- Oct 31, 2005
- 5,695
- 0
- 0
Because a lot of our allies don't have much of a military, so we need a big one. I fear where our country would be if we didn't spend as much on defense and military seeing as so much of the world hates us.
Oh good grief. The logic is strong with this one.Originally posted by: BlancoNino
What the hell are you guys talking about?
HISTORY LESSON: SCHOOLS FUNCTIONED WITHOUT FREE LUNCH BEFORE AND EDUCATION WAS EVEN HIGHER AT THE TIME!
Question: Why should my tax dollars be spent for parents who have children when they can't afford to feed them? How is that my fault?
Question: If these kids are 5 years old at school, they were obviously fed up until then, so why can the parents suddenly not afford to feed them? Oh well, with that extra money in their parents pocket, they can go by some more booze and watch hours of mindless cable television.
Oh good grief. The logic is strong with this one.
NOT.
:roll:
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Because a lot of our allies don't have much of a military, so we need a big one. I fear where our country would be if we didn't spend as much on defense and military seeing as so much of the world hates us.
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: ZeGermans
Here's the main reason I support school lunches for those that can't afford it:
How is it the child's fault? You conservatives are extremely concerned with the life of a fetus before it leaves the womb... then you just wash your hands of it. Why should the child pay for the unneeded extravagance of the parents? If they want to screw themselves into a grave, that's just fine. But the children will have a chance with free public education, free school lunches, and tons of scholarship oppurtunities. Obviously this path will be tougher for them than it would be for someone that was born rich, but it at least tries to level the playing field. That's why school lunches, public education in general, and scholarships are free.
But the vast majority of these children can get fed by their parents. The poor live pretty damn well in this country. No, I don't want children to go hungry, but really free lunch is just the government being the babysitter and it gives excuses for people to have children when they can't afford to feed them.
If you didn't have that military, there'd be little to "hate" you for. The military actions and other International events that are the cause of friction between the US and the RoW.
Two points:Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Because a lot of our allies don't have much of a military, so we need a big one. I fear where our country would be if we didn't spend as much on defense and military seeing as so much of the world hates us.
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
What the hell are you guys talking about?
HISTORY LESSON: SCHOOLS FUNCTIONED WITHOUT FREE LUNCH BEFORE AND EDUCATION WAS EVEN HIGHER AT THE TIME!
Question: Why should my tax dollars be spent for parents who have children when they can't afford to feed them? How is that my fault?
Question: If these kids are 5 years old at school, they were obviously fed up until then, so why can the parents suddenly not afford to feed them? Oh well, with that extra money in their parents pocket, they can go by some more booze and watch hours of mindless cable television.
You're new here so I guess I'll have to explain it:Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Usually when somebody says something like that, they back it up with some facts or some good solid points.Oh good grief. The logic is strong with this one.
NOT.
:roll:
Well said. It's a shame so many will refuse to accept this, either due to ingrained ignorance or to their compulsion to rationalize their greed. One of the things I liked least about Ronald Reagan is he demonized welfare recipients. Sure, as you point out, there are some who abuse the system. I agree they are a tiny minority, however.Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
What the hell are you guys talking about?
HISTORY LESSON: SCHOOLS FUNCTIONED WITHOUT FREE LUNCH BEFORE AND EDUCATION WAS EVEN HIGHER AT THE TIME!
Question: Why should my tax dollars be spent for parents who have children when they can't afford to feed them? How is that my fault?
Question: If these kids are 5 years old at school, they were obviously fed up until then, so why can the parents suddenly not afford to feed them? Oh well, with that extra money in their parents pocket, they can go by some more booze and watch hours of mindless cable television.
Are you an f'ing idiot? My mom raised me and my brother more or less by herself from the time I was 10. (I'm 33 now - So no crap about me being a stupid kid) Child support was spotty at best. We didn't have cable TV. My mom doesn't drink. The free lunch program at school saved her $250/month that she wastfully frittered away on heating oil and grand shopping excursions to the Salvation Army thrift store for clothes for me and my brother.
I've told this story on here a few times. After her divorce, and having no work experience up to that point, it was a rough time. It took her most of two years to get herself to the point that she could support us all but she did it.
I hate idiot people who bag on welfare and try to make it look like anyone who needs some assistance is a deadbeat. I honestly believe that most of the people on assistance are working their butts off to get off of it. There will always be people who try to game the system and others who commit outright fraud. That is no reason to lump every person who is on assistance into the 'drunk, incompetent, loser' camp.
Grow up.
Complete nonsense, factually untrue, and totally missing the point. Try again.Originally posted by: BlancoNino
As for our military spending being far greater than all the countries together, keep in mind that we have, by far, the highest population of a nation that isn't 3rd world or doesn't have a military. The United States' population is equal to roughly 40% of ALL OF EUROPE, and a lot of European countries don't have a military. So it's easy to see why our military is so vast.
Such stories aren't rare at all, that's the point. It's the "welfare queen" instances that are extremely rare.Whoozyerdaddy, the fact that stories like yours are so rare is really why I am against government help. I think private charities and helping eachother out without the government slamming it's big, ugly, giant fist into your mouth while using the other to pull money out of your pocket is much more efficient and it makes the person who made the donation feel better knowing he did it on his own free will and knowing that it's going to somebody who actually needs it.
Complete nonsense, factually untrue, and totally missing the point. Try again.
Such stories aren't rare at all, that's the point. It's the "welfare queen" instances that are extremely rare
Originally posted by: conjur
Wow. Again with the complete and utter lack of use of logic when posting.
Do you actually stop and try to think or is this some stream-of-consciousness posting that is channeling Limbaugh and Hannity?
Start here.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Two points:Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Because a lot of our allies don't have much of a military, so we need a big one. I fear where our country would be if we didn't spend as much on defense and military seeing as so much of the world hates us.
1) You continue to avoid the question of why it is reasonable and necessary to spend more than the rest of the world combined. Are you suggesting that there is no waste by the Pentagon, that the only way to have a world-class military is to make it a bottomless pit for spending? If so, how is it that other countries' militaries pose any threat to us since their funding is proportionally a pittance compared to ours?
2) Why does so much of the world "hate" us? Perhaps if the U.S. wasn't such a meddling bully, the rest of the world wouldn't "hate" us so. Think of all the productive ways we could use, say 30% of our military budget, if we worked to get along with the world and didn't need to worry quite so much about them hating us.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
What the hell are you guys talking about?
HISTORY LESSON: SCHOOLS FUNCTIONED WITHOUT FREE LUNCH BEFORE AND EDUCATION WAS EVEN HIGHER AT THE TIME!
Question: Why should my tax dollars be spent for parents who have children when they can't afford to feed them? How is that my fault?
Question: If these kids are 5 years old at school, they were obviously fed up until then, so why can the parents suddenly not afford to feed them? Oh well, with that extra money in their parents pocket, they can go by some more booze and watch hours of mindless cable television.
Are you an f'ing idiot? My mom raised me and my brother more or less by herself from the time I was 10. (I'm 33 now - So no crap about me being a stupid kid) Child support was spotty at best. We didn't have cable TV. My mom doesn't drink. The free lunch program at school saved her $250/month that she wastfully frittered away on heating oil and grand shopping excursions to the Salvation Army thrift store for clothes for me and my brother.
I've told this story on here a few times. After her divorce, and having no work experience up to that point, it was a rough time. It took her most of two years to get herself to the point that she could support us all but she did it.
I hate idiot people who bag on welfare and try to make it look like anyone who needs some assistance is a deadbeat. I honestly believe that most of the people on assistance are working their butts off to get off of it. There will always be people who try to game the system and others who commit outright fraud. That is no reason to lump every person who is on assistance into the 'drunk, incompetent, loser' camp.
Grow up.
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Bowfinger, I don't think we need to downsize our military at all. Did the cold war end when the military was downsized during the Carter administration? Do you think Radical Muslim terrorists will hestitate to attack us if we dramatically downsize our military? The rest of the world doesn't hate us because of our military.
It's the useage.
If I attacked you, would your neighbors be jealous of my strength?Originally posted by: BlancoNino
of course countries that we use our military on hate us but why do others hate us? Jealous?It's the useage.