I was hit in a traffic accident

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ndee

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
12,680
1
0
can we get an OWNED? :D that's just ATOT, he's pissed off cuz he had an accident, he posts the accident to get some sympathy and everybody just flames his a$$ :D btw, it WAS your fault.... dumbo ;)
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: Evadman
How the hell is this not your fault? I don't understand. You misjudged traffic, and moved out to cross trafic when you shouldn't have.

You said there was a hill 100 yards away right? There is no way there was a blind hill 100 yards from a stop light. IIRC the minimum is well over 500. But lets assume you are a good judge of distance (which obviously you are not, but hey.) Lets do some math. The maximum grade is 6% for intersections. Assuming this was a real small truck, lets say 6' tall. At maximum grade, the oncoming car would have been visible for 400 feet by your own admission.

place about 2 miles from me has a dike 50 yards from the intersection :)

what probably happened is the girl was on the other side of the oncoming cars turning left, and dude didn't see it.
 

Argo

Lifer
Apr 8, 2000
10,045
0
0
I actually had something similar happen yesterday. I was about take take a right on red on intersection. There was a car coming from my left, but he was in right turn only lane, so I assumed he was gonna turn into my street and therefore I started making the turn. Well, the fella decided to go through and barely stopped in time to avoid hitting me. After exchanging our warm regards for one another we went our own ways, however, had there been an accident I probably would've been at fault, even though unofficially it's completely his fault.

The reason though - the rule states when not having the right of way it's your obligation not to cause an accident. Even if another person is breaking the law.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
OK I'm pretty sure some of the figures were made up in that lengthy math post. Do you have a source for it? 500 feet is an awfully large number. I am willing to wager it also depends on the city and/or state even if it is 500 feet. 500 feet would be like in kansas where they only have 2 hills.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Pics of roadway so we can judge just how far "100 Yards" is, and whether this blind hill is dangerously close to the intersection?
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Besed on the original post description it sounds like you turned into the oncoming traffic lane, then stopped there when you saw her coming.

Otherwise I don't understand how you could get hit in the right front corner..if you were moving and got hit there you would have to start into the intersection when you she was almost already on top of you, not 100 yards away.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Evadman
How the hell is this not your fault? I don't understand. You misjudged traffic, and moved out to cross trafic when you shouldn't have.

You said there was a hill 100 yards away right? There is no way there was a blind hill 100 yards from a stop light. IIRC the minimum is well over 500. But lets assume you are a good judge of distance (which obviously you are not, but hey.) Lets do some math. The maximum grade is 6% for intersections. Assuming this was a real small truck, lets say 6' tall. At maximum grade, the oncoming car would have been visible for 400 feet by your own admission.

place about 2 miles from me has a dike 50 yards from the intersection :)

what probably happened is the girl was on the other side of the oncoming cars turning left, and dude didn't see it.

that's what I was thinking when he added "other cars turning left"

Meaning he doesn't know how to drive. number 1 rule - don't put your car in the path of other cars if you can't see the path of other cars.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: theNEOone
here's footage from the intersection on the day of jehovah's accident.


=|

now why did I see that coming?

Face it. You failed to yield right of way, couldn't see the other car, pulled out in front of it and are totally at fault.

Next time you'll know.
 

TechnoKid

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2001
5,575
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: theNEOone
here's footage from the intersection on the day of jehovah's accident.


=|

Holy crap, that car got pounded. No stop sign for the pickup either - WTF was that dumbass thinking?

- M4H

im thinking since he saw the conversion van go through he neglected to see the truck to his left, and thought it was clear to go through. needless to say, i bet that intersection now has a 4 way stop sign.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: TechnoKid
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: theNEOone
here's footage from the intersection on the day of jehovah's accident.


=|

Holy crap, that car got pounded. No stop sign for the pickup either - WTF was that dumbass thinking?

- M4H

im thinking since he saw the conversion van go through he neglected to see the truck to his left, and thought it was clear to go through. needless to say, i bet that intersection now has a 4 way stop sign.

You'd like to think that people crossing a 55mph highway would, y'know, look first, but some people are just stupid and can't drive. At least the pickup driver wasn't injured.

- M4H
 

TechnoKid

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2001
5,575
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: TechnoKid
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: theNEOone
here's footage from the intersection on the day of jehovah's accident.


=|

Holy crap, that car got pounded. No stop sign for the pickup either - WTF was that dumbass thinking?

- M4H

im thinking since he saw the conversion van go through he neglected to see the truck to his left, and thought it was clear to go through. needless to say, i bet that intersection now has a 4 way stop sign.

You'd like to think that people crossing a 55mph highway would, y'know, look first, but some people are just stupid and can't drive. At least the pickup driver wasn't injured.

- M4H


looking at the video more closely reveals he is looking to his right while he is crossing the intersection, so i think he looked left first and musta had a moment of blindensss.
 

virtueixi

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2003
2,781
0
0
For those of you say that speed doesn't matter, don't you remeber that guy who got charged with vehicular homicide, after speeding and hitting a car coming out it's driveway, killing both occupants?
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,353
1,862
126
Well ... if she hit your car that hard ... you could try to use physics to prove she was driving well above the posted speed limmit at the time of the impact .... if its a 35 zone, and she was doin 65 ... then you ought to have a pretty good case.
 

LongAce

Senior member
Mar 26, 2001
726
0
0
It wouldn't matter because you did fail to give right of way. It sucks when your fault but in this case, it really is.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
Well ... if she hit your car that hard ... you could try to use physics to prove she was driving well above the posted speed limmit at the time of the impact .... if its a 35 zone, and she was doin 65 ... then you ought to have a pretty good case.


Not really.

The most that could really happen is that the other driver would be cited for speeding. It doesn't matter if the other person is driving backwords, drunk, speeding, doing 10MPH or doing a series of dounuts down the street, as long as there is traffic moving in the opposite direction, they have the right of way.

Yes it sucks, but any citation is pretty much worth challenging in court. Even my uncle, a police officer says so. I mean, if you get a speeding ticket, you can tell the officer that you will plead guilty if they change the citation to something like disordly conduct. Doesn't mean they will always go for it, but if you can get them to, it's better than having points on your license.

In the case of a wreck it is a bit different because you can't have the charges changed, but it's worth the couple hundred to spend on a lawyer if you can possibly get out of paying an extra grand in insurance for the next few years.
 

tm37

Lifer
Jan 24, 2001
12,436
1
0
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Jehovah
Basically, I was hit during a left turn in an intersection by a truck in oncoming traffic, and apparently, it's automatically my fault, even though I checked for two full seconds before I made the turn, and the girl was gunning it down the road. I mean, I was hit on the front right corner of my car, I was barely starting to move, and she hit me so hard that my car was facing backwards by the time the car stopped.

I have no witnesses, and speaking to a friend of mine who handles these types of things for insurance, I practically have no chance of winning, even if I took it to court. I was cited for not giving the right of way, and she was scot free.

This basically means that I'll have to pay for all the damage, even though it's her fvcking fault she hit me.

Fvcking ridiculous.


ummm no,
if you have a police report describing the skid marks and position of your car any good lawyer can argue that she was speeding.

Hell any bad lawer could make the same arguement. However that does not change the fact that regardless of her speed he failed to yield.
 

nitsuj3580

Platinum Member
Jun 13, 2001
2,668
14
81
Listen you fvcktards, I said that there was a hill 100 yards in front of me, and cars opposite me in the middle lane - the opposite lane was empty for two full seconds before I made the turn, and as I was turning, the chick came over the hill, was obviously speeding, and she hit me before I could react.

How the fvck was it my fault? She ran into me while speeding! If she had obeyed the speeding law even, she very well could have stopped herself!

This is hilarious.

You think waiting two FULL seconds gives you privileges? It may have been clear on those 2 seconds but obviously on the 3rd second, it was not ok to go.

Even if she wasn't speeding, you think she would have stopped for you? She was going straight! She has the right of way, nuff said.

It sounds like a tough situation with the hill and all and a speeding driver on the other end, but it's your fault. Come to grips with that.