• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Furor Over Baptist's 'Gay Baby' Article

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Originally posted by: Citrix
what a moron. i would love to ask him when was the last time he ate pork or shellfish. after all in the eyes of God eating those things are just as unclean as gay sex.

funny how they pick and choose what parts of the bible to follow. :disgust:

Interesting, because in the words of Jesus himself:

Matthew 15:

10Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen and understand. 11What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.' "

12Then the disciples came to him and asked, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?"

13He replied, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14Leave them; they are blind guides.[e] If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."

15Peter said, "Explain the parable to us."

16"Are you still so dull?" Jesus asked them. 17"Don't you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man 'unclean.' 19For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20These are what make a man 'unclean'; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him 'unclean.' "

With this series of statements Jesus declared that the dietary restrictions of Israel did not apply to Christians. Yet another common flamebait argument with no basis in scripture.

show me where Jesus says that being gay is a sin.

Leviticus 18:22

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

hahahah, pathetic. I rest my case.

do you also put your wife out in the barn and wash and wipe down everything in the house too?

"When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening. anything she lies on during her period will be unclean, and anything she sits on will be unclean. Whoever touches her bed must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. Whoever touches anything she sits on must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. Whether it is the bed or anything she was sitting on, when anyone touches it, he will be unclean till evening."

Leviticus 15:19-23

*crickets*

A whole host of archaic/barbaric practices could be considered legitimate with his attitude: slavery (sexual and labor), death for not believing in this particular god, honor killing, genocide, stoning of undesirables/law breakers, the list goes on.

Gay hate too?

Certainly. The Bible can be used to that end (and is all the time).

I attended various Christian schools through HS. My 8th grade religion teacher (a pastor btw) told me point blank in front of the entire class that I was going to hell because I wasn't a Lutheran (I was baptized Greek Orthodox). The total sum of my experiences has forged me into a committed agnostic, if I was inclined to believe in god I would almost certainly be a Deist. Few organized Christian religions actually follow what Christ taught in most ways and have been seriously corrupted for material and political gain over the centuries.

Out of three major Christian religions I had the least amount of trouble with the Catholics oddly enough. They were more than happy to take the check, stfu, and provide a quality education.

It's pastors like those who give Christianity a bad name. Simultaneously, it's people like you who seek to find any excuse to slander Christianity. Founding your entire faith just because you had a problem with one pastor? Agnosticism really is for the lazy.. :roll:
 
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Originally posted by: Citrix
what a moron. i would love to ask him when was the last time he ate pork or shellfish. after all in the eyes of God eating those things are just as unclean as gay sex.

funny how they pick and choose what parts of the bible to follow. :disgust:

Interesting, because in the words of Jesus himself:

Matthew 15:

10Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen and understand. 11What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.' "

12Then the disciples came to him and asked, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?"

13He replied, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14Leave them; they are blind guides.[e] If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."

15Peter said, "Explain the parable to us."

16"Are you still so dull?" Jesus asked them. 17"Don't you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man 'unclean.' 19For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20These are what make a man 'unclean'; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him 'unclean.' "

With this series of statements Jesus declared that the dietary restrictions of Israel did not apply to Christians. Yet another common flamebait argument with no basis in scripture.

show me where Jesus says that being gay is a sin.

Leviticus 18:22

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

hahahah, pathetic. I rest my case.

do you also put your wife out in the barn and wash and wipe down everything in the house too?

"When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening. anything she lies on during her period will be unclean, and anything she sits on will be unclean. Whoever touches her bed must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. Whoever touches anything she sits on must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. Whether it is the bed or anything she was sitting on, when anyone touches it, he will be unclean till evening."

Leviticus 15:19-23

*crickets*

A whole host of archaic/barbaric practices could be considered legitimate with his attitude: slavery (sexual and labor), death for not believing in this particular god, honor killing, genocide, stoning of undesirables/law breakers, the list goes on.

Gay hate too?

Certainly. The Bible can be used to that end (and is all the time).

I attended various Christian schools through HS. My 8th grade religion teacher (a pastor btw) told me point blank in front of the entire class that I was going to hell because I wasn't a Lutheran (I was baptized Greek Orthodox). The total sum of my experiences has forged me into a committed agnostic, if I was inclined to believe in god I would almost certainly be a Deist. Few organized Christian religions actually follow what Christ taught in most ways and have been seriously corrupted for material and political gain over the centuries.

Out of three major Christian religions I had the least amount of trouble with the Catholics oddly enough. They were more than happy to take the check, stfu, and provide a quality education.

It's pastors like those who give Christianity a bad name. Simultaneously, it's people like you who seek to find any excuse to slander Christianity. Founding your entire faith just because you had a problem with one pastor? Agnosticism really is for the lazy.. :roll:

If it makes you feel any better I have very similar criticisms for most organized religions.

The various churches did a rather efficient job at destroying whatever faith I might have possessed. No single incident (not even the above) made me an agnostic, rather it was the sum of my upbringing and my growing ability to employ logic/reason/personal experience to assess them and what I had been taught.

I don't look for every opportunity to slander Christianity. This is the first time I can recall ever posting about my religious experiences and I am typically quite happy to stay out of the religious debates. I usually only get more interested when the overly religious try to influence legislation that reflects their beliefs at the expense of what I would consider to be my rights under what is supposed to be (by tradition and intent) a secular rule of law. The gay issue is pretty much the only one I allow to draw me in since I have a vested interest in how things shake out.
 
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: angminas
Originally posted by: Citrix

again, tell me where Jesus said being gay is a sin. SHOW ME!!!!

i dont understand your line of thinking. you said that being born gay (if its possible) is not a sin, but living gay is. hummm. so a person who is born gay its ok just as long as they dont do anything with the same sex. that pretty f*cked up man. how would you like it that since you were born Hetrosexual and you are very much attracted to women but you cant be with a woman because to do so is a sin, you have to be with men.

Yes people are born gay, and i mean true homosexuals not the people who claim to be BIsexual and are just satisfying their couriosity.

Jesus quoted from and validated the Old Testament dozens of times.

3 Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, "If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread." 4 But He answered and said, "It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God." Matthew 4. The Law such as in the Leviticus quote about homosexuality was told from God directly to Moses. It was words that proceeded from the mouth of God, and Jesus here says men are to live by such. If one doesn't think the Bible is God's word, there's not much point in arguing about how it all fits together. It's like putting together a puzzle with a picture of an elephant when you've never seen an elephant and refuse to believe they exist, then complaining that the pieces aren't making any recognizable picture.

17 "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled." Matthew 5. Some parts of the OT have been FULFILLED, but none of it has been DESTROYED. The law against homosexual behavior is still binding. If it were not, some of my later quotes would be ridiculous and doctrinally false.

In Acts 9, Jesus appears to Saul (later renamed Paul) and tells Saul that he will be told what he must do. (As opposed to, just write whatever you want, and I'll let it slide, whether it's correct or not.) In this chapter Jesus says Saul is "a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel." Later this same Paul, being specifically chosen and guided by Jesus, wrote...

"27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due." Romans 1. There's more in Romans on the subject.

"9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. " 1Cor6. This is not referring to people who are born a certain way and have no choice or control- it's talking about people who know how to behave properly but still choose to do wrong. All homosexual activity is fornication.

"16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2Tim3. At the time Paul wrote this, the New Testament did not exist as such. He clearly says that you must obey the Old Testament to be a man of God. This was in the final letter he wrote, so it's not like he changed his mind later.

This is just a smattering of quotes...there's a lot more. Of course, a verse or two at a time are just that. It is possible to take them out of context and make them look like something they're not. And some people just can't understand the Bible at all.

I have been thankful many times that I was not born homosexual. I have enough problems as it is. I empathize with those who are put in that unenviable position. But I was given things that were wrong or difficult that I needed to overcome, and I have worked hard on them and made progress. This process and my many mistakes have taught me that it's not ok to just do what comes naturally, because when we act naturally, we hurt people. Do people born or raised with bad tempers get to yell and scream (or worse) just because it's difficult and unnatural for them to choose different behavior? Do addictive personalities get a free pass on alcoholism, since they have to completely break away from something they enjoy in order to control the situation? Children are born selfish and unable to understand the feelings of others...should we let them grow up like that so they can be "free" to worship themselves at the expense of others? Are we bigots, bad parents, small minded, control freaks, or crazy Nazi doctors if we teach our children to act how they ought instead of how they want?

NO. What's wrong is wrong, regardless of whether it's easy to change or whether we like it. God says clearly that homosexual behavior is a sin, and since He created the universe, He gets to make the rules. There are many good reasons besides.

Not all trials and difficulties are from God, but He does send some things to us to give us the opportunity to overcome who we used to be.

"2 My brethren, count it all joy when you fall into various trials, 3 knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience. 4 But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing." James 1:2-4.

"3 The refining pot is for silver and the furnace for gold, But the Lord tests the hearts."
Proverbs 17:3.

We are not here to do whatever we feel like. Jesus didn't die horribly so we could lust, murder, envy, hate, or fornicate at will, as long as we say we're sorry every once in a while. He died so that we could have a chance to see what happens in a world where people live by their own laws, under the influence of Satan rather than God. We are here to learn to be more like Jesus...and Jesus obeys the word of the Lord.

So must any Christian.

Gee, all Paul. All the hateful, return to old testament bullsh!t comes from Paul. A man who never met Jesus, but talked to his ghost.

I agree with Thomas Jefferson when it comes to Paul:

Of Paul he said: "Of this band of dupes and impostors, Paul was the great Coryrpheus, the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."

Christians follow Paul, not Jesus. Nine times out of ten when you hear a Christian reference the NT, it will be Paul. Why? Because Paul gives the NT it's hate. It's bitterness, and it's darkness. If Christians had only Jesus, they couldn't find justification for being judgmental little pricks.

Christianity should be called Paulism. This is why so many refer to it as Pauline Christianity.

2 Timothy 3:16

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Any part can be used. All the Bible is correct. So quit being such a moron about it. If you think parts of the Bible are false, then you have no business using it for anything.

And you can't see a problem with the later letters from people claiming to talk to Jesus' ghost saying that simply to justify and validate their submissions?

Think about this: You are quoting Paul to validate Paul.

Ask yourself this: Were the letters written by Paul considered "scripture" by him? If you write your priest an email, is it "scripture?"

If you take ANYTHING on 100% faith without questioning any part of it, I dare say YOU are the moron.

Try thinking for yourself instead of being a mindless sheep.

Paul bastardized Jesus' message and added all the darkness and hate and Roman silliness to the NT. To deny that is to deny reality.
 
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune

It's pastors like those who give Christianity a bad name. Simultaneously, it's people like you who seek to find any excuse to slander Christianity. Founding your entire faith just because you had a problem with one pastor? Agnosticism really is for the lazy.. :roll:

Did your religion teach you to be completely close minded and demeaning of others' opinions too or is that your own free will at work? :roll:

Nothing in his post even came close to 'slander' [sic] though so I guess I'm a little confused on your overly hostile response to an honest question. Are you incapable of accepting that some people just choose not to believe in the same thing you do?
 
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune

1. If you desire to rebel against the Word, then you look at it as an enemy to disprove or slander, that's your choice, I'll move on to people who are a bit more sensible and not so belligerent
In other words, you do not have a sound rational argument and are only capable of preaching to the converted. How sound can your position be if you can only be convincing to people who've already assumed your conclusion?

2. The Word is God, if you disbelieve one part you break down the entire point of the faith and the book. Surely your intelligent enough to see that. You dont pick your points, its either all true or all doubted.
False dilemma fallacy, and the idea that a book is God is simply lunacy. No wonder rational arguments are so alien to you.

3. rebuttal. Quit being so foolish as to think your site is the only theory floating around.
In what way do you think that rebuts anything in the link I supplied?


 
Didn't Joseph Smith receive visions of Jesus Christ and isn't his Book of Momonism based off what Jesus had told him. So, by thecoolnessrune's standard, wouldn't Mormonism be the latest and greatest trend for Christians to believe? How often are secondary testimonials actually accurate? Even a basic game like telephone shows how accurate people are when passing on messages. Would everyone believe me if I told them that I spoke to Jesus last night and he told me not to believe what Paul wrote?
 
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Didn't Joseph Smith receive visions of Jesus Christ and isn't his Book of Momonism based off what Jesus had told him. So, by thecoolnessrune's standard, wouldn't Mormonism be the latest and greatest trend for Christians to believe? How often are secondary testimonials actually accurate? Even a basic game like telephone shows how accurate people are when passing on messages. Would everyone believe me if I told them that I spoke to Jesus last night and he told me not to believe what Paul wrote?

Jesus, he knows me, and he knows I'm right.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Didn't Joseph Smith receive visions of Jesus Christ and isn't his Book of Momonism based off what Jesus had told him. So, by thecoolnessrune's standard, wouldn't Mormonism be the latest and greatest trend for Christians to believe? How often are secondary testimonials actually accurate? Even a basic game like telephone shows how accurate people are when passing on messages. Would everyone believe me if I told them that I spoke to Jesus last night and he told me not to believe what Paul wrote?

Jesus, he knows me, and he knows I'm right.

He talked to you too? What are the chances!
 
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Didn't Joseph Smith receive visions of Jesus Christ and isn't his Book of Momonism based off what Jesus had told him. So, by thecoolnessrune's standard, wouldn't Mormonism be the latest and greatest trend for Christians to believe? How often are secondary testimonials actually accurate? Even a basic game like telephone shows how accurate people are when passing on messages. Would everyone believe me if I told them that I spoke to Jesus last night and he told me not to believe what Paul wrote?

Jesus, he knows me, and he knows I'm right.

He talked to you too? What are the chances!

He's been talking to Jesus, all his life.
 
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: aidanjm

there is ample evidence that the genes coding for homosexuality in males also tend to confer greater fertility in women. Women with gay male relatives - uncles, etc. - have more babies than women with no gay men in the family. Thus genes coding for homosexuality in men can remain in circulation because they provides some evolutionary advantage (i.e., greater fertility leading to higher reproductive success) under some circumstances (e.g., when they are expressed in women).


You could also look at it another way- maybe some families' bloodlines just have high levels of estrogen, making the women more fertile and the men more feminine.

"high levels" of estrogen don't make women more fertile, nor do high levels of estrogen (in the womb prior to his birth, or circulating in an adult man's blood stream) increase the chances a male will be homosexual.


Higher levels of estrogen do in fact make women more fertile. This is a scientific fact. Women more lower levels of estrogen will tend to be less fertile.
 
I'd put my money on Paul being a closet homosexual and possibly even a pedophile seeing how people tend to preach hardest against things that they hate about themselves.
 
As homosexuality is deviant and has implications for a child's ability to have a normal life, I would avoid it with a simple harmless treatment in the womb if I could. I want my children to be as happy and normal as possible.
 
if there is a biological basis for homosexuality, that 'excuses' very many people, right? but dictating someone away from their own biology is just plain stupid. all you are going to get is a sober drunk.
 
Originally posted by: judasmachine
if there is a biological basis for homosexuality, that 'excuses' very many people, right? but dictating someone away from their own biology is just plain stupid. all you are going to get is a sober drunk.

I'm going to assume you're not being a troll, but actually believe this.

If you think a sober drunk isn't better than a drunk drunk, you've never lived with a practicing alcoholic. And if you think dictating someone away from their biology is stupid, you've never been raped. And if you have experienced these kind of things and still think they're ok, you've got some serious issues of your own and should not be giving others advice until you get your own problems in hand.

I don't often jump on particular foolish statements, because anyone can say something dumb, but what you wrote here is one of the least insightful and responsible things I have ever read.

And this is the extremely nice way of putting it.
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: angminas
Originally posted by: Citrix

again, tell me where Jesus said being gay is a sin. SHOW ME!!!!

i dont understand your line of thinking. you said that being born gay (if its possible) is not a sin, but living gay is. hummm. so a person who is born gay its ok just as long as they dont do anything with the same sex. that pretty f*cked up man. how would you like it that since you were born Hetrosexual and you are very much attracted to women but you cant be with a woman because to do so is a sin, you have to be with men.

Yes people are born gay, and i mean true homosexuals not the people who claim to be BIsexual and are just satisfying their couriosity.

Jesus quoted from and validated the Old Testament dozens of times.

3 Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, "If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread." 4 But He answered and said, "It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God." Matthew 4. The Law such as in the Leviticus quote about homosexuality was told from God directly to Moses. It was words that proceeded from the mouth of God, and Jesus here says men are to live by such. If one doesn't think the Bible is God's word, there's not much point in arguing about how it all fits together. It's like putting together a puzzle with a picture of an elephant when you've never seen an elephant and refuse to believe they exist, then complaining that the pieces aren't making any recognizable picture.

17 "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled." Matthew 5. Some parts of the OT have been FULFILLED, but none of it has been DESTROYED. The law against homosexual behavior is still binding. If it were not, some of my later quotes would be ridiculous and doctrinally false.

In Acts 9, Jesus appears to Saul (later renamed Paul) and tells Saul that he will be told what he must do. (As opposed to, just write whatever you want, and I'll let it slide, whether it's correct or not.) In this chapter Jesus says Saul is "a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel." Later this same Paul, being specifically chosen and guided by Jesus, wrote...

"27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due." Romans 1. There's more in Romans on the subject.

"9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. " 1Cor6. This is not referring to people who are born a certain way and have no choice or control- it's talking about people who know how to behave properly but still choose to do wrong. All homosexual activity is fornication.

"16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2Tim3. At the time Paul wrote this, the New Testament did not exist as such. He clearly says that you must obey the Old Testament to be a man of God. This was in the final letter he wrote, so it's not like he changed his mind later.

This is just a smattering of quotes...there's a lot more. Of course, a verse or two at a time are just that. It is possible to take them out of context and make them look like something they're not. And some people just can't understand the Bible at all.

I have been thankful many times that I was not born homosexual. I have enough problems as it is. I empathize with those who are put in that unenviable position. But I was given things that were wrong or difficult that I needed to overcome, and I have worked hard on them and made progress. This process and my many mistakes have taught me that it's not ok to just do what comes naturally, because when we act naturally, we hurt people. Do people born or raised with bad tempers get to yell and scream (or worse) just because it's difficult and unnatural for them to choose different behavior? Do addictive personalities get a free pass on alcoholism, since they have to completely break away from something they enjoy in order to control the situation? Children are born selfish and unable to understand the feelings of others...should we let them grow up like that so they can be "free" to worship themselves at the expense of others? Are we bigots, bad parents, small minded, control freaks, or crazy Nazi doctors if we teach our children to act how they ought instead of how they want?

NO. What's wrong is wrong, regardless of whether it's easy to change or whether we like it. God says clearly that homosexual behavior is a sin, and since He created the universe, He gets to make the rules. There are many good reasons besides.

Not all trials and difficulties are from God, but He does send some things to us to give us the opportunity to overcome who we used to be.

"2 My brethren, count it all joy when you fall into various trials, 3 knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience. 4 But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing." James 1:2-4.

"3 The refining pot is for silver and the furnace for gold, But the Lord tests the hearts."
Proverbs 17:3.

We are not here to do whatever we feel like. Jesus didn't die horribly so we could lust, murder, envy, hate, or fornicate at will, as long as we say we're sorry every once in a while. He died so that we could have a chance to see what happens in a world where people live by their own laws, under the influence of Satan rather than God. We are here to learn to be more like Jesus...and Jesus obeys the word of the Lord.

So must any Christian.

Do me and yourself a favor and research what a natural Eunuch is and what Jesus said about them.

also you didnt answer my question if you consider women unclean when they have their period. if you are married or plan to be, will you follow the word of God and wash everything she touches while she is on her period?

I am going to bold this so you dont miss it.

im still waiting for an answer... do you know what a natural Eunuch is, and do you put your wife out in the barn and wash and wipe down everything she touches because she is unclean when she has her period?

im just wondering, if you say the laws in Leviticus are still valid today why do you pick and choose which laws to follow. im really curious to know why you dont follow all the laws, well besides the burnt offerings because jesus was the burnt offering and we no longer have to do that one, but the others are still valid by your logic. well of course the ones you choose to follow and the ones you choose to ignore.
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
I doubt science could ever take the place of nature, but since we have wandered so far from what we should be, perhaps it would be a step in the right direction?

Who gets to decide "what we should be?"

 
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.


Nobody chooses to be a homosexual;you are born homosexual. The same people that says homosexuality is a choice are the same ones saying the plane will fly. BAI below average intelligence.
 
Originally posted by: MasonLuke
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.


Nobody chooses to be a homosexual;you are born homosexual. The same people that says homosexuality is a choice are the same ones saying the plane will fly. BAI below average intelligence.

Well, one outta two ain't bad, I guess.

Homosexuality is innate, and the plane will fly.
 
Originally posted by: MasonLuke
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.


Nobody chooses to be a homosexual;you are born homosexual. The same people that says homosexuality is a choice are the same ones saying the plane will fly. BAI below average intelligence.

how do you own yourself so badly?
 
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.

Yup. Read the Bible folks. Homosexuality is a passion and a sin. That's not to say that I think they should be stopped eternally; people are entitled to their passions and opinions even if it is a sin, and I sure as hell am not going to stop them.
EDIT: I do believe it is possible that some people are born homosexual. If it is proven genetically, I will concur.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: MasonLuke
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.


Nobody chooses to be a homosexual;you are born homosexual. The same people that says homosexuality is a choice are the same ones saying the plane will fly. BAI below average intelligence.

how do you own yourself so badly?

Or not been banned already for blatant trolling and insults.
 
Originally posted by: 40sTheme
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.

Yup. Read the Bible folks. Homosexuality is a passion and a sin. That's not to say that I think they should be stopped eternally; people are entitled to their passions and opinions even if it is a sin, and I sure as hell am not going to stop them.
EDIT: I do believe it is possible that some people are born homosexual. If it is proven genetically, I will concur.
Twin studies show a much higher concordance of homosexuality between identical twins than fraternal twins. So, genetics is undoubtedly a predictive factor. Otoh, the concordance isn't 100%, so it's not the only factor.
 
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: 40sTheme
Originally posted by: MBrown
Homosexuality is a choice /thread.

Yup. Read the Bible folks. Homosexuality is a passion and a sin. That's not to say that I think they should be stopped eternally; people are entitled to their passions and opinions even if it is a sin, and I sure as hell am not going to stop them.
EDIT: I do believe it is possible that some people are born homosexual. If it is proven genetically, I will concur.
Twin studies show a much higher concordance of homosexuality between identical twins than fraternal twins. So, genetics is undoubtedly a predictive factor. Otoh, the concordance isn't 100%, so it's not the only factor.

Huh, that's very interesting. I'd really like to see some solidifying genetic evidence before just broad statistical research, though. That's some pretty hard evidence there though.
 
Back
Top