• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Guns Are Number 1!

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,177
9,167
136
AKM uses the russian x39 though.
Sure, but lots of people are absolutely terrified of the rifle patterns themselves - AR and AK rifle patterns can put various calibers through them depending on the chamber. The AR-10 can fire a .308, and an AR-22 can fire a .22. Depending on the AK, it might be 7.62x39, or 5.45x39, or 7.62/51(.308), 556/.223, etc.

The way people will latch onto the AR part of the rifle as if the pattern matters, rather than the velocity of the bullet, or more importantly, the mindset/mental illness of the shooter.

The AR part of an AR-15 is basically just the modular nature of the base gun that allows someone to heavily modify the gun itself without much effort or time.

It's like a Honda or Toyota, where the ubiquitous frame and large aftermarket for parts and kits allows someone to really customize their car.

Having an AR lower and a few different uppers in different chambers allows someone to hotswap out an upper/barrel to fire multiple calibers out of the same "gun". That's why the AR is so popular. Not because it is somehow some special breed of killing machine, but because you can pick one up, pick up a few different parts, and watch a Youtube video to customize it with basic tools.

Ask Ukrainians if having access to AK rifles is a net positive or net negative. Then take a look at where this country is heading over the next few decades and tell me we need to round up everyone's AR so Republicans can murder liberals politely, in their sleep, like they're waiting to do right now - not hyperbole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitek

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Nothing bad about a homicide when it's justifiable. Just look at recent cases when someone used a gun in self defense.

looks like somebody doesn't understand what homicide means.

I mean, I'm also certain that your interpretation of "justifiable" is a very broad, very long stroke.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,750
6,764
126
Don't forget that you can shoot a 308 out of an AR or AKM pattern rifle, which makes it even more terrifying!
California tries to ban scary looking guns. We are limited to self defense at 10 round magazines which means that that criminals will be able to bring 100 round drums to kill you. I am sure the state would love to ban anything but musket loaders. and even those if they could. Nobody should own anything that scares you, right?

The way I see it is that so long we as a society can't tell the difference between who is a responsible person and who is not no rights of self defense should be extended to anybody insuring that only the irresponsible and non law abiding will have the only guns. Fear creates entitlement, the right to ban what is of no danger in responsible hands. Fuck the responsible, I'm scared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nickqt

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,750
6,764
126
AKM uses the russian x39 though.
Yup, you don't want to shoot it out of a 30 caliber gun that isn't for Russian rounds. You can buy American made Russian rifles even one that is California legal but I am not a fan of featureless. I am studying how what parts to buy for my AR15 full feature build while remaining legal. That requires a max ten round fixed magazine that can legally be changed quickly. Personally, I hope the SC rules that California law unconstitutional. No matter what fire rate I could achieve I have no intention or desire to shoot anybody. Such an act would be the height of immorality and violate all norms on which one can ever have any self respect.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,177
9,167
136
Yup, you don't want to shoot it out of a 30 caliber gun that isn't for Russian rounds. You can buy American made Russian rifles even one that is California legal but I am not a fan of featureless. I am studying how what parts to buy for my AR15 full feature build while remaining legal. That requires a max ten round fixed magazine that can legally be changed quickly. Personally, I hope the SC rules that California law unconstitutional. No matter what fire rate I could achieve I have no intention or desire to shoot anybody. Such an act would be the height of immorality and violate all norms on which one can ever have any self respect.
Stay away from most American-made AKs. There are plenty of good options that won't blow up in your face. WASR, Zastava, Arsenal, or parts kits. Maybe KUSA.

For the AR-15, there are plenty of groups that exist that can give you CA-compliant parts lists/options, and some of them are even expressly liberal/left-wing. You can also look up any SRA groups that might be near you.
 

Pohemi

Lifer
Oct 2, 2004
10,884
16,971
146
I hear personal pique. Good grief. The only question that you asked me that I consciously avoided was my age that I experienced an insight that transformed my view of the world.
You identified the question I was referring to, but I only wondered how long ago, not at what age. I suppose they aren't too different of a question if someone knew your approximate age, so I'm not sure if that matters for willingness to divulge the info. I was only curious.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,750
6,764
126
You identified the question I was referring to, but I only wondered how long ago, not at what age. I suppose they aren't too different of a question if someone knew your approximate age, so I'm not sure if that matters for willingness to divulge the info. I was only curious.
The whole issue for me regards a wish not to be boxed and labeled. I will try to explain why. I had a friend who lived in a house in Half Moon Bay who had gotten involved with a group of people who had moved from NYC, a psychotherapist and his patients. The details I do not know, but this man gave a teaching lecture to this group in his yard and I happened to attend. He said things there that I felt could only be said by a person who was much deeper and wiser than me. He told me that I would be curious about him to categorize and label him as a part of my intention to keep from expressing to him my real feelings. He told me that my curiosity whole have a motivation behind it.

I have been exposed to other purportedly enlightened people who claim the same thing. Mulla Nasrudin painted a parrot brown trimmed its nails and beak and set it free, saying to it as he did so, now you look more like a bird. Where he was from there weren’t any parrots it seems.

Fresh tea will not pour in a full cup.

Since he died I have seen this phenomenon over and over again. He said there is no such thing as this kind of question, that there is an unconscious motivation. I stole his pen when I signed a check and he confronted me later about it but I am still in disbelief. He said it was an expression of my hidden need of wanting something from him, but my truth is that the pen I borrowed from him just happened to be the exact same kind that I had and not had with me. It was an innocent mistake and I stopped taking things when I got caught doing so by my Mom at age 5 give or take. I hate thieves. Must be a curse. My grand father it seems, on her side, was apparently a horse thief.

Anyway, it is profoundly personally insulting to be told that your innocent curiosity is other than you are aware of and that there are people who will help you see who you are by actively telling you why they avoid your questions.

It is much harder to box people up, label them and put them into categories previously dismissed as having value if you don’t have any personal data about them to work with. This is also how lots of psychoanalysts operate. It is a principle they use in transference.

Suppose a young man has deep wisdom and tells me he can help me to see in a way that will free me from ignorance and my real aim is not to see better but become better at being sick, another thing I was told I wanted to do despite protests to the contrary. I will simply write him off as too young to know anything. If he is old he knows nothing or a Trump supporter. I know now from posting here how everything that is wrong with the world is the fault of the Boomers. God help us all if I turn out to be one of them.

You know better than most I have too big an ego for that. I have told myself all my life I am hundreds of years ahead of my time. My truth is timeless. You can beat your chest or polish you nails on your vest after blowing on them.

So I think I was 21 or 22 and that was a good while back.

If you are single you can off nothing in the was of wisdom th the married about relationships and if married nothing to the single.

If you are white you don’t understand racism. If you are liberal you are un-American.

This need to categorize is the sickness. But when we do it we do so without recognition. Self understanding is hard on the ego. To discover the ‘possible’ truth that what we hate is what we were told is who we were when we were exposed to hate as children is not a pleasant idea. But it is a fucking relief to be told, or it was for me, I was only trapped by feeling the lies I was taught were facts and not attachment to false beliefs.
 
Last edited:
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
Sure, but lots of people are absolutely terrified of the rifle patterns themselves - AR and AK rifle patterns can put various calibers through them depending on the chamber. The AR-10 can fire a .308, and an AR-22 can fire a .22. Depending on the AK, it might be 7.62x39, or 5.45x39, or 7.62/51(.308), 556/.223, etc.

The way people will latch onto the AR part of the rifle as if the pattern matters, rather than the velocity of the bullet, or more importantly, the mindset/mental illness of the shooter.

The AR part of an AR-15 is basically just the modular nature of the base gun that allows someone to heavily modify the gun itself without much effort or time.

It's like a Honda or Toyota, where the ubiquitous frame and large aftermarket for parts and kits allows someone to really customize their car.

Having an AR lower and a few different uppers in different chambers allows someone to hotswap out an upper/barrel to fire multiple calibers out of the same "gun". That's why the AR is so popular. Not because it is somehow some special breed of killing machine, but because you can pick one up, pick up a few different parts, and watch a Youtube video to customize it with basic tools.

Ask Ukrainians if having access to AK rifles is a net positive or net negative. Then take a look at where this country is heading over the next few decades and tell me we need to round up everyone's AR so Republicans can murder liberals politely, in their sleep, like they're waiting to do right now - not hyperbole.

You're ignoring that the AR got that way because it was first marketed as a weapon of war, a legal version of the M-16/military rifles. Then the latter came later after it was popular because at that point there was a market to support such.

You're straight up full of shit that people are ignoring mindest. I and others always bring up the gun fetishism and bullshit gun nut arguments at basically every shooting that gets discussed here as its almost always relevant. That is entertwined with all the rest. The toxic masculinity, the bullshit lies and calls for violence by right wingers because they believe everything as a war to shoot their way out of it. Its all the same mindset. In fact, I'd argue the gun nuttery came first and empowered the rest after the chickenshits got their surrogate penises to stroke and be able to make good on their threats. That's what enabled the resurgence of white nationalism in the US. There's shitloads of dudes that just liked to shoot that then got brainwashed/indoctrinated by white supremacists. I also basically don't know conspiracy theorists that didn't get there until after they bought a gun, although there are some. But there's a clear connection with American gun worship and loss of logic.

FYI, I fucking know what you and your ilk are doing with your "Democrats arm yourselves!" shit. Its the same shit white nationalists did to right wingers. And if you think your outcome is going to be any better you're delusional. And that's if you're not actually completely full of shit and looking to turncoat once right wingers get their way. Which is what many of you mother fuckers will do. To save your own ass you'll join the fascists. And then you'll pat yourselves on the back that you had no choice. Nevermind you enabled them at every turn while also intentionally stirring up resistance to give them an enemy to legitimize their insanity. If you actually gave a shit you'd tell people to become police and military. Not play soldier by stroking your metal dick replacement.

Er, you know Ukrainians overthrew their Russian puppet government without guns, right? Like do you even know how full of shit your own argument is? Just like that nonsensical "USSR wouldn't invade the US because there's too many guns!" nonsense, whilst you ignore the litany of actual reasons. Your ARs aren't going to do jack shit if right wingers get control of the government and/or military.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,177
9,167
136
You're ignoring that the AR got that way because it was first marketed as a weapon of war, a legal version of the M-16/military rifles. Then the latter came later after it was popular because at that point there was a market to support such.

You're straight up full of shit that people are ignoring mindest. I and others always bring up the gun fetishism and bullshit gun nut arguments at basically every shooting that gets discussed here as its almost always relevant. That is entertwined with all the rest. The toxic masculinity, the bullshit lies and calls for violence by right wingers because they believe everything as a war to shoot their way out of it. Its all the same mindset. In fact, I'd argue the gun nuttery came first and empowered the rest after the chickenshits got their surrogate penises to stroke and be able to make good on their threats. That's what enabled the resurgence of white nationalism in the US. There's shitloads of dudes that just liked to shoot that then got brainwashed/indoctrinated by white supremacists. I also basically don't know conspiracy theorists that didn't get there until after they bought a gun, although there are some. But there's a clear connection with American gun worship and loss of logic.

FYI, I fucking know what you and your ilk are doing with your "Democrats arm yourselves!" shit. Its the same shit white nationalists did to right wingers. And if you think your outcome is going to be any better you're delusional. And that's if you're not actually completely full of shit and looking to turncoat once right wingers get their way. Which is what many of you mother fuckers will do. To save your own ass you'll join the fascists. And then you'll pat yourselves on the back that you had no choice. Nevermind you enabled them at every turn while also intentionally stirring up resistance to give them an enemy to legitimize their insanity. If you actually gave a shit you'd tell people to become police and military. Not play soldier by stroking your metal dick replacement.

Er, you know Ukrainians overthrew their Russian puppet government without guns, right? Like do you even know how full of shit your own argument is? Just like that nonsensical "USSR wouldn't invade the US because there's too many guns!" nonsense, whilst you ignore the litany of actual reasons. Your ARs aren't going to do jack shit if right wingers get control of the government and/or military.
I've told you this before and I'll tell you again.

You're a massive fucking douchebag and I don't give one fuck about anything you think.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: repoman0

Pohemi

Lifer
Oct 2, 2004
10,884
16,971
146
You're ignoring that the AR got that way because it was first marketed as a weapon of war, a legal version of the M-16/military rifles. Then the latter came later after it was popular because at that point there was a market to support such.

You're straight up full of shit that people are ignoring mindest. I and others always bring up the gun fetishism and bullshit gun nut arguments at basically every shooting that gets discussed here as its almost always relevant. That is entertwined with all the rest. The toxic masculinity, the bullshit lies and calls for violence by right wingers because they believe everything as a war to shoot their way out of it. Its all the same mindset. In fact, I'd argue the gun nuttery came first and empowered the rest after the chickenshits got their surrogate penises to stroke and be able to make good on their threats. That's what enabled the resurgence of white nationalism in the US. There's shitloads of dudes that just liked to shoot that then got brainwashed/indoctrinated by white supremacists. I also basically don't know conspiracy theorists that didn't get there until after they bought a gun, although there are some. But there's a clear connection with American gun worship and loss of logic.

FYI, I fucking know what you and your ilk are doing with your "Democrats arm yourselves!" shit. Its the same shit white nationalists did to right wingers. And if you think your outcome is going to be any better you're delusional. And that's if you're not actually completely full of shit and looking to turncoat once right wingers get their way. Which is what many of you mother fuckers will do. To save your own ass you'll join the fascists. And then you'll pat yourselves on the back that you had no choice. Nevermind you enabled them at every turn while also intentionally stirring up resistance to give them an enemy to legitimize their insanity. If you actually gave a shit you'd tell people to become police and military. Not play soldier by stroking your metal dick replacement.

Er, you know Ukrainians overthrew their Russian puppet government without guns, right? Like do you even know how full of shit your own argument is? Just like that nonsensical "USSR wouldn't invade the US because there's too many guns!" nonsense, whilst you ignore the litany of actual reasons. Your ARs aren't going to do jack shit if right wingers get control of the government and/or military.
LOL. What in the fuck?

You're off the rails with this one. Settle down, Francis.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,040
136
If you actually gave a shit you'd tell people to become police and military. Not play soldier by stroking your metal dick replacement.

Why do you think that would be any better? I heard this call on the radio not long ago (the woman sounded entirely credible, and also rather posh)


The Independent Office for Police Conduct reported a shocking culture of racism and misogyny within the Metropolitan police following a series of investigations into conduct within the force.

"Anne" phoned in to tells LBC that the institutional issues within police forces nationwide, as she shared the story of her son's deterioration after joining a force outside London.

She told Shelagh Fogarty that he had began displaying deeply misogynistic behaviours after joining the police, addressing women in offensive terms and bragging about the fact "he had sectioned women."

"He would call women every name under the sun."

She said his change in attitude "worked its way into other sorts of things", telling Shelagh that her son "made three separate jokes about people who had taken their own lives" in her presence.

"He sounds like he's been radicalised somewhere" Shelagh said, pushing "Anna" to find the root of her son's personality shift.

"This happened after he joined the police" she insisted, telling Shelagh that she is "not talking to him" and "won't talk to him again" due to his attitude towards others.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,750
6,764
126

Damn. Couldn't find the other multi-multi-shooting thread so I dropped it here.
I saw that in the news. However, when I saw it my mind didn't go to how bad guns are but to this being just another typical example of self hate. Man falls in love marries his dream, they have kids and suddenly it's over. The wife has found a new source of attention, their relationship washed up on the rocks of mutual recriminations that the other can't fill the vacuum within and the man, with his ego demolished, seeks to punish his family as the external face of his hidden feelings of worthlessness.

His gun was just an extension of his own self hatred that he was taught as a child. Fix society of that disease and you won't have to worry about guns. Most of us are already not so damaged that we detach so totally from reality and empathy for others.

Remember, if you hate yourself and do not know it, always treat the symptoms in others of that very disease. Never see that you too are infected. Surprise! Allowing the truth in hurts because the truth is we hurt. Denial is how we make sure we never heal.

And even without the denial it ain't easy but it helps with the mind games we play that we are perfectly innocent and it's all about those nasty 'others'. If only he hadn't killed himself, we could have made him suffer for what he did, just like his parents once did. Thew motto of the insane is that more insanity is the cure for it.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
As a rational thinker my suggestion for reducing gun violence would be to include a suicide tablet with every gun sale. Frankly, however, if you really want to reduce the number of armed people in the US the practice should be encouraged.

Great something else I have to pay for every time I buy a gun. I’ll throw them in the pile along with all the gun locks I have never used.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,750
6,764
126
Great something else I have to pay for every time I buy a gun. I’ll throw them in the pile along with all the gun locks I have never used.
I think the point was that we live in a culture where people kill themselves because they feel their lives are useless and the cure we fools offer who don't want to understand those feelings within ourselves or do anything real about the culture itself will seek instead to look for useless answers like preventing people, not from wanting to kill themselves psychologically, but not being able to kill themselves physucally, and particularly with guns. It is just such a simple minded and obvious way to rationalize away the real issue and point a finger at a hated (by some) device that is a convenient stand-in for out projected fears. I suggested a similarly absurd form of reasoning to solve suicide by guns.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,650
15,844
146
While Tesla works on self-driving cars, Smith & Wesson is developing a self-targeting, self-shooting gun. It'll be the safest ever!

/s
Tracking Point did it 10 years ago.
1e4e6c0b-56cc-4c44-abe3-5cb524c952cd.png
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Pohemi

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,650
15,844
146
A well-armed militia was comprised of citizens, seperate from the government/military. The idea was that state militias could/would stand up to a tyrannical federal government. Just nitpicking the one detail there, but your point was understood. :thumbsup:
Well not just a tyrannical government. Somebody had to be able to put down a slave revolt otherwise you’d end up with Haiti and that was something the south definitely didn’t want when the bill of rights was signed off in late 1791.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,307
12,876
136
Gotta die of something. It will most likely be heart disease for me despite the magnitude of guns that I own.
You are but one data point in the statistical distribution. And the statistics say the likelihood of dying from your own gun is greater than likelihood of you defending yourself with it.

You can choose to accept that risk, but the statistics are quite clear.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
You are but one data point in the statistical distribution. And the statistics say the likelihood of dying from your own gun is greater than likelihood of you defending yourself with it.

You can choose to accept that risk, but the statistics are quite clear.

So do I give up something I enjoy doing with my friends and my son because something may or may not happen to me at some point in the future? Fuck that.

Statistically speaking none of my guns will probably ever be used to kill anyone.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,388
136
So do I give up something I enjoy doing with my friends and my son because something may or may not happen to me at some point in the future? Fuck that.

Statistically speaking none of my guns will probably ever be used to kill anyone.
If you acknowledge owning a gun makes you less safe but you have it for recreational purposes that’s a perfectly logical position to have but from a societal perspective I don’t think recreation is important enough to keep guns legal.
 

dlerious

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2004
2,122
934
136
You are but one data point in the statistical distribution. And the statistics say the likelihood of dying from your own gun is greater than likelihood of you defending yourself with it.

You can choose to accept that risk, but the statistics are quite clear.
Is that a real statistic or a made up one?