Healthcare bill debate passed

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
"Altmire said he must have the approval of his bishop in Pittsburgh before he can vote yes."

/facepalm
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I think Wreckem shows his own failed assumptions with the following: "Also I have to note the following, because you are wrong on a point. Big Business supports this bill, small business does not. If this bill passes small business will be farked up the ass because of the mandate they HAVE to provide health coverage. In this economy, where many small businesses are closing left and right(even some Big Biz's), small business cannot cover that mandate."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not surprising at all that big business supports the bill, because they want to offer health insurance but cannpt if they are forced to opt out. Small business has never offered to support our existing employer based health care system by offering it, and the only way to keep the existing employers based system working is to expand and not reduce those employers willing to offer employees health care insurance.

As more and more big businesses opt out, the basis of our employers based system is already on the verge of collapse. And we have to face the facts, in an interim health care system, small business will have to also have to step up to the plate or big business can't let small business to have a totally free ride.

Worse yet, our private insurance companies have more money stick to their hands as costs rise, and can only reduce costs by rationing care. With preexisting conditions a very egregious abuse.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
All the Democrats will do is throw those members districts a new bridge to get the votes.

Again, where in the constitution does it authorize congress the power to create a government run health care system?

There isn't a prohibition against it. What the government cannot do is say "we are assuming control and private insurance may not participate. I believe the Dems know this and so are going to create a situation that will leave them the only option. The railway barrons did this and it worked. Certainly its a fraud but they can say that technically there is an option. All you have to do is operate at a perpetual loss.
 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
All the Democrats will do is throw those members districts a new bridge to get the votes.

Again, where in the constitution does it authorize congress the power to create a government run health care system?

Where does the Constitution give the authority to form an airforce? It explicitly says army and navy. There is no mention of the airforce, ergo, the airforce is unconstitutional and should be dismantled entirely.

Just taking this ridiculous argument to it's logical extreme.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Where does the Constitution give the authority to form an airforce? It explicitly says army and navy. There is no mention of the airforce, ergo, the airforce is unconstitutional and should be dismantled entirely.

Just taking this ridiculous argument to it's logical extreme.

What a nice slippery slope you've created.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Wow, I decided to catch a glimpse of the house debate on C-SPAN, what an absolute joke. There is *no* debate taking place, they're just running a dog and pony show to get their last round of sound-bytes in for the television cameras...

Paraphrased -
"Vote for our bill for the same reasons I stated five months ago"
-"Vote against the bill for the same reasons I stated five months ago"


If anyone believes the Democrat's bill will not add a cent to the deficit... I don't know, this is sad...
 
Last edited:

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Worse yet, our private insurance companies have more money stick to their hands as costs rise, and can only reduce costs by rationing care. With preexisting conditions a very egregious abuse.

Anyone who believes the government will not ration care is an idiot. I still am at a loss at how the Democrat's plan *reduces* costs, they're primarily shuffling around who pays the bills and in what percentage. Anyone know what logic comes from taxing medical supply makers? You can't pay for something by taxing it... Makes no sense... Except for it temporarily appeases the "I hate all corporations" segment of the public.
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
You guys should tune in to C-Span, the crazies are coming out in force. C-span.org has a live stream.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
looks like they're voting on the bill now (with the anti-abortion amendment passed, it seems like)


edit: 218 yea votes, consider it passed.
 
Last edited:

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
1 republican voted yes... I guess Obama can call this a mark of his promise to bring bipartisanship back to washington.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
220 total in favor! Great job. Joseph Gal (sp) grew a backbone and voted with his heart and mind. Good job to that guy.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
1 republican voted yes... I guess Obama can call this a mark of his promise to bring bipartisanship back to washington.

He voted after the bill already had the votes, he was *not* going to be the one to tip the scales. So no, it was not a bi-partisan agreement in the least. The Democrats will still claim it is, though...
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
odds on the bill still having something to do with health care by the time it gets through the senate?
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
I would have been surprised if it hadn't passed with the huge majority the Dems have and the arm twisting going on. Next step is the Senate which will be tougher.
 

bl4ckfl4g

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2007
3,669
0
0
1 republican voted yes... I guess Obama can call this a mark of his promise to bring bipartisanship back to washington.

I think it is the dude that replaced Jefferson. His only chance to get re-elected is to vote for the bill. He cast the vote after they already got to 218.
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
The Senate battle will be interesting, to say the least, and then it is time to merge the two.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
lol @ wikipedia


"Joseph Cao has no family. He was born of Satan and lost a soul the day he voted against republicans."