Gov. Schwarzenegger Declares State of Emergency Due to Budget Impasse

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: DealMonkey

Ask and ye shall receive, redneck.

Wow, that was REALLY mature of you. .


So you call the guy a name, he calls you one back, then suddenly you turn into the bastion of all things mature?

/smack upside the head

He insulted people in the central valley first. I believe the label "elitist" is appropriate in this case and I don't consider that as an insult.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: DealMonkey

Ask and ye shall receive, redneck.

Wow, that was REALLY mature of you. Fact of the matter is that the likes of you liberals have been ruining the great state of CA for the past 2 decades, driving businesses and talent out of the state. CA is hell for the middle class because of failed socialist policies leading to high taxation. Some of my friends I went to school with in CA in engineering are moving out after being laid off.

I'm no fan of the Republicans after them doing such a wonderful job before your Messiah took over. Though by the time your Messiah leaves office the nation will probably follow CA's footsteps, drowning in debt due to idiotic policies by spreading the wealth of hard working Americans from liberal elites like Nancy Pelosi who have never earned a living from hard work.

As mature as you, with your lame 'elitist' crap.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: marincounty
Originally posted by: Mursilis
I just want to thank California for serving as a cautionary tale for the rest of the 49. We do enjoy watching you all wallow in your self-created disaster. What's that German word for that?

I believe the word is Schwarzenegger.

He is Austrian :p
lol.

btw. The official language of Austria is German. ;)
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: marincounty
Originally posted by: Mursilis
I just want to thank California for serving as a cautionary tale for the rest of the 49. We do enjoy watching you all wallow in your self-created disaster. What's that German word for that?

I believe the word is Schwarzenegger.

He is Austrian :p

Oh, that's right, they speak Austrian, not German. Thanks for your correction as helpful as always.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: marincounty
Originally posted by: Mursilis
I just want to thank California for serving as a cautionary tale for the rest of the 49. We do enjoy watching you all wallow in your self-created disaster. What's that German word for that?

I believe the word is Schwarzenegger.

Well done.

Tell that to your public union buddies especially the prison guards, cops who made bank (some over 100k, on CA taxpayers' dime) on OT. If it weren't for the Democratic party kowtowing to unions in CA we would be in much better shape.

Oh well, you're the one who believes that gerrymandering is good for the state of CA because it's good for your national Democratic party.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: DealMonkey

As mature as you, with your lame 'elitist' crap.

You are an elitist by calling people who don't have the same values as you as "rednecks".
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: marincounty
Originally posted by: Mursilis
I just want to thank California for serving as a cautionary tale for the rest of the 49. We do enjoy watching you all wallow in your self-created disaster. What's that German word for that?

I believe the word is Schwarzenegger.

Well done.

Tell that to your public union buddies especially the prison guards, cops who made bank (some over 100k, on CA taxpayers' dime) on OT. If it weren't for the Democratic party kowtowing to unions in CA we would be in much better shape.

Oh well, you're the one who believes that gerrymandering is good for the state of CA because it's good for your national Democratic party.

Do you ever spout anything but Republican talking-points? Union bad. Grunt. :roll:
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dyna
CA needs to claim imminent domain on some of their beach front land and since there not using their parks they can sell them both to TX to raise funds.

I'd support war in that case. We'd win.

By 'we' I hope you mean California. We have lockheed, marine bases aplenty, coastguard, etc etc.

I assumed it was common knowledge I'm a Californian.:) Don't forget our gangs and Hollywood.

Any Texans who actually got here would just throw down their guns and beg to stay, if they had any sense. Er, nevermind that last point, probably wouldn't be anyone like that.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234

Oh, that's right, they speak Austrian, not German. Thanks for your correction as helpful as always.

Most Austrians speak with a heavy accent. I speak German and I think I know a little bit more about the language than you do.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234

I assumed it was common knowledge I'm a Californian.:) Don't forget our gangs and Hollywood.

Any Texans who actually got here would just throw down their guns and beg to stay, if they had any sense. Er, nevermind that last point, probably wouldn't be anyone like that.

People from other states hate California because of attitudes like yours.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: DealMonkey

Do you ever spout anything but Republican talking-points? Union bad. Grunt. :roll:

Put up or shut up:

http://www.sacbee.com/editorials/story/1305330.html

If California lawmakers needed one more reason not to give pay raises to the state's 31,000 prison guards, a newly released salary survey should provide it. In the state's first survey that compares correctional officer pay rates in California with the pay rates of their counterparts around the country, California prison guards came out on top by huge margins.

California's correctional officers earn a maximum base salary of $73,728. According to the newly released survey, that's 39 percent more than the average base pay for prison guards in 10 other states and the federal government. When benefits including retirement and medical insurance are included, California's guards earn 29 percent more than the median earned by guards in the other states and the federal government.

The survey understates the disproportionate pay of California prison guards because it does not include overtime. Prison guards in California take home $16,000 in overtime on average every year. In 2006, 1,423 guards collected more than $50,000 in overtime; 36 earned more than $100,000.

Given those pay rates, it's hardly surprising that 130,000 people apply to become California prison guards every year.

At a time California is struggling to pay its bills, the guards union is demanding more pay raises. They have threatened to recall the governor if they don't get what they want. It's time for lawmakers to stand up to the guards. They deserve to be well paid, and they already are. This study should settle that.


Tell me these union fvcks aren't overpaid.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: marincounty
Originally posted by: Mursilis
I just want to thank California for serving as a cautionary tale for the rest of the 49. We do enjoy watching you all wallow in your self-created disaster. What's that German word for that?

I believe the word is Schwarzenegger.

Well done.

Tell that to your public union buddies especially the prison guards, cops who made bank (some over 100k, on CA taxpayers' dime) on OT. If it weren't for the Democratic party kowtowing to unions in CA we would be in much better shape.

Oh well, you're the one who believes that gerrymandering is good for the state of CA because it's good for your national Democratic party.

Do you ever spout anything but Republican talking-points? Union bad. Grunt. :roll:

I agree with you generally about him, but this may actually be the first time there's some vaiditiy his point. The CA Democratic party has had too close of ties to the prison guard union and it's not always been fair to taxpayers, and while I can't say I know of a clear partisan backing for police union overtime, I do think there has been some poor management there that has added to costs.

But even assuming the worst on that, there's a political reality of theRepublicans having far worse policies and being such whores as to make the Dems look like nuns, and so while I won't excuse the abuses, I will point out that the solution needed is larger than only the issues for Democrats, that it's not a solution only to fix their issues and then leave them powerless against Republican corruption for Republicans to gain control and ruin the state.

He has a good memory on my position on gerrymandering, but not surprisingly he misrepresented it in a way that makes it look worse, by not mentioning that I was saying I'm opposed to *only* the Democratic states ending gerrymandering and giving more seats to Republicans, while Republican states continue to gerrymander, thereby giving a big edge to Republicans in Congress - I want any 'fix' to be more universal.

However, my state voted the other way, and CA did adopt a system to end the legislature creating districts, so we can expect just what I described as far as CA.

He also neglected to mention that I strongly support states adopt ranked voting, allowing voters to vote for who they' really want' and still have their cotes count.
 

HannibalX

Diamond Member
May 12, 2000
9,359
2
0
Originally posted by: paperfist
How can the government let CA go broke while spending billions a month in Iraq?

Take a civics class and then try posting again.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234

Oh, that's right, they speak Austrian, not German. Thanks for your correction as helpful as always.

Most Austrians speak with a heavy accent. I speak German and I think I know a little bit more about the language than you do.

But not enoug, apparently, not to 'correct' a good joke about the German word being 'Schwarzeneggar' by the irrelvant comment that he's Austrian.

But maybe you can translate my well-justified criticism of your post into German, since you speak it. Or perhaps into Austrian.

Speaking German is realy not a relevant card for you to play on this point. If we were discussing something that requires speaking German, you might have a point.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234

I assumed it was common knowledge I'm a Californian.:) Don't forget our gangs and Hollywood.

Any Texans who actually got here would just throw down their guns and beg to stay, if they had any sense. Er, nevermind that last point, probably wouldn't be anyone like that.

People from other states hate California because of attitudes like yours.

Well, people from around the world have increasingly hated Americans for attitudes like yours, so I guess that's worse.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234

He has a good memory on my position on gerrymandering, but not surprisingly he misrepresented it in a way that makes it look worse, by not mentioning that I was saying I'm opposed to *only* the Democratic states ending gerrymandering and giving more seats to Republicans, while Republican states continue to gerrymander, thereby giving a big edge to Republicans in Congress - I want any 'fix' to be more universal.

Either way you're still wrong. I did not misrepresent your position at all. You did not want CA to have district boundaries reasonably drawn because it would weaken the national democratic party. I don't care about partisan politics. I'm registered with neither party. When I was a CA resident there is only one thing I cared: that our districts are drawn in a way that our people are adequately represented, on a local, state and federal level. It's the power hungry CA democrats who have drawn out districts to their benefit. What other states do is their business and I don't care.

You could say that Tom DeLay gerrymandered districts to further Republican causes. I assure you, if a politician did this in my district and I have the privilege to vote against him/her, I will.
 

SunSamurai

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2005
3,914
0
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: DealMonkey

As mature as you, with your lame 'elitist' crap.

You are an elitist by calling people who don't have the same values as you as "rednecks".

Maybe youre a redneck for having such shitty values?


See? Your retarded logic goes both ways.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234

Well, people from around the world have increasingly hated Americans for attitudes like yours, so I guess that's worse.

Since when should I or any American care about what foreigners think of our domestic politics?

I despise politicians and political parties in power. It just happens that your party is in power right now, nothing personal. You're also one of those kinds that foolishly believe that if your party (Democrats) had complete control of the Government for eternity, we'll have utopia. This is the same as Republicans thinking that they'll control everything forever during the first 6 years of Bush's presidency. They failed, and you will too.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234

He has a good memory on my position on gerrymandering, but not surprisingly he misrepresented it in a way that makes it look worse, by not mentioning that I was saying I'm opposed to *only* the Democratic states ending gerrymandering and giving more seats to Republicans, while Republican states continue to gerrymander, thereby giving a big edge to Republicans in Congress - I want any 'fix' to be more universal.

Either way you're still wrong. I did not misrepresent your position at all. You did not want CA to have district boundaries reasonably drawn because it would weaken the national democratic party. I don't care about partisan politics. I'm registered with neither party. When I was a CA resident there is only one thing I cared: that our districts are drawn in a way that our people are adequately represented, on a local, state and federal level. It's the power hungry CA democrats who have drawn out districts to their benefit. What other states do is their business and I don't care.

You could say that Tom DeLay gerrymandered districts to further Republican causes. I assure you, if a politician did this in my district and I have the privilege to vote against him/her, I will.

No, I'm not wrong, and you did misrepresent my position (and you try again in your post a couple down where you tell me what I think about permanent Democratic control).

Let's use an analogy of Obama's cancer curing initiative. Now, suppose the proposal was "but the cure will only be made available to black cancer victims."

Well, you might oppose THAT program. You insist that any government program to cure cancer has to provide the cure regardless of race.

If I then simply posted that your position was to oppose curing cancer, that's a lot like your only saying I'm against fixing gerrymandering in CA.

I'm actually in favor of ending gerrymandering on a national basis, just not handing power to the immoral party and only reducing the power of one of the two main parties.

The only question is whether you can understand how you are misrepresenting my position, not whether you are.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234

But maybe you can translate my well-justified criticism of your post into German, since you speak it. Or perhaps into Austrian.

Deine Kritik ist mir Scheissegal, deshalb habe ich keine Lust deine sinnlose Meinung zu übersetzen :)
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234

No, I'm not wrong

blah blah blah


I'm actually in favor of ending gerrymandering on a national basis, just not handing power to the immoral party and only reducing the power of one of the two main parties.

Two wrongs don't make a right. If you see something wrong in another state's redistricting procedure, why don't you fight it? People fought against the Democratic establishment in CA and can finally (eventually) be able to vote for representatives in districts that accurately represent demographics.

Arguing with you about adequate representation of our citizens for a healthy democracy is a waste of my time, since you're so fixated on your quest for democratic control. Plus it's off-topic anyway.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,996
1,745
126
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: spacejamz
sooner or later, providing all of those health services and education to those who were not paying into system was bound to catch up...that might not be the main cause of this, but fixing that should be a pretty big chunk of the problem...

Nice to see the exact same programs that Obama wants to implement on a national level are working out so well for the golden state.

Obama 's program will work though, even Walmart has approved it, that must mean it is the right thing to do. You know walmart, the friendly family oriented, we care about people employer !

last time I checked, Walmart isn't the red...can't say the same about CA though...
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Craig234

But maybe you can translate my well-justified criticism of your post into German, since you speak it. Or perhaps into Austrian.

Deine Kritik ist mir Scheissegal, deshalb habe ich keine Lust deine sinnlose Meinung zu übersetzen :)

Scheiße innen, Scheiße heraus.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Do you ever spout anything but Republican talking-points? Union bad. Grunt. :roll:
Put up or shut up:

http://www.sacbee.com/editorials/story/1305330.html

California's correctional officers earn a maximum base salary of $73,728. According to the newly released survey, that's 39 percent more than the average base pay for prison guards in 10 other states and the federal government. When benefits including retirement and medical insurance are included, California's guards earn 29 percent more than the median earned by guards in the other states and the federal government.

Tell me these union fvcks aren't overpaid.
Why is the article comparing the maximum base salary pay to the average/median base pay of prison guards of other states?

Also, the California prison system is horribly overcrowded, if you haven't heard already: link

The California prison system must reduce overcrowding by as many as 55,000 inmates within three years to provide a constitutional level of medical and mental health care, a federal three-judge panel tentatively ruled Monday.

Relying on expert testimony, the court ruled that the California prison system, the nation?s largest with more than 150,000 inmates, could reduce its population by shortening sentences, diverting nonviolent felons to county programs, giving inmates good behavior credits toward early release, and reforming parole, which they said would have no adverse impact on public safety. The panel said that without such a plan, conditions would continue to deteriorate and inmates might regularly die of suicide or lack of proper care.