Discussion Game Stop Stock Short Squeeze

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,317
12,895
136
ahahaha 418
So my limited understanding of the situation is that the people who are hardcore on shorting have two options:

1) keep on shorting, and hope it all pays off in the end. As the price goes up, the need to short increases, driving prices even higher in a vicious cycle.
2) bail now and take a massive loss

The first very much sounds like a sunken cost fallacy...

I'm sure there's more to it. Can anyone explain?
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,389
17,936
126
So my limited understanding of the situation is that the people who are hardcore on shorting have two options:

1) keep on shorting, and hope it all pays off in the end. As the price goes up, the need to short increases, driving prices even higher in a vicious cycle.
2) bail now and take a massive loss

The first very much sounds like a sunken cost fallacy...

I'm sure there's more to it. Can anyone explain?

shorters are fucked. The total shorted is 134% (probably more now) of total float stock. There isn't enough stocks to cover all the shorts. I hope GME doesn't issue stocks to bail out short sellers.

Fucking brokerages are slowing retail buyer down, that is bullshit.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,386
16,667
146
So my limited understanding of the situation is that the people who are hardcore on shorting have two options:

1) keep on shorting, and hope it all pays off in the end. As the price goes up, the need to short increases, driving prices even higher in a vicious cycle.
2) bail now and take a massive loss

The first very much sounds like a sunken cost fallacy...

I'm sure there's more to it. Can anyone explain?
Not even sure that they can keep shorting, it's like if you borrowed from Vinnie to pay Jesse, and now both of them are knocking on your door to break your kneecaps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinfamous

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,317
12,895
136
shorters are fucked. The total shorted is 134% (probably more now) of total float stock. There isn't enough stocks to cover all the shorts. I hope GME doesn't issue stocks to bail out short sellers.

Fucking brokerages are slowing retail buyer down, that is bullshit.
By "retail buyers" you mean people who are looking to buy the stock and hold it for some period of time, as opposed to someone making an active bet (short) against GME?
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,389
17,936
126
By "retail buyers" you mean people who are looking to buy the stock and hold it for some period of time, as opposed to someone making an active bet (short) against GME?

retail as in non institution. so you, me and all the people on WSB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenixgoon

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Robinhood has now officially screwed their own users. They are allowed to only sell GME, AMC. BB, NOK, etc. So there are going to be sellers but almost no buyers in those stocks, and prices will be suppressed. Open market manipulation by the broker. That's what you get with free commissions. Robinhood gets its revenues from selling high frequency trading data to Citadel, which was short GME through its investments in Melvin. So that's who they are serving, users are a product they sell.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,985
55,394
136
I feel like no matter what happens the lawsuits that come out of this are going to be bananas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorba

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,985
55,394
136
can someone explain this post to me? I missed something. ....I also have no idea what "418" means. oh stock price. NVM. :D

wasn't it 438 overnight?
In the last hour it went from ~$400, down to $120, and is now ~$250.
 

zzyzxroad

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2017
3,264
2,287
136
retail as in non institution. so you, me and all the people on WSB.
I guess the question I have is before all of this, why would anyone choose to buy GME stock? They are going to die a slow death. Are there folks out there who think they have a future? It seems a sure bet that their stock will continue to drop and assume that is why the hedge funds felt no risk shorting them?
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,317
12,895
136
can someone explain this post to me? I missed something. ....I also have no idea what "418" means.
I'm assuming that was the stock price at one point. Out of curiosity I took a look at the last 5 days of trading and the stock is comically volatile.

9:58am today: 468/share
11:18: 126/share
11:42: 243/share
Now: 207

The higher the stock stays, the more screwed everyone shorting GME is
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,386
16,667
146
I guess the question I have is before all of this, why would anyone choose to buy GME stock? They are going to die a slow death. Are there folks out there who think they have a future? It seems a sure bet that their stock will continue to drop and assume that is why the hedge funds felt no risk shorting them?
Indeed, hedges were so sure of their demise they overbeat the dead horse. Reddit necromancy'd it back from the dead and it started eating the hedge funds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinfamous

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
603
126
I feel like no matter what happens the lawsuits that come out of this are going to be bananas.

I think they've calculated that they're more likely to survive the lawsuits and SEC investigations than they are going to be able to survive the shorts blowing up in their face. And they're probably right, a few campaign contributions will probably buy them out of the worst of it.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
I think they've calculated that they're more likely to survive the lawsuits and SEC investigations than they are going to be able to survive the shorts blowing up in their face. And they're probably right, a few campaign contributions will probably buy them out of the worst of it.
Since users don't pay commissions, RH makes its money from hedge funds giving them kickbacks for front running orders. So when you buy a stock, RH will route it to Citadel, which will buy it first, then sell to you for a bit more. Citadel pays RH for this, they are RH's paying customer, not the users. So if RH is doing what's right for its customers, screwing its users.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
I'm assuming that was the stock price at one point. Out of curiosity I took a look at the last 5 days of trading and the stock is comically volatile.

9:58am today: 468/share
11:18: 126/share
11:42: 243/share
Now: 207

The higher the stock stays, the more screwed everyone shorting GME is

I got it. My first thought from the post only giving that number was that it was some reference to a regulatory code--like "a 418 was just issued! Run!"

I didn't know what "a 418" was. ....and for good reason. :D
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,985
55,394
136
Since users don't pay commissions, RH makes its money from hedge funds giving them kickbacks for front running orders. So when you buy a stock, RH will route it to Citadel, which will buy it first, then sell to you for a bit more. Citadel pays RH for this, they are RH's paying customer, not the users. So if RH is doing what's right for its customers, screwing its users.
I think they are providing overall user data but I doubt their business model is based on front running as that’s a crime.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,134
11,307
136
I sincerely doubt the average person buying GME stock is doing it with the intention of losing money.
I'm kinda that. I bought just for a laugh and a fuck you!

Disclaimer: I'm only in for a few hundred quid, plus I fundamentally disagree with hedge funds (and pretty much the power of stocks)
 
  • Like
Reactions: thilanliyan

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
I think they are providing overall user data but I doubt their business model is based on front running as that’s a crime.
Market makers, such as Citadel Securities or Virtu, pay e-brokers like Robinhood for the right to execute customer trades. The broker is then paid a small fee for the shares that are routed, which can add up to millions when customers trade as actively as they have this year.
Citadel is not paying Robinhood to execute trades for no reason. I am sure it's structured in a legal way, but the effect is the same, they skim off those free trades and pay Robinhood for the privilege. So when Citadel, which is the source of RH's revenue is short and RH's users who don't pay commissions are long a stock, RH is going to serve its actual paying customer.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,389
17,936
126

Citadel is not paying Robinhood to execute trades for no reason. I am sure it's structured in a legal way, but the effect is the same, they skim off those free trades and pay Robinhood for the privilege. So when Citadel, which is the source of RH's revenue is short and RH's users who don't pay commissions are long a stock, RH is going to serve its actual paying customer.

This is a concerted effort by the brokerages... That is called RICO violation. Biden should have Berney head an investigation into this.