Pohemi420:
Facetiousness is contempt. I would know, as I use it regularly.
M: I am on an IPad and find it hard to format so I’m doing it in my lazy old way. I don’t know what the above comment about facetiousness is supposed to mean.
P: See, this is a big part of what bothers me about your rhetoric. In your mind, nobody else has had this experience that is unique only to yourself. No one else understands themselves or anything because they haven't had this experience. And yet, you say that you found this state of being, and lost it again at some point. Do you not think it possible that anyone else has?
M: I said I am not alone:
https://www.poehm.com/en/list-of-enlightened-people/. Thanks, because exploring and looking for something to link to here was fun. I did a search on 'A list of people who are enlightened'
M: My experience ended suffering. It did not leave me in a permanent state of unity with the universe as it does for some.
P: What if I told you that I myself had a period of peace, tranquility, universal consciousness, and love? A connection to humanity and possibly the Cosmos. Would you believe me? Does it matter? No. I'm not running around condescending to anyone who might not have experienced such a state.
M: Why wouldn’t I believe you? But you know the rules. Never suggest you have something or others will come to take it from you. They will also accuse you of being an egotist and a braggart. Always keep your head down in poverty or they will say you are greedy. Always practice self-deprecation or you could get whacked like a mole. I know these rules. But since I seem to be less interested in what others think of me and more interested in pointing out there is a self imposed prison we are in we can be free of, and knowing so from personal experience, I would rather face you charges of egotistic condescension than keep silent about that possibility.
Perhaps you don't really believe that you experienced such a state or it later let you down. I have no idea but not wanting it for others is not something I understand.
P: You assume a lot, and seemingly don't realize or acknowledge that you are doing so (though it's exactly what I've been trying to point out to you).
M: That’s not the question. The question is that if you have experienced such a state, why on earth aren’t you working so others can have one too. Are you worried about breaking the known rules I spoke of above? You are trying to point out something to me I am not concerned about. I know I know things by knowing I know nothing and I know they are good to know so honest expression takes a higher priority.
Your assertion that my conviction that altered states of conscious that are transformative and experienced inwardly as blessings, for ease of expression, are expressed by me as declarations of some ego needing someone to feel superior to are absurd. I am already profoundly aware that my inner state today is infinitely superior to what it once was has been thorougly achieved. I am a winner. I won. I have the golden ring. How could me convincing some slub like you of my superiority possibly have any worth when the love you get is equal to the love you give?[/QUOTE]