Discussion Game Stop Stock Short Squeeze

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136

Citadel is not paying Robinhood to execute trades for no reason. I am sure it's structured in a legal way, but the effect is the same, they skim off those free trades and pay Robinhood for the privilege. So when Citadel, which is the source of RH's revenue is short and RH's users who don't pay commissions are long a stock, RH is going to serve its actual paying customer.
If citadel is trading based on its knowledge of yet to be executed customer order information that is not public then they are committing a crime, and there are no exceptions.

Pay for order flow is actually a fairly common thing, but not so people can front run orders.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
If citadel is trading based on its knowledge of yet to be executed customer order information that is not public then they are committing a crime, and there are no exceptions.

Pay for order flow is actually a fairly common thing, but not so people can front run orders.

I am sure they structure it legally, but effect is they are skimming money of Robinhood users, and paying Robinhood for it. They wouldn't pay for order flow if there wasn't an arbitrage opportunity for them in it at the expense of the Robinhood users.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136
I am sure they structure it legally, but effect is they are skimming money of Robinhood users, and paying Robinhood for it. They wouldn't pay for order flow if there wasn't an arbitrage opportunity for them in it at the expense of the Robinhood users.
All I’m saying is if they are doing that their entire business model is criminal. There is no legal way to use non-public knowledge of incoming orders from your customers to jump in front and skim money.

What you’re referring to is payment for order flow.
 

conehead433

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2002
5,569
901
126
It's sad to see the brokerage firms acting in collusion to stop the trading of a particular stock to help protect the hedge funds from basically losing everything they have because they were stupid. And trying to get the government to intervene because there is market manipulation going on. That's what market makers do all the time, and it's fun to watch something like this. So if buying/selling is restricted that leaves the hedge funds free reign to sit and trade shares among each other at continually lower bids to drive the price down. If the SEC gets involved I only want to see one outcome - the Hedge funds have to cover their position.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
It's sad to see the brokerage firms acting in collusion to stop the trading of a particular stock to help protect the hedge funds from basically losing everything they have because they were stupid. And trying to get the government to intervene because there is market manipulation going on. That's what market makers do all the time, and it's fun to watch something like this. So if buying/selling is restricted that leaves the hedge funds free reign to sit and trade shares among each other at continually lower bids to drive the price down. If the SEC gets involved I only want to see one outcome - the Hedge funds have to cover their position.
Hedge funds are allowed to buy, sell, short, trade options, do whatever they want with GME. Robinhood users are allowed to only sell GME. Conveniently, that makes money for Robinhood's biggest customer, Citadel.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,381
17,935
126
It's sad to see the brokerage firms acting in collusion to stop the trading of a particular stock to help protect the hedge funds from basically losing everything they have because they were stupid. And trying to get the government to intervene because there is market manipulation going on. That's what market makers do all the time, and it's fun to watch something like this. So if buying/selling is restricted that leaves the hedge funds free reign to sit and trade shares among each other at continually lower bids to drive the price down. If the SEC gets involved I only want to see one outcome - the Hedge funds have to cover their position.

Like I said in the other thread, RICO the fuckers.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
In the last hour it went from ~$400, down to $120, and is now ~$250.
Amazing how fast a stock can crater when brokerages illegally cartel to prevent purchasing.

I hope each of these brokerages get sued for losses. What gives them the right to block purchases of a public asset on public market that they do business with?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136
Like I said in the other thread, RICO the fuckers.
Sadly RICO would not be possible because the primary purpose of the organization isn’t crime, but it sure sounds like they are opening themselves up to legal problems.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
All I’m saying is if they are doing that their entire business model is criminal. There is no legal way to use non-public knowledge of incoming orders from your customers to jump in front and skim money.

What you’re referring to is payment for order flow.
"Payment for order flow was pioneered by Bernard Madoff."
Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval right there :)
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136
"Payment for order flow was pioneered by Bernard Madoff."
Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval right there :)
Haha definitely.

Ironically, this might have helped him hide his fraud longer because while lots of people thought he was up to something shady they thought he was front running due to his data on order flow.
 

conehead433

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2002
5,569
901
126
I wish I owned this stock. I think I saw where options expire on 20 million shorted shares tomorrow. The hedge funds have to cover by 4pm as they do not have a choice.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,315
12,890
136
I wish I owned this stock. I think I saw where options expire on 20 million shorted shares tomorrow. The hedge funds have to cover by 4pm as they do not have a choice.
I just saw a link indicating short losses are estimated at $70B right now :oops:
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,133
11,306
136
This is my take as well. I'm watching the ticker bounce all over just for the lulz. I have no GME stock (and no plan to join this game)
I just have £300 in it just to make it more fun. I put that in with the complete understanding that I was basically burning it.
Its pretty difficult to actually buy the stock right now do just sit back and enjoy the show!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nickqt

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
How long are they going to keep blocking Nokia stock? That thing is deep value for a tech stock.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,547
1,127
126
The funny thing is the real winners of this are the large share holders and institutional investors who aren’t shorters. These people thank your for their free billions. At some point they will sell to realize their astronomical gains and when they do it’s going to be an even wilder ride.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,381
17,935
126
The funny thing is the real winners of this are the large share holders and institutional investors who aren’t shorters. These people thank your for their free billions. At some point they will sell to realize their astronomical gains and when they do it’s going to be an even wilder ride.

I doubt they like short traders.