Firefox is NOT the holy grail

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
I'm sick of CPU usage skyrocketing to 100% for no reason, and I'm sick of RAM usage going up to over 9000 MB. I've got a 1.73 GHz Dothan and 2 GB of RAM; browsing the internet shouldn't make me feel like I'm using a Pentium 200 MMX. Flash shouldn't randomly stop playing sound and failing to play more than 2 seconds of video because Firefox has been open for more than five minutes.

IE is swiss cheese into my Windows kernel; I'm not about to start using it and open my computer up to being compromised. Safari sucks, let it stay on Mac (I downloaded it the day it came out, too many incompatibilities and uglyness with its weird font smoothing). I guess I'm going to try Opera....
 

MaxDepth

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2001
8,757
43
91
Have you tried FireFox 3 Beta Five (or Beta 3)?

There is a huge world of differences between two and three. I was about to give up on it myself.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
I left Firefox for Opera a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Opera.
 

Trogdor91

Senior member
Sep 22, 2004
905
0
0
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
I'm sick of CPU usage skyrocketing to 100% for no reason, and I'm sick of RAM usage going up to over 9000 MB. I've got a 1.73 GHz Dothan and 2 GB of RAM; browsing the internet shouldn't make me feel like I'm using a Pentium 200 MMX. Flash shouldn't randomly stop playing sound and failing to play more than 2 seconds of video because Firefox has been open for more than five minutes.

IE is swiss cheese into my Windows kernel; I'm not about to start using it and open my computer up to being compromised. Safari sucks, let it stay on Mac (I downloaded it the day it came out, too many incompatibilities and uglyness with its weird font smoothing). I guess I'm going to try Opera....

OVER 9000?!
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
I think your rigs has problems beyond FF with those numbers.

Been using it for years, never had any usage remotely that large even with 30 some odd tabs open.
 

Bill Brasky

Diamond Member
May 18, 2006
4,324
1
0
Firefox 3b really is fast, and has some great features. I'm just waiting for better addon support.

edit: Surely he meant 900 mb.
 

effowe

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2004
6,012
18
81
Originally posted by: irishScott
I think your rigs has problems beyond FF with those numbers.

Been using it for years, never had any usage remotely that large even with 30 some odd tabs open.

QFT, give FF 3.0b5 a shot, much was done to improve speed / memory usage.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
176
106
It's over 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I took out 100 or so ! as they were messing up the formatting.

Moderator allisolm
 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
I love Opera. Although once in a while it does spike my laptop to 100% for a bit (I think this may be Flash-related). And it doesn't quite work right on my work PC (Windows 2000). Nevertheless, I can't believe I stuck it out with IE for so long...
 

Vehemence

Banned
Jan 25, 2008
5,943
0
0
Opera makes my heart and pants swell. Unfortunately Roboform doesn't work on it so I'm forced to use IE7/FF sometimes.
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
Firefox 3.5 beta seems to be faster to me.

Plus to load up on a million plug-ins and then expect it to run as smooth as it would with none.
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: irishScott
I think your rigs has problems beyond FF with those numbers.

Been using it for years, never had any usage remotely that large even with 30 some odd tabs open.

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/IT'S_OVER_NINE_THOUSAND!

Windows would crash before something could rack up 9000 MB VM usage :laugh:


Opera rocks my socks, rendering engine is way faster, and I don't have any weird Firefox plugins. Just DownthemAll and Adblock Plus. I might try FF3, after my Operagasm ends.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Are we supposed to pretend that this is normal standard functionality for firefox version 2? Because it isn't.
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: clamum
I left Firefox for Opera a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Opera.

I left Firefox for Internet Explorer a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Internet Explorer.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
Originally posted by: clamum
I left Firefox for Opera a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Opera.

I left Firefox for Internet Explorer a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Internet Explorer.

Sins....
 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,185
2
0
I've never had a problem with Firefox. It might eat a lot of RAM, but unless I watch in the process monitor I would never know. I have 2GB for a reason and between VS 2005, Eclipse, and Flex Builder 3, Apache, Tomcat, Photoshop -- FF is the least offensive app I have running when it comes to RAM.

Given the choice between a browser with shit for standards support and add-ons and FF eating a little RAM -- hard choice, really.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
I didn't have a problem with FF2, mem. usage did creep up a bit but not much unless I left it up for about a week or so.

FF3 though, wow, I didn't know it could get this good, it's performance beats the you know what out of IE et. all.
 

T9D

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
5,320
6
0
There are a lot of things that I dislike about firefox (and a couple bugs too). I still use it though because of the adblock.