Has Donald Trump opened up his son to public scrutiny?

[Fanatical Meat]

I’m proceeding from a point of view that I wouldn’t attack a minor child without a pretty airtight case that he was guilty of something worthy of being attacked.

I’ve seen nothing that says the kid has had any say in this matter. I also have his fathers behavior where anyone and anything is fair game to be used for his betterment unless they have something over him.

Using his son to score political points fits firmly in Trumps behavior and he dangles his own kid like a red flag in front of a bill as a target for his political rivals to attack which he can spin to keep his base bound to him.

I see no reason to attack Baron for his father’s behavior and even if he was out on Fox bad mouthing Dems I probably still wouldn’t attack him - at least until he’s an adult in his 20’s.

It seems to me you feel if there’s even the slightest chance he’s on board then he’s fair game.

Without going super deep, Brandon gets a pass for yesterday and he likely will get additional passes. What I am saying if he’s in deep he is in the game and he becomes fair game.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

To play devils advocate, how do you know he didn’t ?

edit finished the thread and the goal posts moved a bit

Why does he have to make a public request to not use his image to his father to not be “fair game”, why wouldn’t a private request be enough?

Just to answer the edit part, that’s tricky and I don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. What I am saying if his images is continually and used to troll he needs to say “Stop” if his family and or handlers refuse he needs to say “Stop” in an undeniable public manner. He’s a Man now he is not a child. He needs to understand accountability.
Continually means just that his image is frequently used to troll or he poses for photos used to troll and so on. As before I am not counting the basement dwelling trolls who photoshop however they could be counted if it becomes excessive.
Sort of like that Porn vs Art definition. I know Porn when I see it.

 

[fskimospy]

Just to answer the edit part, that’s tricky and I don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. What I am saying if his images is continually and used to troll he needs to say “Stop” if his family and or handlers refuse he needs to say “Stop” in an undeniable public manner. He’s a Man now he is not a child. He needs to understand accountability.
Continually means just that his image is frequently used to troll or he poses for photos used to troll and so on. As before I am not counting the basement dwelling trolls who photoshop however they could be counted if it becomes excessive.
Sort of like that Porn vs Art definition. I know Porn when I see it.

Why should he be held accountable for other people's actions?

Why would he have an affirmative obligation to publicly break with his family in order to avoid attacks?

Accountability means being held accountable for things you do, not things other people do.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Why should he be held accountable for other people's actions?

Why would he have an affirmative obligation to publicly break with his family in order to avoid attacks?

Accountability means being held accountable for things you do, not things other people do.

I know you say shit about Jr and his moron brother. Why is Bannon a sacred cow? Why isn’t Hunter a sacred cow?
Understand this is assuming he becomes a regular trolling participant. It is NOT right now.

 

[fskimospy]

I know you say shit about Jr and his moron brother. Why is Bannon a sacred cow? Why isn’t Hunter a sacred cow?
Understand this is assuming he becomes a regular trolling participant. It is NOT right now.

Don Jr. and Eric are active political participants. I'm not aware of a single public statement Barron has ever made about anything, much less anything political.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Don Jr. and Eric are active political participants. I'm not aware of a single public statement Barron has ever made about anything, much less anything political.

And that’s what I mean at some point posting his image makes him a political entity.
I’ll know that point when I see it.

 

[fskimospy]

And that’s what I mean at some point posting his image makes him a political entity.
I’ll know that point when I see it.

Only if Barron himself posts it. He is not responsible for other people’s actions.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Only if Barron himself posts it. He is not responsible for other people’s actions.

I’ll know it when I see it.
Could be next post it could be years it could be never.
I’ll know it when I see it and I will feel no shame.

 

[GodisanAtheist]

I mean, I guess there are other ways to get your post count up besides neffing, as @Fanatical Meat is demonstrating here...

 

[darkswordsman17]

Hillary lost because she was the Schmoe, she would never fight back. Nobody likes the shy loser who allows others to pick on them.

This is nonsense both ways. Hilary did fight back and got roundly criticized for it. Not only do people actually like the shy losers that get picked on its like the origin story for half our superheroes.

 

[darkswordsman17]

If Biden uses my or @Pens1566 response it will be attacking Trump with son as a foil. It would be a humorous clever attack. It will also show the Dem base Biden is willing to hit back. People do like fighters and Dems fall short on that front.

Follow-up question, why did the likes of Rush Limbaugh get more popular when he attacked an underage child?

For starters, I wouldn't assume that Barron hasn't committed crimes. I'd wager he probably has at the behest of his family even. Not saying he maliciously did so, but with that family I wouldn't assume that anyone other than maybe an infant didn't commit a crime because it seems to be integral to that family.

Why do Dems get criticized when they fight back? Often by Dems. Explain that. There's plenty of Dem "fighters" they just don't fight in your stupid pointless fucked up manner of fighting that doesn't accomplish anything for them.

Because Republicans and right wingers are fucking psychos. Don't become psychos yourself.

Seriously, dude, you're fucked in the head if you're legit arguing that the Dems should even acknowledge this nonsense let alone go after Barron at all. The only possible retort should be calling Turmp a groomer.

 

[darkswordsman17]

The right can dish it out, but they can't take it.

The problem is its not Barron dishing it out. Its his worthless dipshit dad. So call Turmp a groomer and don't even bring up Barron at all.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

This is nonsense both ways. Hilary did fight back and got roundly criticized for it. Not only do people actually like the shy losers that get picked on its like the origin story for half our superheroes.

And the super hero is no longer a shy loser. Get it?
She failed at fighting back this is a point nearly everyone understands. She was too aloof and played by the old rules.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Alright so it’s okay to go after Baron in 4 years right?
Boys the other side gives zero fucks. When will you all learn this.

 

[fskimospy]

Alright so it’s okay to go after Baron in 4 years right?
Boys the other side gives zero fucks. When will you all learn this.

Nope! Still not ok!

I'm not sure why you're so determined to sabotage Democrats by pointless and juvenile attacks on children. This is a big reason why Trump lost!