Housing prices are generally set up by the local job market. There's no evidence of wage increases or even meaningful employment increases. It seems like there's a lot of downward room for housing.
There should be, but there really isn't as much as you'd think because of negative equity. Historically, lots of Americans move every 5-7 years, often upward by using their equity to buy into a more desirable place, keep reasonable payments & stretch out the payoff date.
Negative equity shoots that in the ass. Hell, it kills moving downscale, too, when owners have to give up cash to get out from under. And, uhh, no cashout refi for you to pay off other bills, either, which was a big part of the frenetic housing activity during the "ownership society".
It's a weird sort of lockdown, complicated by enormous unsold inventory & pending foreclosures, not to mention banking goofiness. In 2006, they'd lend money to any warm body, and today they only want to lend to people who don't need a loan.
Depending on locale, prices may edge up slightly over the next few years, but I wouldn't depend on it...
Denver never soared to great heights during the flimflam of the Bush years, largely because we were hit particularly hard by the tech bust 10 years ago, so our situation is relatively stable, which isn't saying a helluva lot...