Poor AMD...
On the bright side, Jaguar's probably going to sell great. Not sure why AMD is worrying about e-Peen for enthusiasts when we all know that AMD's woefully behind here.
AMD doesnt need your sympathy nor mine. :biggrin:
Poor AMD...
On the bright side, Jaguar's probably going to sell great. Not sure why AMD is worrying about e-Peen for enthusiasts when we all know that AMD's woefully behind here.
So it really is that expensive ....
Overclocking results will be worth reading. See what the 9370 can reach VS the 800 dollar gem.
They are adding the caches together. From the 8350 specs.
- 8MB L3 Cache
- 4 x 2MB L2 Cache
Using any benchmark for AMD chips looks to be laughable from the results shown in the original post. I never implied Fritz Chess was the be all, end all benchmark. However AMD's latest, greatest, near $1000 effort shouldn't be taken to task by my four year old W3520.Using Fritz Chess for AMD chips has already been proven laughable, just as much as SuperPi.
Intel Chips are optimized in Fritz Chess.
So, I'm confused as to why I'm supposed to be excited yet.
Using any benchmark for AMD chips looks to be laughable from the results shown in the original post. I never implied Fritz Chess was the be all, end all benchmark. However AMD's latest, greatest, near $1000 effort shouldn't be taken to task by my four year old W3520.
How is Fritz optimized for Intel?
The same way the highway is optimized for a Lamborghini diablo, how else can you explain the discrepancy between the diablo's top speed and that of my Prius?
Clearly it is the road, made by those damned biased prejudicial road engineers and construction workers, on the take from Lamborghini of course.
Another fucking retarded analogy, congratulations.
Goodbye Anandtech, won't miss you.
I was not directly comparing my $200 2500k to the $1000 FX chip. it was a direct reply to power consumption not being important if overclocking anyway. as you can see many people still can oc and have a VERY efficient chip.But even at 4.4 it will be vastly inferior in MT tasks
so what s your point.?..
http://techreport.com/review/23750/amd-fx-8350-processor-reviewed/13
btw , wonderfull your 2500k , since according
to TR it s 103W at stocks in x264 , a task hardly
as TDP hungry that Linx , isnt it...
http://techreport.com/review/23750/amd-fx-8350-processor-reviewed/4
Another fucking retarded analogy, congratulations.
Another fucking retarded analogy, congratulations.
Goodbye Anandtech, won't miss you.
The same way the highway is optimized for a Lamborghini diablo, how else can you explain the discrepancy between the diablo's top speed and that of my Prius?
Clearly it is the road, made by those damned biased prejudicial road engineers and construction workers, on the take from Lamborghini of course.
Seems a lot of people on AT forum got upset because of a chip they wouldn't ever buy. It's interesting since this chip @ stock performs rather well, apart from power draw which seems to be the "new concern" among the enthusiasts.![]()
http://crazyworldofchips.blogspot.com.br/search?updated-max=2012-10-29T13:51:00-07:00&max-results=7
(...)
So what we need is 95W 3.6Ghz FX8150, 125W 4Ghz 8170 and 4-4.2 Ghz 125W 8270 (Piledriver).
This lineup would hold off SB and IB ,at least in mid and mid-high performance segments,without many problems.
125W 8350 does OK against SB/IB. It's not better all around chip but is priced much lower.
Another *bleeping* retarded analogy, congratulations.
Goodbye Anandtech, won't miss you.
+1
Although I stay around for the entertainment value.But agree %101 on the attempted sarcastic wittiness of those retarted analogies.
Another fucking retarded analogy, congratulations.
Goodbye Anandtech, won't miss you.
hit or miss...very much miss...
Well , it is , how to say , so XXth century....
+1
Although I stay around for the entertainment value.But agree %101 on the attempted sarcastic wittiness of those retarted analogies.
Using any benchmark for AMD chips looks to be laughable from the results shown in the original post. I never implied Fritz Chess was the be all, end all benchmark. However AMD's latest, greatest, near $1000 effort shouldn't be taken to task by my four year old W3520.
:biggrin:Help me, I'm an idiot. I am trying to do that stupid x264 FHD benchmark and I tried unzipping, installing, clicking the damn thing and I can't figure it out. I need to make sure that I am not challenged by an AMD cpu. This is critical to my self esteem. So how do I do this benchmark?
Another fucking retarded analogy, congratulations.
Goodbye Anandtech, won't miss you.
hit or miss...very much miss...
Well , it is , how to say , so XXth century....
Oh the analogy wasn't intended for the purpose you folks think, but it did bring out the hater-brigade which is very much helpful info.
Thanks for raising your hands and getting your circle-jerk on. The information is helpful.
