We are now more free to communicate."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...stones-secret-messages-with-wikileaks/554432/

Remember, Stone hinted about Podesta's "time in the barrel" before Podesta's emails were leaked by Wikileaks, suggesting he had prior knowledge of what was going on between Wikileaks and "Guccifer 2.0".

No collusion, right?
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,797
12,115
136
Hope Hicks refuses to answer any questions about her time in the White House..
And the joke of a Republican house committee won't compel her to either, although they have the power, and there is no executive privilege. Republicans the party of accountability./s
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,938
32,067
136
You also don't misrepresent the source of "evidence" and speculate it may be politically motivated when the source was well know and then don't provide corroborating evidence that is only source from the original evidence. Keep telling yourself that some GOP entity paid for Steele and his dossier and Hillary and the DNC didn't fund it.
Its the rules of masking and unmasking in the FISA court. Names aren't revealed unless its relevant.

Keep misrepresenting what I said. Again data for the dossier was paid for by the Free Beacon. FB's lawyers already testified to Congress about that under oath. The dossier was compiled using that data by Steele and payments taken over by the Democrats.

You are very good at lying to yourself. Sounds like Trump.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,938
32,067
136
Mueller asking if Trump knew about hacked Democratic emails before release
Something I have mentioned at least 30 times in the forum. Trump in public asked the Russians to hack the Democrats. Now Mueller looking into it as evidence of collusion.
Mueller's investigators have asked witnesses whether Trump was aware of plans for WikiLeaks to publish the emails. They have also asked about the relationship between GOP operative Roger Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and why Trump took policy positions favorable to Russia.
In one line of questioning, investigators have focused on Trump's public comments in July 2016 asking Russia to find emails that were deleted by his then-opponent Hillary Clinton from a private server she maintained while secretary of state. The comments came at a news conference on July 27, 2016, just days after WikiLeaks began publishing the Democratic National Committee emails. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump said.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...g-what-trump-knew-about-hacked-emails-n851941
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,740
31,105
146
  • Like
Reactions: Hugo Stiglitz

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,363
1,222
126
Its the rules of masking and unmasking in the FISA court. Names aren't revealed unless its relevant.

Keep misrepresenting what I said. Again data for the dossier was paid for by the Free Beacon. FB's lawyers already testified to Congress about that under oath. The dossier was compiled using that data by Steele and payments taken over by the Democrats.

You are very good at lying to yourself. Sounds like Trump.

Steele wasn't hired until after the DNC started paying. Stop trying to misrepresent the facts because the work that the FB paid for was different than what was paid for by the DNC.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Steele wasn't hired until after the DNC started paying. Stop trying to misrepresent the facts because the work that the FB paid for was different than what was paid for by the DNC.
Tell me why it matters who paid? Do facts change depending on who pays for their gathering?
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,893
15,352
136
Steele wasn't hired until after the DNC started paying. Stop trying to misrepresent the facts because the work that the FB paid for was different than what was paid for by the DNC.
The text you just quoted.. did you read it? He said it was also funded by democrats? Are you making up the post you are replying to in your head in realtime? Is this how you guys navigate around facts you dont like? pretend its not there?
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Well, Michael Cohen may be next in line for Indictment Bingo...
His NY Office just got raided by the FBI. It was issued by the local Federal DA.