I think we are well aware of Moore's camera tricks... That... and Heston is 147 years old.Originally posted by: DeeKnow
NRA? LOL ... that would be an unbiased party on this debate, i spose...Originally posted by: edro13
I think your opinion would change if you read a few of the stories in the NRA magazine. Every month, they have a section with ~5-10 stories about home/self defense.
I recently saw Heston on "columbine' ... i think he disgraced himself rather sadly on that film... NRA should be declared an illegal organization
Originally posted by: DeeKnow
Originally posted by: edro13
I think your opinion would change if you read a few of the stories in the NRA magazine. Every month, they have a section with ~5-10 stories about home/self defense.
NRA? LOL ... that would be an unbiased party on this debate, i spose...
I recently saw Heston on "columbine' ... i think he disgraced himself rather sadly on that film... NRA should be declared an illegal organization
Originally posted by: DeeKnow
Originally posted by: edro13
I think your opinion would change if you read a few of the stories in the NRA magazine. Every month, they have a section with ~5-10 stories about home/self defense.
NRA? LOL ... that would be an unbiased party on this debate, i spose...
I recently saw Heston on "columbine' ... i think he disgraced himself rather sadly on that film... NRA should be declared an illegal organization
Originally posted by: edro13
I think we are well aware of Moore's camera tricks... That... and Heston is 147 years old.Originally posted by: DeeKnow
NRA? LOL ... that would be an unbiased party on this debate, i spose...Originally posted by: edro13
I think your opinion would change if you read a few of the stories in the NRA magazine. Every month, they have a section with ~5-10 stories about home/self defense.
I recently saw Heston on "columbine' ... i think he disgraced himself rather sadly on that film... NRA should be declared an illegal organization
Originally posted by: cucumber
Originally posted by: Softballslug
Originally posted by: cucumber
Originally posted by: Xenon14
Scenerio A: Guns are LEGAL. Criminals (people that break the law) and average Citizens (people that abide by the law) have guns.
Scenerio B: Guns are ILLEGAL. Criminals still have guns (they break the law). Average Citizens don't (they abide by the law).
Result: Outlawing guns only removes guns from law-abiding citizens and promotes an environmnet that is conducive to criminal activity by placing more power in the hands of the criminals.
absolutely.
When guns are OUTLAWED only the OUTLAWS will have them............
Why is that so hard to understand?
Cuc,
I was completely agreeing with you!
I'm not sure if you're reffering to me or people in general, but just in case, I completely agree. I wasn't being sarcastic.
Originally posted by: TheAudit
Thanks for reminding me, I've been meaning to pick up some ammo to use at the range.
Michael Moore? LOL! That would be a source of unbiased information on this debate, i spose...Originally posted by: DeeKnow
NRA? LOL ... that would be an unbiased party on this debate, i spose...Originally posted by: edro13
I think your opinion would change if you read a few of the stories in the NRA magazine. Every month, they have a section with ~5-10 stories about home/self defense.
I recently saw Heston on "columbine' ... i think he disgraced himself rather sadly on that film... NRA should be declared an illegal organization
Originally posted by: Mookow
He thinks Bowling For Columbine was a documentary. What more do you need to know about his capacity for reasoning?And what is your reasoning behind the statement "NRA should be declared an illegal organization"?
Originally posted by: compudog
My wife was recently being stalked by some internet lunatic so we got a nice pump action shotgun, some tactical loads, and practiced and practiced some more. Home defense. I also shoot trap and skeet as a hobby/sport for fun. I don't believe in carrying a pistol, though I do have one. I just don't carry.
Originally posted by: compudog
Well, my wife let some facts slip about some of her hobbies, used the Internet to seach for phone numbers in public directory, narrowed down a location, then started calling. Yes we filed police reports, made copies of messages that were left etc. Final straw was "maybe I'll pay you and your husband a visit..." All from pissing this guy off playing online backgammon...
Originally posted by: compudog
Yes. The guy is within driving distance (found out through police trace.) I travel frequently on business and she felt that she needed something she could handle for protection while I am away. I am not happy about it, but we constantly practice, she feels comfortable with it. If it never gets used I'll be happy.
Originally posted by: compudog
All from pissing this guy off playing online backgammon...
Originally posted by: Hardcore
And complete banning of guns won't happen over night, or in a couple of years, or even 10 years. It might take 20, maybe even 50 years for it to be out of the system significantly. So maybe England and Austrlia is on the right path, but it's just too early to tell. I'll like to believe in 20 years when a signficant portion of the guns get out of the system, that these types of crime will diminish greatly. Maybe this is like a broken leg, to set it straight, it's going to take some pain and suffering, but in the long run it'll help the leg heal straighter.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: compudog
All from pissing this guy off playing online backgammon...
That excuse worked?