• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HTC One X and One S reviews

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
RaistlinZ said:
The Sprint look isn't that sexy, but it does have larger battery, micro SD slot, dedicated camera button, kickstand, camera lens that doesn't protrude as much. Functionally, it offers more than the One X.

And it's not like you spend a lot of time gazing at the back of your phone anyway.
...
Click to expand...

It does solve a bunch of problems that the original shouldn't have suffered from.
There's no excuse for not having an sd slot and HTC have been notorious for bad battery life.
The design doesn't look that bad, given a free choice I'd probably pick the bigger battery and extended storage.
 
SandEagle said:
well, i like to point out the obvious, obviously. 🙂 sucks though. wanted the quad, but i'm going to settle on the One S
Click to expand...

From the benchmarks shown the S4 seems to be better than the tegra 3 in the cpu department even though it's dual core vs the quad in tegra 3, so personally I'm just waiting to see how the gpu will handle 720p in the One X.
 
The Snapdragon S4 is a dual core next generation processor. The Tegra 3 is just 4 current gen Cortex A9s(exact same thing that is in stuff like the iPhone 4S, Galaxy Nexus, SGS2, Droid Razr and Bionic).
 
There is no excuse for a Pentile LCD display, especially not one that size. Surely HTC wouldn't be stupid enough to put that in their flagship.
 
Puddle Jumper said:
There is no excuse for a Pentile LCD display, especially not one that size. Surely HTC wouldn't be stupid enough to put that in their flagship.
Click to expand...

HTC has proven itself plenty stupid in the past, up to and including the exclusion of a micro SD slot and user replaceable battery in the entire One line.

And don't get me started on the aesthetics of the new Evo 4G LTE. I realize that's subjective, but ugh. It's just bad.
 
Headcase_Fargone said:
HTC has proven itself plenty stupid in the past, up to and including the exclusion of a micro SD slot and user replaceable battery in the entire One line.

And don't get me started on the aesthetics of the new Evo 4G LTE. I realize that's subjective, but ugh. It's just bad.
Click to expand...

The front looks good but the rear is ugly.
 
I don't think the EVO will be pentile, why would they source two different 4.7" 720 SLCD screens?
 
dguy6789 said:
Or maybe the One X is also pentile and nobody mentioned it yet.
Click to expand...

That's what I'm wondering, too. I mean for the hate pentile gets, you think some review would have mentioned it. Also, I think that'd be plenty stupid to make a completely different display just for that Sprint version. I'm assuming it's not pentile, and the HTC rep misspoke or we just haven't heard the correct info yet..

Let's ask the Verge and a few other sites like BGR if they've heard anything about it being pentile or not.
 
dlock13 said:
That's what I'm wondering, too. I mean for the hate pentile gets, you think some review would have mentioned it. Also, I think that'd be plenty stupid to make a completely different display just for that Sprint version. I'm assuming it's not pentile, and the HTC rep misspoke or we just haven't heard the correct info yet..

Let's ask the Verge and a few other sites like BGR if they've heard anything about it being pentile or not.
Click to expand...

The verge says it's non pentile in their review too (from the verge's review):
" It also lacks the infamous pentile subpixel arrangement commonly employed on high-resolution AMOLEDs like that found on the One S, and it runs circles around the Galaxy Nexus's 4.65-inch Super AMOLED for overall quality."
 
The front looks good but the rear is ugly.
Click to expand...

Just like my ex. Hiyoooo!


dlock13 said:
That's what I'm wondering, too. I mean for the hate pentile gets, you think some review would have mentioned it. Also, I think that'd be plenty stupid to make a completely different display just for that Sprint version. I'm assuming it's not pentile, and the HTC rep misspoke or we just haven't heard the correct info yet..

Let's ask the Verge and a few other sites like BGR if they've heard anything about it being pentile or not.
Click to expand...

Perhaps they had to cut costs to make up for the extra things Sprint wanted, or even just the added cost of having a physically different model. And the screen took the brunt of the tradeoff.
 
GTaudiophile said:
Engadget has posted a S vs. X review.

I am confused about the "S" and its functionality with TMO USA. Edge works. So-called 4G works? But 3G does not?
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/htc-one-x-vs-one-s/
Click to expand...
The international versions don't support AWS frequencies (UMTS1700). Neither will give acceptable data speeds on TMobile's network.
The OneXL and the T-Mo OneS both support AWS, and the OneXL aka ATT's OneX supports LTE1700, which ATT and TMobile are both building networks on. International versions are out, US Carrier rebrands are in for T-Mobile users. (international OneXL will work however).

Personally as an ATT customer, The OneXL and SGSIII are the only 2 contenders for the next x months to replace my SGSII.
 
Last edited:
ilkhan said:
The international versions don't support AWS frequencies (UMTS1700). Neither will give acceptable data speeds on TMobile's network.
The OneXL and the T-Mo OneS both support AWS, and the OneXL aka ATT's OneX supports LTE1700, which ATT and TMobile are both building networks on. International versions are out, US Carrier rebrands are in for T-Mobile users. (international OneXL will work however).

Personally as an ATT customer, The OneXL and SGSIII are the only 2 contenders for the next x months to replace my SGSII.
Click to expand...

T-Mobile has finally jumped on the LTE bandwagon? Since when?
 
Doesn't the ASUS Padfone use Krait as well?
Why would anyone get this over the ASUS Padfone? (I'm only asking because I have a positive opinion about the ASUS brand and their record on the Android Transformer seems squeaky clean besides the "wireless" issue which can be easily fixed)

...besides it not being out yet or a US road map, but it will be released in Taiwan the end of this month.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/asus-padfone-priced-and-ready-for-pre-order-in-taiwan-tomorrow/

Is the ASUS Padfone without the advertised "Padfone" station completely useless?
 
ilkhan said:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/t-mobile-lost-more-customers-in-q4-will-launch-lte-in-2013-with/

Its not released yet, but they've announced the plans and the frequencies it will use.
Click to expand...

That's a LONG wait...
I figure if they are not going to start until 2013, don't expect them to finish roll outs until 2015.
Verizon should finish it's rollouts this year or by this time next year, and AT&T a year later from that since they started late.

Anyone getting an HTC OneX(L) now simply because it "could" be compatible with T-Mobile's LTE network a year later could be in for a shocker announcement that it's not compatible with the network, not to mention the phone could "almost" be obsolete by then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top