• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Has Donald Trump opened up his son to public scrutiny?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
fskimospy said:
I’m telling you your solution makes you more likely to lose.

So if you want to do that, have fun losing.
Click to expand...
He feels like a loser so the unconscious hidden death wish tha goes along with self hate will mean he creates what he fears. He thinks he’s on to a good idea but you just told him he’s insane. He is.
 
If he commences on a political career in his own right he's as 'fair game' as anyone else, no? But seems seriously premature at the moment when he's just an involuntary prop for Donald.

In any case, for some reason, my mental image of him is of a small child - still getting over the shock of hearing he's almost old enough to vote.
 
fskimospy said:
Do you want to feel validated emotionally or do you want to win? Pick one.
Click to expand...
We disagree upon responses. You appear to want to repeat 2016. I feel that has been done & it failed. The game has changed Democrats need to learn the new rules.
Just so there is no confusion if an under 18 year old continually is used to troll & shit talk you must respond.
 
I just tried to have Bing AI to write a joke about barron and debate. It said it was time to move on and it was inappropriate to write jokes about a child or political figures.

Our AI overlords have spoken. 😀
 
Fanatical Meat said:
We disagree upon responses. You appear to want to repeat 2016. I feel that has been done & it failed. The game has changed Democrats need to learn the new rules.
Just so there is no confusion if an under 18 year old continually is used to troll & shit talk you must respond.
Click to expand...
So tell me how attacking a child helps.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
We’ve been over this, I will not allow myself to be shit upon. That won’t happen.
Voters don’t like weak people who allow themselves to be bullied. Nobody likes the schmoe.
Click to expand...

I'm the first to call out the Dems for being too weak in rhetoric and fighting back against the evil that is the GQP, but attacking family like a child who has not injected themselves into politics is absolutely not the way you act stronger. Dems should never stoop that low. However, they do need to hit back harder and with more plain language. But dude, Barron? That's just a bad look, is also simply wrong, and going to backfire anyway.
 
MrSquished said:
I'm the first to call out the Dems for being too weak in rhetoric and fighting back against the evil that is the GQP, but attacking family like a child who has not injected themselves into politics is absolutely not the way you act stronger. Dems should never stoop that low. However, they do need to hit back harder and with more plain language. But dude, Barron? That's just a bad look, is also simply wrong, and going to backfire any
Click to expand...
He’s 17, he is not an infant. He could easily say please don’t use my image and in the above scenario(s) we are assuming he is a willing participant.
Fuck that. He deserves shit in this case, he is a willing participant or a useful idiot. Either the case he’d deserve it.
 
Last edited:
Fanatical Meat said:
We disagree upon responses. You appear to want to repeat 2016. I feel that has been done & it failed. The game has changed Democrats need to learn the new rules.
Just so there is no confusion if an under 18 year old continually is used to troll & shit talk you must respond.
Click to expand...
Like typical of people who rationalize, you set up a false dichotomy where it's your way or something absurd you've made up. It's always amusing to see people say nobody is going to shit on me when the reason is there were shit on long ago and internalized it and now shit on themselves.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
He’s 17, he is not an infant. He could easily say please don’t use my image and in the above scenario(s) we are assuming he is a willing participant.
Fuck that. He deserves shit in this case, he is a willing participant or a useful idiot. Either the case he’d deserve it.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah I’m sure if he said ‘please don’t do that’ Trump would totally agree because as shown for the entire rest of Trump’s life he respects those requests.

Do you even hear yourself?
 
fskimospy said:
Who cares? I care about winning, not if my personal dignity is offended.

You need to grow up and realize that your personal pride is not the most important thing. Winning is.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Why does every single discussion with you go in a circle that NEVER ends. I have given you the chance to end this but you continue. Just stop you are not required to get the last word in every time. We don’t agree just end it. Give me shit I will give you shit.
 
fskimospy said:
Oh yeah I’m sure if he said ‘please don’t do that’ Trump would totally agree because as shown for the entire rest of Trump’s life he respects those requests.

Do you even hear yourself?
Click to expand...
Then Trump defeats the purpose of using him. Pretty simple stuff here. If the guy willing and poses for this shit he bears responsibility.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
Exactly. Why does every single discussion with you go in a circle that NEVER ends. I have given you the chance to end this but you continue. Just stop you are not required to get the last word in every time. We don’t agree just end it. Give me shit I will give you shit.
Click to expand...
This is very funny to me. Most discussions with me that never end come from someone doing exactly what you’re doing.

‘I think we should attack children as an effective campaign strategy and if anyone disagrees it’s their fault’

Do you realize how crazy you sound?
 
fskimospy said:
This is very funny to me. Most discussions with me that never end come from someone doing exactly what you’re doing.

‘I think we should attack children as an effective campaign strategy and if anyone disagrees it’s their fault’

Do you realize how crazy you sound?
Click to expand...
There you go, gotta have that last word don’t you?
Can’t just simply agree to disagree. You know how childish that is right?

I’ll wait for your reply that absolutely will happen
 
Fanatical Meat said:
There you go, gotta have that last word don’t you?
Can’t just simply agree to disagree. You know how childish that is right?
Click to expand...
I think your opinion is stupid and insane. You are asking me to agree to disagree, and I decline.

I want to be clear, your opinion is both insane and stupid. Whenever you reiterate it I will remind you that it’s insane and stupid.

I personally think ‘they are mean so I must attack a child’ is a childish position to hold but I’m not sure you’re in a place to accept that.
 
fskimospy said:
This is very funny to me. Most discussions with me that never end come from someone doing exactly what you’re doing.

‘I think we should attack children as an effective campaign strategy and if anyone disagrees it’s their fault’

Do you realize how crazy you sound?
Click to expand...
I think if the former President uses his 17 year old son again as an attack instrument he (Brannon) is fair game. If he doesn’t want shit he shouldn’t be part of the trolling. Very simple. We don’t think the same. I am having trouble why someone can’t understand this and wants to increase to scope to encompass all children.

BYW you still cannot let the matter rest.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
I think if the former President uses his 17 year old son again as an attack instrument he (Brannon) is fair game. If he doesn’t want shit he shouldn’t be part of the trolling. Very simple. We don’t think the same. I am having trouble why someone can’t understand this and wants to increase to scope to encompass all children.

BYW you still cannot let the matter rest.
Click to expand...
What should Barron Trump do to prevent this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top