Originally posted by: Rustler
Why is it that so many people from Canada come here for sugery and procedures that their Socalized medicine won't take care of...............and an added bonus if you are elderly and get a disease socalized medicine can choose not to treat you............and if it is a terminal illness then there is lots of tax revenue from the death tax...........
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720
That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.
GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: seemingly random
But a trillion dollar war is good. Just so you know where your priorities lay.Originally posted by: quest55720
I am not a member of the GOP but very scared of Obama/Pelosi/Reid with no checks on them. I don't think 4 year experiment in socialism is what this country needs at this time. I don't want my choice of doctors taken away by the government and some shitty expensive UHC. I don't want to see money given away to those on the lower end. I am fine with them paying no federal taxes but no way they should get a check from Obama. I don't want to a trillion dollars in new social spending under Obama.
Don't like the war either. Love to get out of both wars and use the money to balance the budget. This government gets more than enough money right now. It is time to get spending under control.
So the Republicans get to spend wildly and only kill people in the process, but the democrats are now not allowed to spend for people's health because of this?
Exactly 10 trillion in the hole means there is no money for any new expensive projects. This is the democrats fault they could of put up anyone but kerry in 2004 and stopped bush. Now if you get the boarders and budget under control we can talk UHC. The government has already fucked up SS,Medicare and Medicaid. No way I want them to be in charge of my health care. The government has not earned that right. I trust the evil insurance companies more than this corrupt government.
It is the democrats' fault because they had a bad nominee, not the republicans who controleld congress for 12 years and had a supermajority for 6... and therefore we should all suffer and the democrats should have restrictions? Right.
You trust the companies that won't give my family insurance... The same ones that would have no problem denying people cancer treatment, etc. There will be a special place for your fear mongering selfishness in the afterlife.
Congress can put in health care for people in your situation. The rest of us should not have to suffer with crappy UHC. This country has unique circumstances that prevent UHC from ever working until they change. Any UHC would either bankrupt the country or triple the tax rate to pay for it. You triple the tax rate and you bankrupt many people and force them on the street.
That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.
There you go.
That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.
Don't make assumptions on Obama's abilities.
Canada/England only pay an extra 6% in taxes for uhc and that covers everything. We paid 17% of our income on full insurance when we had it.
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720
That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.
GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.
Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720
That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.
GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.
Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: seemingly random
But a trillion dollar war is good. Just so you know where your priorities lay.Originally posted by: quest55720
I am not a member of the GOP but very scared of Obama/Pelosi/Reid with no checks on them. I don't think 4 year experiment in socialism is what this country needs at this time. I don't want my choice of doctors taken away by the government and some shitty expensive UHC. I don't want to see money given away to those on the lower end. I am fine with them paying no federal taxes but no way they should get a check from Obama. I don't want to a trillion dollars in new social spending under Obama.
Don't like the war either. Love to get out of both wars and use the money to balance the budget. This government gets more than enough money right now. It is time to get spending under control.
So the Republicans get to spend wildly and only kill people in the process, but the democrats are now not allowed to spend for people's health because of this?
Exactly 10 trillion in the hole means there is no money for any new expensive projects. This is the democrats fault they could of put up anyone but kerry in 2004 and stopped bush. Now if you get the boarders and budget under control we can talk UHC. The government has already fucked up SS,Medicare and Medicaid. No way I want them to be in charge of my health care. The government has not earned that right. I trust the evil insurance companies more than this corrupt government.
It is the democrats' fault because they had a bad nominee, not the republicans who controleld congress for 12 years and had a supermajority for 6... and therefore we should all suffer and the democrats should have restrictions? Right.
You trust the companies that won't give my family insurance... The same ones that would have no problem denying people cancer treatment, etc. There will be a special place for your fear mongering selfishness in the afterlife.
Congress can put in health care for people in your situation. The rest of us should not have to suffer with crappy UHC. This country has unique circumstances that prevent UHC from ever working until they change. Any UHC would either bankrupt the country or triple the tax rate to pay for it. You triple the tax rate and you bankrupt many people and force them on the street.
That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.
There you go.
That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.
Don't make assumptions on Obama's abilities.
Canada/England only pay an extra 6% in taxes for uhc and that covers everything. We paid 17% of our income on full insurance when we had it.
Does england have 10s of millions of illegals? The cost of illegals alone would cost as much as the english pay. At a minumum triple what the english pay and I am sorry a 18% tax hike is something we can't afford for second rate UHC coverage.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720
That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.
GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.
Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.
His party has been opposing Bush.. would you have him do the opposite and vote with Bush?
Come on, let's not be willfully ignorant here.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Partially, but only because they've been sheltered and have really never had to work for much of anything. When someone fails at something their instinct has been to cry about unfairness rather than give someone a kick in the ass.
I have 2 nephews: both majored in sociology or something similar. 1 has already boomeranged back to his parents house and the other is on his way to doing so. It's sad really.
Are you suggesting there are no poor people who have to work hard to get out of their condition anymore?
The 'poor' people in this generation are running around with I-phones.
What's making them poor? They don't pay much for healthcare. They're better educated than previous generations.
In your world everyone is rich, including the poor, and no one dies of health problems with their low cost healthcare... I can't argue with that.
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Thats kind of like this story... I call it a tale of a lib and a con.
Once upon a time there was a great prince that became king and led his kingdom from financial turmoil and record budget deficits to record growth and a surplus. Sadly then that king's time ended and the people of the great land elected a new king... That new king brought financial peril to the great land and turned that record growth and surplus into recession and record deficits even higher than than ever known before.
I will leave it to you to figure out who the players are. Hint: they are recent presidents =)
Now a new one comes along trying to change the tax code back to the way it was when we were prosperous and you rail against it.
Why? do you hate America, or just hate us being prosperous?
Thanks for that tale of utter crap and showing that correlation doesn't prove causation!
Hint: Clinton cut taxes in his 2nd term before the late 90s boom. And hint: He was lucky enough to get out before shit hit the fan.
Actually he, and his policies were largely responsible for the boom... According to the 2 previous fed chiefs... Which, in my opinion, know a bit more than you about the economy.
http://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/Ac...nts/eightyears-03.html
Clinton-Gore Economic Policy Has Dramatically Improved the Economy
"My colleagues and I have been very appreciative of your [President Clinton?s] support of the Fed over the years, and your commitment to fiscal discipline has been instrumental in achieving what in a few weeks will be the longest economic expansion in the nation?s history."
? Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve Board Chairman, January 4, 2000, with President Clinton at Chairman Greenspan?s re-nomination announcement
"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits."
? Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994
Originally posted by: chess9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Partially, but only because they've been sheltered and have really never had to work for much of anything. When someone fails at something their instinct has been to cry about unfairness rather than give someone a kick in the ass.
I have 2 nephews: both majored in sociology or something similar. 1 has already boomeranged back to his parents house and the other is on his way to doing so. It's sad really.
Are you suggesting there are no poor people who have to work hard to get out of their condition anymore?
The 'poor' people in this generation are running around with I-phones.
What's making them poor? They don't pay much for healthcare. They're better educated than previous generations.
Yes, but their iPhones are less than 1% of their GDP, so it's not real money.
-Robert
Originally posted by: winnar111
You know Alan Greenspan supported the Bush tax cuts and recently admitted fault for causing the current recession, right?
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.
There you go.
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: quest55720
Sure for the rich they can have personal coverage. The rest of us will be stuck with second rate health care. Of those 50 million how many are young people who choose not to get insurance or illegals? You going to pay for cancer treatments for all of south America? The second UHC is passed millions will cross the boarder for free expensive treatments on my tax dollar. Any UHC plan will cost 2 to 3 times as much as any other country because of the illegals and population in such poor health.
Illegals already get free health care except it is much more expensive because they are currently only left with the option of going to the emergency room. Give them health care so that they can visit general practitioners and you will see the costs go down.
My proof is my own eyes. I live in south florida. Shall I describe to you what happens at the hospitals down here and what it costs thanks to them having no other choice when little Jose gets very ill and needs medical attention? I don't think I need to.
No it won't because instead of stablizing treatments or emergency treatments. You will be giving away cancer treatments that can cost millions per person. The boarder will flood the second UHC passes. Anyone in south america with a bad disease will come across the boarder getting millions in free treatments.
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.
There you go.
Except pre-existing conditions only drive the price on insurance up.....grats!
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: chess9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Partially, but only because they've been sheltered and have really never had to work for much of anything. When someone fails at something their instinct has been to cry about unfairness rather than give someone a kick in the ass.
I have 2 nephews: both majored in sociology or something similar. 1 has already boomeranged back to his parents house and the other is on his way to doing so. It's sad really.
Are you suggesting there are no poor people who have to work hard to get out of their condition anymore?
The 'poor' people in this generation are running around with I-phones.
What's making them poor? They don't pay much for healthcare. They're better educated than previous generations.
Yes, but their iPhones are less than 1% of their GDP, so it's not real money.
-Robert
Really; An Iphone is $300, not to mention another $300-600 in monthly fees.
If you're in your 20s and make 60k, you don't have a healthcare problem.
Originally posted by: winnar111
Really; An Iphone is $300, not to mention another $300-600 in monthly fees.
If you're in your 20s and make 60k, you don't have a healthcare problem.
Originally posted by: Rustler
The illegals clog our emergency services here in AZ and it makes it is very expensive and the Feds don't pick up the Tab since it is their responsibility to control the borders which they don't do......................
Originally posted by: Genx87
Why are people so scared of an Obama presidency?
Not scared of an Obama presidency, scared of an Obama presidency with a super majority.
Free to do whatever the hell they(dems) want.
Originally posted by: Rustler
The illegals clog our emergency services here in AZ and it makes it is very expensive and the Feds don't pick up the Tab since it is their responsibility to control the borders which they don't do......................
