waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
Now you are trolling.
he is either trolling or as stupid as he is letting on. either way no use in debating with him. he can't understand the points you make.
lol truck in the water. /facepalm
Now you are trolling.
he is either trolling or as stupid as he is letting on. either way no use in debating with him. he can't understand the points you make.
lol truck in the water. /facepalm
I just did some research.
1 acre foot of water = 326,000 gallons. From my link above - 143 million of acre feet is about 46,618,000,000,000 gallons. Yeah, let truck all of those water. LOL.
Goodness, can you get it through your head? It is not just financial expensive but it is NOT feasible to truck the VAST amount of water for US agriculture. It is impossible to do so logistically.
Geometry? Tell me, with these trucks, how fast can they unload the water in gallons per hour? How many hours would it take. Now how many hours does it normally take to water said fields.We have been over this. If it's SO VAST, how can they possible plant all that corn? How can they get the manpower to harvest it all?
If you can water a 10X10 plot with x gallons of water, you can water 100000 such plots with 100000x water.
It scales. Linearly. Go back to middle school and study geometry so you can understand this concept. At NO point whatsoever does the size stop scaling linearly and go into the realm of impossible.
I just did some research.
1 acre foot of water = 326,000 gallons. From my link above - 143 million of acre feet is about 46,618,000,000,000 gallons. Yeah, let truck all of those water. LOL.
A large truck is able to hold about 10,000 gallons. That would be a lot of trucks.
Anyone who thinks we can just truck over all that water is an idiot lol
Geometry? Tell me, with these trucks, how fast can they unload the water in gallons per hour? How many hours would it take. Now how many hours does it normally take to water said fields.
On top of this, where are all the trucks going to physically be? Matter can't occupy the same space, so you have a bit of an issue trying to drive them all to one spot.
You could for certain plants especially if you used Israel irrigation.
Don't want to be an idiot but what's Israel irrigation?
Back on topic, I see a few people mentioned stocking up on beef now.
Wrong move. Because of so many failed corn crops, farmers aren't going to be able to afford to feed their cattle. The market is going to be flooded because farmers will downsize their herds. That's going to make the price of beef go down. (Though, then it will go back up later, as supply will drop.)
how will this affect smaller towns and tucked away cities where everyone goes to a farmers market? i think bigger cities and major chains will suffer the most.
Back on topic, I see a few people mentioned stocking up on beef now.
Wrong move. Because of so many failed corn crops, farmers aren't going to be able to afford to feed their cattle. The market is going to be flooded because farmers will downsize their herds. That's going to make the price of beef go down. (Though, then it will go back up later, as supply will drop.)
Oh damn that didn't take long to go down the pipeline.That won't happen this time because they already have downsized the herds.
We just ate at Panda Express and they added $2 at the checkout because they now add more money if you order beef.
Expect this to be the norm and expect that $2 to go up and up.
I hate false advertising
The menu will say $5 for the dish but there will be a little star and below says add $5 for beef
Advertise it at $10 mother fuckers
Back on topic, I see a few people mentioned stocking up on beef now.
Wrong move. Because of so many failed corn crops, farmers aren't going to be able to afford to feed their cattle. The market is going to be flooded because farmers will downsize their herds. That's going to make the price of beef go down. (Though, then it will go back up later, as supply will drop.)
