Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
So the hillbilly got beat by another hillbilly by 100 votes? stop the presses!!! :roll:
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
So the hillbilly got beat by another hillbilly by 100 votes? stop the presses!!! :roll:
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
You clearly are, but I am referencing his posting history.Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
someone's assuming...
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
![]()
Originally posted by: kylebisme
You clearly are, but I am referencing his posting history.Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
someone's assuming...
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
You are assuming still. I never suggested he has any problem with gay marriage, and never intended to imply anything of the sort.Originally posted by: jonks
The posting history where he said he has no problem with gay marriage?
Last I checked, there is no rule against calling a spade a spade.Originally posted by: cubby1223
We just recently had an elite member vacationed for far less than this.
Originally posted by: kylebisme
You are assuming still. I never suggested he has any problem with gay marriage, and never intended to imply anything of the sort.Originally posted by: jonks
The posting history where he said he has no problem with gay marriage?
A sad testament of just how things work here at ATPN.Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: kylebisme
There are many differences, not that one can expect a pea-brained bigot like yourself to acknowledge them.Originally posted by: OCguy
Your use of a demeaning/generalizing term to describe him makes you no different.
We just recently had an elite member vacationed for far less than this.
As to the content of this thread, everyone should be able to run for elected office. It's up to the people to choose who they want. If any of you don't approve of this such person, just chalk it up to "the system worked", and move on.
Originally posted by: jonks
Well the OP is mostly about gay marriage opponents, so forgive my misinterpreting your implication. When you call someone a bigot without substantiation except for a general reference to their history it begs interpreation. Please elaborate.
Rather. I've seen post of yours making bigoted assumptions, like this recent example:Originally posted by: OCguy
He probably saw a post of mine that was anti social-medicine...
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
If there wasn't a huge number of religious wackos in America, Israel would have been wiped off the planet a while ago. One of the biggest reasons why America stands up for Israel is because a huge portion of the electorate believe that Israel's existence is necessary before Jesus comes back.
How is that worse than your Islamic views? You are just as much or more whacko than any Xtian fundie.
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
People will be called Bigots.
Originally posted by: kylebisme
*snip*
Originally posted by: OCguy
I tried to ignore your initial out of line personal attack.
As I noted previously, I didn't expect you to understand. The final paragraph of my previous was simply to clarify my position to others who expressed confusion.Originally posted by: OCguy
That doesnt even make sense, sorry.
That isn't why I called you a bigot, it is why I called you pea-brained.Originally posted by: OCguy
Calling me a bigot because I point out that using disparaging generalizing slurs such as "hillbilly" is akin to the "I know you are, but what I'm I" response on the school yard.
No word is off limits, but many are rightly frowned upon in when used in various contexts.Originally posted by: OCguy
No, "Hillbilly," "Redneck," "White Trash," "hick" etc are not off limits nor frowned upon by society like their cousins for generalizing other races, but someday that is the way it will be.
It adds context, much like "homophobe evangelical" or "homophobe jock" would if either of those were the case at hand.Originally posted by: OCguy
Did throwing that in there add anything to this thread? Or was it just so we picture the caricature toothless white uneducated moonshine drinking "Yokel?"
As I explained above; I never suggested you have any problem with gay marriage, and never intended to imply anything of the sort.Originally posted by: OCguy
I get it. Because I didnt come out in my first post and attack the moron who was against gay marriage, I myself was against gay marriage by default.
I tried to ignore your initial out of line personal attack. However, after finding out that I indeed do support equal rights for gays, both in marriage and beyond, you probably should have stopped.
Originally posted by: kylebisme
As I noted previously, I didn't expect you to understand. The final paragraph of my previous was simply to clarify my position to others who expressed confusion.Originally posted by: OCguy
That doesnt even make sense, sorry.
That isn't why I called you a bigot, it is why I called you pea-brained.Originally posted by: OCguy
Calling me a bigot because I point out that using disparaging generalizing slurs such as "hillbilly" is akin to the "I know you are, but what I'm I" response on the school yard.
No word is off limits, but many are rightly frowned upon in when used in various contexts.Originally posted by: OCguy
No, "Hillbilly," "Redneck," "White Trash," "hick" etc are not off limits nor frowned upon by society like their cousins for generalizing other races, but someday that is the way it will be.
It adds context, much like "homophobe evangelical" or "homophobe jock" would if either of those were the case at hand.Originally posted by: OCguy
Did throwing that in there add anything to this thread? Or was it just so we picture the caricature toothless white uneducated moonshine drinking "Yokel?"
As I explained above; I never suggested you have any problem with gay marriage, and never intended to imply anything of the sort.Originally posted by: OCguy
I get it. Because I didnt come out in my first post and attack the moron who was against gay marriage, I myself was against gay marriage by default.
I tried to ignore your initial out of line personal attack. However, after finding out that I indeed do support equal rights for gays, both in marriage and beyond, you probably should have stopped.