• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

How Scared is the GOP of an Obama win?

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,990
3,346
146
Feering obama is utterly stupid. Fearing Bush was not. Bush is a fundamentalist christian and all fundamentalists are fucking scary.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Rustler
Why is it that so many people from Canada come here for sugery and procedures that their Socalized medicine won't take care of...............and an added bonus if you are elderly and get a disease socalized medicine can choose not to treat you............and if it is a terminal illness then there is lots of tax revenue from the death tax...........

Proof? How about a link?
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720

That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.

GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.

Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: quest55720
I am not a member of the GOP but very scared of Obama/Pelosi/Reid with no checks on them. I don't think 4 year experiment in socialism is what this country needs at this time. I don't want my choice of doctors taken away by the government and some shitty expensive UHC. I don't want to see money given away to those on the lower end. I am fine with them paying no federal taxes but no way they should get a check from Obama. I don't want to a trillion dollars in new social spending under Obama.
But a trillion dollar war is good. Just so you know where your priorities lay.

Don't like the war either. Love to get out of both wars and use the money to balance the budget. This government gets more than enough money right now. It is time to get spending under control.

So the Republicans get to spend wildly and only kill people in the process, but the democrats are now not allowed to spend for people's health because of this?

Exactly 10 trillion in the hole means there is no money for any new expensive projects. This is the democrats fault they could of put up anyone but kerry in 2004 and stopped bush. Now if you get the boarders and budget under control we can talk UHC. The government has already fucked up SS,Medicare and Medicaid. No way I want them to be in charge of my health care. The government has not earned that right. I trust the evil insurance companies more than this corrupt government.

It is the democrats' fault because they had a bad nominee, not the republicans who controleld congress for 12 years and had a supermajority for 6... and therefore we should all suffer and the democrats should have restrictions? Right.

You trust the companies that won't give my family insurance... The same ones that would have no problem denying people cancer treatment, etc. There will be a special place for your fear mongering selfishness in the afterlife.

Congress can put in health care for people in your situation. The rest of us should not have to suffer with crappy UHC. This country has unique circumstances that prevent UHC from ever working until they change. Any UHC would either bankrupt the country or triple the tax rate to pay for it. You triple the tax rate and you bankrupt many people and force them on the street.

That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.

There you go.

That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.

Don't make assumptions on Obama's abilities.

Canada/England only pay an extra 6% in taxes for uhc and that covers everything. We paid 17% of our income on full insurance when we had it.


Does england have 10s of millions of illegals? The cost of illegals alone would cost as much as the english pay. At a minumum triple what the english pay and I am sorry a 18% tax hike is something we can't afford for second rate UHC coverage.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,983
55,386
136
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720

That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.

GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.

Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.

You are attempting to use the actions of a junior senator seeking the support of his party in running for higher office to someone occupying an adversarial branch of government with no further need of that support. It's foolish.
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
Tired of repeating this

If you have insurance through your employer, nothing will change other than trying to squash unnecessary cost drivers thus making it cheaper, nothing else will change.

Vs. McCain's plan which will DESTROY the employer based healthcare system altogether.

The rest is pure FUD.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720

That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.

GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.

Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.

His party has been opposing Bush.. would you have him do the opposite and vote with Bush?

Come on, let's not be willfully ignorant here.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: quest55720
I am not a member of the GOP but very scared of Obama/Pelosi/Reid with no checks on them. I don't think 4 year experiment in socialism is what this country needs at this time. I don't want my choice of doctors taken away by the government and some shitty expensive UHC. I don't want to see money given away to those on the lower end. I am fine with them paying no federal taxes but no way they should get a check from Obama. I don't want to a trillion dollars in new social spending under Obama.
But a trillion dollar war is good. Just so you know where your priorities lay.

Don't like the war either. Love to get out of both wars and use the money to balance the budget. This government gets more than enough money right now. It is time to get spending under control.

So the Republicans get to spend wildly and only kill people in the process, but the democrats are now not allowed to spend for people's health because of this?

Exactly 10 trillion in the hole means there is no money for any new expensive projects. This is the democrats fault they could of put up anyone but kerry in 2004 and stopped bush. Now if you get the boarders and budget under control we can talk UHC. The government has already fucked up SS,Medicare and Medicaid. No way I want them to be in charge of my health care. The government has not earned that right. I trust the evil insurance companies more than this corrupt government.

It is the democrats' fault because they had a bad nominee, not the republicans who controleld congress for 12 years and had a supermajority for 6... and therefore we should all suffer and the democrats should have restrictions? Right.

You trust the companies that won't give my family insurance... The same ones that would have no problem denying people cancer treatment, etc. There will be a special place for your fear mongering selfishness in the afterlife.

Congress can put in health care for people in your situation. The rest of us should not have to suffer with crappy UHC. This country has unique circumstances that prevent UHC from ever working until they change. Any UHC would either bankrupt the country or triple the tax rate to pay for it. You triple the tax rate and you bankrupt many people and force them on the street.

That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.

There you go.

That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.

Don't make assumptions on Obama's abilities.

Canada/England only pay an extra 6% in taxes for uhc and that covers everything. We paid 17% of our income on full insurance when we had it.


Does england have 10s of millions of illegals? The cost of illegals alone would cost as much as the english pay. At a minumum triple what the english pay and I am sorry a 18% tax hike is something we can't afford for second rate UHC coverage.

You are again making the numbers support what you've already made up your mind to entail.

Illegals obviously wouldn't be covered, period. If they can do it for 6%, so can we.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: quest55720

That might be the Obama plan but it is not the Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy plan. Obama does not have the guts to veto a UHC plan. With 58-60 seats in the senate UHC is coming if Obama wins on Tuesday. And crippling taxes is coming with it.

GUYS DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF SOME STUFF I MADE UP ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING TO DO LATER.

Find me in his past where he has stood up to his party. Obama goes with his party every single time or votes present. Now if Obama had a history of standing up to his party I would feel differently. There is nothing in his resume that shows he would be a strong leader and force congress to pass his agenda by use of the veto. If you go by his resume he will be nothing but a rubber stamp who will sign any bill congress sends his way. I am not going to put my hopes on Obama suddenly getting a set of balls.

His party has been opposing Bush.. would you have him do the opposite and vote with Bush?

Come on, let's not be willfully ignorant here.

He could of stood up to frank and dodd over freddie and fannie. Instead he took money to help dodd and frank kill regulations of fannie and freddie. Obama should of stood up to his party over that issue but sided with the crooks.

 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Partially, but only because they've been sheltered and have really never had to work for much of anything. When someone fails at something their instinct has been to cry about unfairness rather than give someone a kick in the ass.

I have 2 nephews: both majored in sociology or something similar. 1 has already boomeranged back to his parents house and the other is on his way to doing so. It's sad really.

Are you suggesting there are no poor people who have to work hard to get out of their condition anymore?

The 'poor' people in this generation are running around with I-phones.

What's making them poor? They don't pay much for healthcare. They're better educated than previous generations.

In your world everyone is rich, including the poor, and no one dies of health problems with their low cost healthcare... I can't argue with that.

There is no such thing as modern low cost healthcare. If you want low cost stuff, exclude everything invented in the past 15 years.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Thats kind of like this story... I call it a tale of a lib and a con.

Once upon a time there was a great prince that became king and led his kingdom from financial turmoil and record budget deficits to record growth and a surplus. Sadly then that king's time ended and the people of the great land elected a new king... That new king brought financial peril to the great land and turned that record growth and surplus into recession and record deficits even higher than than ever known before.

I will leave it to you to figure out who the players are. Hint: they are recent presidents =)

Now a new one comes along trying to change the tax code back to the way it was when we were prosperous and you rail against it.

Why? do you hate America, or just hate us being prosperous?

Thanks for that tale of utter crap and showing that correlation doesn't prove causation!

Hint: Clinton cut taxes in his 2nd term before the late 90s boom. And hint: He was lucky enough to get out before shit hit the fan.

Actually he, and his policies were largely responsible for the boom... According to the 2 previous fed chiefs... Which, in my opinion, know a bit more than you about the economy.

http://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/Ac...nts/eightyears-03.html


Clinton-Gore Economic Policy Has Dramatically Improved the Economy

"My colleagues and I have been very appreciative of your [President Clinton?s] support of the Fed over the years, and your commitment to fiscal discipline has been instrumental in achieving what in a few weeks will be the longest economic expansion in the nation?s history."
? Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve Board Chairman, January 4, 2000, with President Clinton at Chairman Greenspan?s re-nomination announcement

"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits."
? Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994

You know Alan Greenspan supported the Bush tax cuts and recently admitted fault for causing the current recession, right?
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: chess9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Partially, but only because they've been sheltered and have really never had to work for much of anything. When someone fails at something their instinct has been to cry about unfairness rather than give someone a kick in the ass.

I have 2 nephews: both majored in sociology or something similar. 1 has already boomeranged back to his parents house and the other is on his way to doing so. It's sad really.

Are you suggesting there are no poor people who have to work hard to get out of their condition anymore?

The 'poor' people in this generation are running around with I-phones.

What's making them poor? They don't pay much for healthcare. They're better educated than previous generations.

Yes, but their iPhones are less than 1% of their GDP, so it's not real money. ;)

-Robert

Really; An Iphone is $300, not to mention another $300-600 in monthly fees.

If you're in your 20s and make 60k, you don't have a healthcare problem.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: winnar111

You know Alan Greenspan supported the Bush tax cuts and recently admitted fault for causing the current recession, right?

Didn't Greenspan say they should have raised interest rates instead of cutting them?
 

Rustler

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2004
1,253
1
81
I am here in Arizona and we have Janet N as our governor she is a Barak Supporter and we have the Largest budget deficit ever here in the State of Arizona, there is no control of spending here..............same as the problem in Wasington.............we need to control spending.................we are gonna give everyone health care a chicken in every pot ect ect ect.....................and not do a damn thing about spending..........
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.

There you go.

Except pre-existing conditions only drive the price on insurance up.....grats!
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: quest55720
Sure for the rich they can have personal coverage. The rest of us will be stuck with second rate health care. Of those 50 million how many are young people who choose not to get insurance or illegals? You going to pay for cancer treatments for all of south America? The second UHC is passed millions will cross the boarder for free expensive treatments on my tax dollar. Any UHC plan will cost 2 to 3 times as much as any other country because of the illegals and population in such poor health.

Illegals already get free health care except it is much more expensive because they are currently only left with the option of going to the emergency room. Give them health care so that they can visit general practitioners and you will see the costs go down.

My proof is my own eyes. I live in south florida. Shall I describe to you what happens at the hospitals down here and what it costs thanks to them having no other choice when little Jose gets very ill and needs medical attention? I don't think I need to.


No it won't because instead of stablizing treatments or emergency treatments. You will be giving away cancer treatments that can cost millions per person. The boarder will flood the second UHC passes. Anyone in south america with a bad disease will come across the boarder getting millions in free treatments.

Since we are talking about wasteful spending etc. let me give you an example of what your tax dollars and my tax dollars are subsidizing....

I have a friend who is a nurse at Grady hospital in Atlanta. Recently there was a woman who was flown in from Africa on a major airline (essentially given a 1 way ticket by her family) to be sent to America. This woman had advanced AIDS and could barely walk. Guess what? After the plane landed in Atlanta, an ambulance was called and she landed at Grady. She got 6 months of treatment before she died. The cost was astronomical. And the bottom line is, she didn't have insurance, nor did she even need it. Your tax dollars at work.

 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
That is exactly Obama's plan, if you watched the debates. Give an option for affordable healthcare THAT DOES NOT EXCLUDE PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS. Everyone else can keep their insurance and he will give incentives for small business to insure people.

There you go.

Except pre-existing conditions only drive the price on insurance up.....grats!

Right because if you have a genetic disorder you should just fucking die.

please keep posting and show us your Culture of Life.
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: chess9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: winnar111
Partially, but only because they've been sheltered and have really never had to work for much of anything. When someone fails at something their instinct has been to cry about unfairness rather than give someone a kick in the ass.

I have 2 nephews: both majored in sociology or something similar. 1 has already boomeranged back to his parents house and the other is on his way to doing so. It's sad really.

Are you suggesting there are no poor people who have to work hard to get out of their condition anymore?

The 'poor' people in this generation are running around with I-phones.

What's making them poor? They don't pay much for healthcare. They're better educated than previous generations.

Yes, but their iPhones are less than 1% of their GDP, so it's not real money. ;)

-Robert

Really; An Iphone is $300, not to mention another $300-600 in monthly fees.

If you're in your 20s and make 60k, you don't have a healthcare problem.


I missed your logic here.
 

Rustler

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2004
1,253
1
81
The illegals clog our emergency services here in AZ and it makes it is very expensive and the Feds don't pick up the Tab since it is their responsibility to control the borders which they don't do......................
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Really; An Iphone is $300, not to mention another $300-600 in monthly fees.

If you're in your 20s and make 60k, you don't have a healthcare problem.

Where are these poor people with Iphones? I have never seen one. Where are your cited facts?
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
I've been a card-carrying Democrat all of my life.

That said, if the Republicans ever return to being fiscally conservative (which they haven't been since Goldwater lost power in the 60s) then I'll be pleasantly delighted.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Rustler
The illegals clog our emergency services here in AZ and it makes it is very expensive and the Feds don't pick up the Tab since it is their responsibility to control the borders which they don't do......................

That is another separate problem in itself, but I agree that it is a problem and it does raise the prices.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
Originally posted by: Genx87
Why are people so scared of an Obama presidency?

Not scared of an Obama presidency, scared of an Obama presidency with a super majority.
Free to do whatever the hell they(dems) want.

Then I take it that you voted for Kerry in 2004, right? After all, you wouldn't want a super majority.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
Originally posted by: Rustler
The illegals clog our emergency services here in AZ and it makes it is very expensive and the Feds don't pick up the Tab since it is their responsibility to control the borders which they don't do......................

I remember a lot of people being outraged when a few of those hospitals shut down because of uninsured people using the emergency facilities. It's a consequence of how our healthcare system is currently set up, and clearly that needs to change.

However, this is not just the fault of the illegals; it is a result of ALL people without health insurance. The doctors are required to treat people who come into the emergency room, and since they lack insurance the hospital ends up picking up the bill. It doesn't matter if you're illegal or not; if you don't have health insurance and go to the emergency room for any reason, everyone else is picking up your tab.

Providing free preventative healthcare (not expensive procedures, basic stuff like checkups that don't cost anything) would go a long way toward ending the types of problems that have cropped up in AZ. If you invest minimally on preventative healthcare, then you won't have to pay out the ass for expensive surgeries and treatments later for all of those people who aren't paying into the system in the first place.

Either give everyone affordable health insurance or make the cheapest procedures free. These are the only two solutions to the problem of having uninsured people use the emergency facilities, since the time used verifying insurance information before treatment in an emergency situation may cost someone their life.