I'm sure other factors were at play, but on the point about COVID in particular, we can't succumb to the logic that saving even one life is never a tradeoff for anything else of value. If we did, the speed limit would be 10 mph on the freeway, if we were even allowed to drive. Whether we like the idea of it or not, we make tradeoffs with safety versus other things every day. And that calculus will consider both the value of the other thing, and the number of people likely to be harmed. In the case of education, I would point out that it's even more crucial now than ever, with poorly educated Americans making extremely bad choices at the ballot box which could even end democracy. Not only that, we are eliminating unskilled labor with AI and robotics, and replacing it with high tech jobs, meaning it's an even bigger disadvantage these days to be without a good education than it was when we were young.
Not all of that is on COVID, of course. It's a broader conversation. But we should think very carefully about school closures should the situation arise in the future.
Yeah, that is true in general as well as with respect to COVID. It's very tricky, though, as not only are the trade-offs often very hard to see, and the effects hard to quantify, the costs and benefits of every such tradeoff tend to fall on different groups of people (that's certainly true when it comes to driving and speed-limits).
As far as school closures are concerned, I'm influenced by the facts that (a) the only person I personally know who nearly died from COVID (ended up seriously ill in hospital) was a teacher who caught it from their students, and (b) my own memories of school are that absolutely no learning occurred there anyway, you had to 'bunk off' in order to get sufficient peace-and-quiet to be able to get any studying done (I used to skip school to go to the library and work through the text books in peace).
For me school was just somewhere you were forced to go in order to be violently assaulted on a regular basis and end up in hospital occasionally (and I was lucky enough not to have been targeted by the two serious sexual abusers on the staff). Schools being closed back then would have been no great loss from my perspective.
But, on the other hand, it's clearly true that not every student has equal access to somewhere quiet to work and to adults who are willing and able to answer questions about things. And the one person I knew who was officially 'home schooled', while they didn't lose out academically, they definitely felt they did in terms of developing social skills. So I don't know, really. Making schools less crap would be the way to start.
I mean the point has been made repeatedly that poorer students suffered more from school closures because they had parents less able to academically help them, and less computer equipment and noisier, smaller homes, and more temptation to get into trouble and less motivation to study on their own, when compared to students from affluent middle-class backgrounds. But on the other hand, those students also tend to go to the crappiest schools, surrounded by the most disruptive fellow students and with the worst teachers - so don't the two factors cancel out somewhat?
Last edited: