I doubt they like short traders.
Who does they most assholes. I’m glad the short sellers are getting their clocks cleaned. I just hope the non-yolo folks caught up in the frenzy get out with a profit.
I doubt they like short traders.
They like short traders quite a lot. Short traders keep the market fluid and usually minimize spikes/dips.I doubt they like short traders.
It's all fun until someone loses an eye.Well, it'll be fun to watch GME tomorrow...
I think your A and Bs are identical.They like short traders quite a lot. Short traders keep the market fluid and usually minimize spikes/dips.
Please tell me the difference between these two hypothetical traders:
A) Buys low on Jan 18, sells high on Jan 19, buys low on Jan 20, sells high on Jan 21, buys low on Jan 22.
B) Buys low on Jan 18, sells high on Jan 19, buys low on Jan 20, sells high on Jan 21, buys low on Jan 22.
Hint: One people call evil assholes and one people seem to love.
No, no, no. All of the trades in one row was evil. All of the trades in the other row was perfectly fine.I think your A and Bs are identical.
Shorting in itself isn't evil, it is necessary for market liquidity. However, what these companies did appears to be either unethical or maybe illegal.
It's all fun until someone loses an eye.
How is betting on a business's failure economically good? You (general you) are actively encouraging the collapse of a business.No, no, no. All of the trades in one row was evil. All of the trades in the other row was perfectly fine.
The difference is that one of the two started Jan 15 with a sell. Thus every trade on that list is a short trade. Even though they are the exact same trades as the other person. We assign evilness to one set and angelic qualities to the other, for the exact same effect on the market.
There are illegal and unethical things going on in the stock market all the time. Shorting can go into that territory. But, in general, shorting is a good thing as long as everyone plays by the same set of rules.
The anger is right though. We have two sets of rules. Hedge funds have a different but overlapping set of rules compared to regular investors. Fraud is illegal in both. If fraud has occurred, it should stop and should be punished. The anger towards shorting is usually misguided. Unless there is fraud, the goal of short trade is basically identical to a regular trade: buy low and sell high. The short just started that buy/sell pattern with a sell instead of starting the buy/sell pattern with a buy.
None of the buys or sells affect the business in any way, shape, or form, unless the business was going to try and short itself by issuing new shares. None of this gives or takes away a penny in profit from the business.How is betting on a business's failure economically good? You (general you) are actively encouraging the collapse of a business.
None of the buys or sells affect the business in any way, shape, or form, unless the business was going to try and short itself by issuing new shares. None of this gives or takes away a penny in profit from the business.
You can short without thinking the company is going to go bankrupt. You can short any time you think there company is overvalued or when you think some event will push it down.How is betting on a business's failure economically good? You (general you) are actively encouraging the collapse of a business.
So if I understand what happened today.
- Hedge funds need to buy GameStop stock (apparently more than is on the open market) to close out their shorts
- Reddit users and others have been buying it up driving up the price (especially as shorts close and they have to buy more stocks)
- Today several brokerages like Robinhood prevented small time buyers from buying more stock but would allow them to sell
- Hedge funds were able to purchase or sell as normal
So basically the small guy brokerages decided to help the hedge funds at the expense of their own customers.
Is that legal?
It was even worse. Robinhood sold clients' shares without their permission. Basically patted the clients on the head and said, "this is for your own good." Today was Fantasy Island for lawyers.So if I understand what happened today.
- Hedge funds need to buy GameStop stock (apparently more than is on the open market) to close out their shorts
- Reddit users and others have been buying it up driving up the price (especially as shorts close and they have to buy more stocks)
- Today several brokerages like Robinhood prevented small time buyers from buying more stock but would allow them to sell
- Hedge funds were able to purchase or sell as normal
So basically the small guy brokerages decided to help the hedge funds at the expense of their own customers.
Is that legal?
Is there proof of that they were actually seeing them? I saw a few images posted, but haven't seen a legit news story about it.It was even worse. Robinhood sold clients' shares without their permission. Basically patted the clients on the head and said, "this is for your own good." Today was Fantasy Island for lawyers.
It also sounds like some of the clearing houses for stock transactions were starting to demand safe guards to protect themselves (eg, broker having to have more cash reserves). Though, the way that RH and a few other brokerage firms handled that seems off, to say the least.I certainly do not want to defend hedge funds doing naked shorts, and Robinhood's decision is definitely questionable. But at the time, every stock trade needs a buyer and a seller, and this was reaching tulip bulb levels of liquidity stupidity.