Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: mugs
<--------- My point
*Your head*
One of the key components of natural selection is that the organisms with the most favorable traits survive to reproduce. Homosexuals can't reproduce (at least through their preferred sexual activity).
Evolving doesn't always equate to a positive outcome. Your point was that homosexuality is not evolution because of their inability to reproduce, thus it should be treated as a defect. My point was that evolution doesn't always mean a positive outcome but is evolution nevertheless. I'm pretty sure we're just arguing about nothing at this point.
no, it's not evolution. Evolution is firmly rooted in passing your genetic material to the next generation. It's a defect.
actually, women who have gay male relatives are more successful in passing their genetic material to the next generation. they have more babies - they are more fertile - than women who do not have any gay men in their family. obviously these women share genes with the gay men. presumably the genes leading to homosexuality in males tend to confer greater fertility when expressed in females.
