Has Donald Trump opened up his son to public scrutiny?

[HomerJS]

Trump posted this photoshopped picture of his son with the caption indicating his son will debate Joe Biden. Has Trump now opened up his son to public scrutiny/attack? Considering what the likes of MTG did to David Hogg and how the Republicans openly criticized Obamas girls while he was in office it would seem fair to me. While I wouldn't do it Trump has put his son in play.

Barron Trump, 17, Used by Father in New Anti-Biden Post on Social Media: All Bets are Off Now on What's Exempt in Political Coverage

click here for all of today's Showbiz411 headlines For years we've heard that Donald Trump's teen son, Barron, was off limits to the press. But now Donald himself has thrown Barorn, 17, into themix with this post on his TruthSocial media page. "In an effort to level the playing field," the picture

www.showbiz411.com

 

[Pens1566]

Yes. He opened the door, now he gets to deal with what comes in.


Besides, the "right" has never treated kids as off limits. There was some pretty heinous shit said about Chelsea Clinton (and the Obama girls) back in the day.

 

[eelw]

Nah still a minor

 

[tweaker2]

The rules of the game the Republicans play by is worlds apart from those the Democrats play by, whereby their politicians can say anything and do anything against the libs yet they will scream bloody murder if the Democrats dare criticize any conservative of some petty thing like jaywalking on 5th Ave. while cheering Trump on if he murdered someone on the same street.

In fact as Trump has proven, the more brazen and malicious their politicians behave the better they like it. Yet should any Democrat dare cross a pinky toe over that very same line it becomes a matter of national security and disgrace.

In the MAGA bubble, they can do no wrong while everyone else is always wrong when speaking out against them. It's just their way of excusing and ignoring their treachery, their cheating hearts, their insurrection, their gerrymandering, their attempted coup and every other act of malevolence that resulted in having so many of their corrupted officials indicted and convicted of crimes against The People of the nation. In their echo chamber all of those numerous acts of treason and criminality never happened or is excusable for some inane reason or another because they were conditioned to believe the Democrats are somehow infinitely worse.

 

[HomerJS]

Yes. He opened the door, now he gets to deal with what comes in.


Besides, the "right" has never treated kids as off limits. There was some pretty heinous shit said about Chelsea Clinton (and the Obama girls) back in the day.

I forgot about Chelsea Clinton. Rush Limbaugh went on the air and said she looked like the family dog. Chelsea was 12 at the time.

 

[nOOky]

I like to tell my GQP relatives that Barron is the anchor baby of a Yugoslavian mail order bride brought here by Trump so she could get her family chain migration citizenship so they can all go to the malls and spend money. Gets 'em every time.

 

[fskimospy]

My questions would be:
1) do we HAVE to be as shitty as the Republicans?

2) what do you think would be gained by attacking Trump’s teenage son?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

I’m giving Melanoma 24 hours to get the former President in line and if she doesn’t he is fair game.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

My questions would be:
1) do we HAVE to be as shitty as the Republicans?

2) what do you think would be gained by attacking Trump’s teenage son?

1) Yes we do

2) Winning

 

[fskimospy]

1) Yes we do

2) Winning

Can you help me understand what group of voters who do not currently support Biden would be convinced to support him by attacks on a 17 year old?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Can you help me understand what group of voters who do not currently support Biden would be convinced to support him by attacks on a 17 year old?

All that is required to understand is “When they go low we go high”
Worked out really good didn’t it.
When the go low we go lower just to make going low unthinkable is a winning strategy

 

[fskimospy]

All that is required to understand is “When they go low we go high”
Worked out really good didn’t it.
When the go low we go lower just to make going low unthinkable is a winning strategy

So to be clear you think Hillary Clinton would have won had she attacked Barron Trump? This seems... highly unlikely.

Have you considered that one of the reasons Trump is so unpopular and has had such a long string of defeats is that voters don't like it when you do things like attack children?

 

[fskimospy]

People frequently confuse what makes them feel good emotionally with good campaign strategy. I know it would turn me off if someone did that - I am certain I'm not alone.

I'm going to say attacking someone's underage kids falls squarely within the 'feels good, dumb idea' category. What will immediately happen after that is that the right will find every fainting couch in the western hemisphere to faint over and then Trump and Republicans will have reporters falling all over themselves to prove how fair minded they are by condemning Democrats for their uncouth ways.

Remember when someone politely asked Sarah Huckabee Sanders to leave their restaurant and we had an extended national discussion on civility in politics? And that was complete bullshit! Imagine what conservatives would do if they actually had a point.

 

[HomerJS]

So to be clear you think Hillary Clinton would have won had she attacked Barron Trump? This seems... highly unlikely.

Have you considered that one of the reasons Trump is so unpopular and has had such a long string of defeats is that voters don't like it when you do things like attack children?

Biden has gone high yet his approval is lower than Trump. I can't explain it. I'm not saying Dems should attack Barron directly, but it seems reasonable the rules for press have now been changed when it comes to Barron also taking into account Republicans history in attacking kids.

 

[Stokely]

No, he's just a raging asshole. I don't give two shits about his kids unless and until they get involved in politics. He does happen to be good at what passes for a "debate" these days. He who lies, interrupts and insults best wins and Trump is a master at all those.

As far as approval levels...we are a society of ignorant conspiracy junkies addicted to social media so I wouldn't look for logic in those. Maybe being as gross a human as you can be will win elections, I have no idea. Certainly being a xenophobic bigot appeals to a ton of people, perhaps the Democrat candidates could try that as well.

 

[Moonbeam]

All that is required to understand is “When they go low we go high”
Worked out really good didn’t it.
When the go low we go lower just to make going low unthinkable is a winning strategy

It's always fun to watch authoritarians screaming 'unfair'. "It's just not fair that the Nazis have all the fun. Where's my share? I'm full of hurt too and need to dump on someone. Why not the bad guys? it's only fair if nobody can tell the difference between me and them."

God save us from mirrors.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

So to be clear you think Hillary Clinton would have won had she attacked Barron Trump? This seems... highly unlikely.

Have you considered that one of the reasons Trump is so unpopular and has had such a long string of defeats is that voters don't like it when you do things like attack children?

Hillary lost because she was the Schmoe, she would never fight back. Nobody likes the shy loser who allows others to pick on them.

 

[UNCjigga]

He’s just a proud dad—his boy totally rocked at the last debate team meet and next week he’ll nuke Iran at model UN!

 

[thilanliyan]

So to be clear you think Hillary Clinton would have won had she attacked Barron Trump? This seems... highly unlikely.

Have you considered that one of the reasons Trump is so unpopular and has had such a long string of defeats is that voters don't like it when you do things like attack children?

GOP voters seem to support their politicians more when people are attacked for a variety of reasons, for example Trump attacking Mexicans, disabled people, women, etc, so clearly some voters are good with it and actually want it.
Now, specifically on attacking children, maybe not.

 

[HomerJS]

Any Dems if asked about this picture response should be, "That's fine. At least he'll be more coherent than his father and likely better behaved."

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Any Dems if asked about this picture response should be, "That's fine. At least he'll be more coherent than his father and likely better behaved."

What coherent?

You obviously are making some assumptions

 

[Pens1566]

Any Dems if asked about this picture response should be, "That's fine. At least he'll be more coherent than his father and likely better behaved."

DNC retort: "Well, at least both participants will be free and clear of felony indictments!"

 

[fskimospy]

Hillary lost because she was the Schmoe, she would never fight back. Nobody likes the shy loser who allows others to pick on them.

So in this context it is your belief that voters will like Biden more if he attacks underage children.

In my opinion this is insane and obviously wrong.

 

[fskimospy]

DNC retort: "Well, at least both participants will be free and clear of felony indictments!"

See - this is a far better idea. You don't attack Barron because attacking kids is gross and will undermine Biden's support.

Something of this sort though indirectly 'praises' Barron while turning it back on Trump.

 

[HomerJS]

So in this context it is your belief that voters will like Biden more if he attacks underage children.

In my opinion this is insane and obviously wrong.

If Biden uses my or @Pens1566 response it will be attacking Trump with son as a foil. It would be a humorous clever attack. It will also show the Dem base Biden is willing to hit back. People do like fighters and Dems fall short on that front.

Follow-up question, why did the likes of Rush Limbaugh get more popular when he attacked an underage child?