Thebobo
Lifer
- Jun 19, 2006
- 18,574
- 7,672
- 136
Location: Vancouver, Canada
You have no dog in this fight.
Well he was referring to the war on a Iraq Bush dragged Canada into it as well.
Last edited:
Location: Vancouver, Canada
You have no dog in this fight.
How many times did Bush threaten to bypass congress?
This is not "just" about EOs, this is about a failed leader who is grasping at straws.
obama thinks he has the authority to bypass congress with EOs, which is going to come back and bite him in the ass.
No president should be acting this way. Whats next, is he going to throw himself on the floor and have a tantrum?
Well he was referring to the war on a Iraq Bush dragged Canada into it as well.
Wait, wait! You want us to ignore the EO's bush signed based on the circumstances bush faced but you ignore the circumstances under which Obama has used EO's?
You are one dumb mother fucker or it looks like all those chemicals you've inhaled your whole adult life from your job are finally starting to take their affect on you. I suspect you don't have much time left and you create threads to distract you from your reality. Which would be fine but then you should let people know so that they don't take you too seriously and you end up with a legacy of being one dumb ass mother f-er![]()
Well he was referring to the war on a Iraq Bush dragged Canada into it as well.
You have not answered a single question.
Did Bush threaten to bypass congress if he did not get what he wanted?
Do you have anything to contribute besides insults?
Nobody seemed to be objecting at the time.
Its only in retrospect that people seem to have a problem.
It only took 7 post for someone to mention President Bush.
This thread is about obama. But for some reason people keep bringing up Bush.
Location: Vancouver, Canada
You have no dog in this fight.
Well he was referring to the war on a Iraq Bush dragged Canada into it as well.
Wrong.
I did not mean literally "nobody", it was a figure of speech.
And as I said before you have no dog in this fight.
I'm just glad we aren't in another war (Syria, Iran and whatever other place people have been salivating to get into,..).
Politics wise, the dude made some blunders (healthcare is still a mess and worse frankly). Not the greatest president/leader, but certainly not the worst.
Would you call bombing a country an act of war?
Would you call bombing a country an act of war?
I would say yes. He should have been much more tougher and more hands on. His biggest mistake was trying to be the nice guy, trying to reach out to Republicans.
Obama should have ruled with more of an Iron fist and taken a hard line against the Republican party from day one. My way or the highway attitude, and pushed the Democrats hard to get things going.
This is a strange idea. Obama has had one of the most successful foreign policy tenures of any recent president; the only more successful one I can think of is GHWB. It's especially strange when you look at how much more successful he has been than the supposed foreign policy 'experts' from the previous administration.
There's a reason why the foreign policy community thinks so highly of him.
Sounds like how we wound up with Obamacare as written and without all its huge amount of flaws being addressed during bipartisan compromise.
I did not mean literally "nobody", it was a figure of speech.
And as I said before you have no dog in this fight.
Even as a "figure of speech" it's still wrong in the context that you used it.
And again, my location has what to do with discussing American politics in a forum that is open to people from around the world?
And again, my location has what to do with discussing American politics in a forum that is open to people from around the world?And as I said before you have no dog in this fight.
What Texashiker said is far more likely true than not.
(1) do you have a pet dog?
if yes, (2) did your pet dog perform as a service dog in the middle east during the fighting?
I didn't think so.
Sorry but you have no dog in this fight.