SP33Demon
Lifer
- Jun 22, 2001
- 27,928
- 143
- 106
Dam right!Originally posted by: jjsole
And I'm sick of there not being a Software forum around here!![]()
Dam right!Originally posted by: jjsole
And I'm sick of there not being a Software forum around here!![]()
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Gotta love all the people who took 9000 literally. It's an exaggeration used to point out that Firefox is a leaky monster of an app.
Web 2.0 involves a lot more than simply rendering HTML. I don't think it's the raw speed that hurts you, but not having an extra core. This means if you're rendering a flash app or JavaScript heavy page, if the CPU pegs and you have anything else running that wants those CPU cycles as well, you're going to notice lag.Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
The default GMail layout is actually fairly processor intensive. It slows down, but doesn't halt things on my 630MHz EEE PC, probably because I've slimmed down Windows with nLite and don't have many background tasks and services running. On my 1.9GHz dual-core desktop, it can peg one of the cores to 100% (although typical load seems to be 20-30% for both cores, though, so 40-60% of a single core).Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Originally posted by: mugs
Glad I'm not the only one who has Firefox spontaneously consume 100% of my CPU time. I'm really starting to hate it.
I can't even find a link between all the times it's happened. I used to think it was because of Flash, I've had FF spike to 100% trying to load GMail. No Flash there. Sometimes the only way out is to kill the process.
To me it sounds more like an old computer issue. At the bottom of the page, you can select basic HTML layout for GMail instead of the fancier default layout, I'd suggest trying that out and seeing how it effects speed. Also, I'd recommend downloading Flashblock to get rid of useless flash content. By default it will block all flash content, but will leave a placeholder where the flash content would be, and by clicking on the placeholder, you can allow the flash to be displayed. It also lets you whitelist sites you don't want it to block (for example if you visit YouTube a lot, or flash gaming sites, you'd probably want to whitelist those). It's a fantastic little plugin, I use it on my EEE and it works great.
Dothan 1.73 GHz = old, but I sure hope you're not suggested it's too slow for the INTERNETS. Come on now. I'm not complaining about Crysis...
Originally posted by: irishScott
I think your rigs has problems beyond FF with those numbers.
Been using it for years, never had any usage remotely that large even with 30 some odd tabs open.
Originally posted by: Eeezee
9000 MB of RAM? I've never seen it go beyond 500MB, and I run a bunch of Ad plugins.
How are you getting Firefox to go beyond a gig of RAM?
Originally posted by: jaqie
Welcome to realityOriginally posted by: mrSHEiK124
I'm going to try Opera.![]()
Originally posted by: MaxDepth
Have you tried FireFox 3 Beta Five (or Beta 3)?
There is a huge world of differences between two and three. I was about to give up on it myself.
Originally posted by: Zaitsev
Firefox 3b really is fast, and has some great features. I'm just waiting for better addon support.
edit: Surely he meant 900 mb.
Originally posted by: check
my computer is currently running at 0-4%
I've never had my computer run at 100% (or 50% since I have a dual core) because of firefox...
to the OP
what kind of computer are you using?
I've got a 1.73 GHz Dothan and 2 GB of RAM
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
IE is swiss cheese into my Windows kernel; I'm not about to start using it and open my computer up to being compromised.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: check
my computer is currently running at 0-4%
I've never had my computer run at 100% (or 50% since I have a dual core) because of firefox...
to the OP
what kind of computer are you using?
www.hop.com worked for me
I've got a 1.73 GHz Dothan and 2 GB of RAM
Originally posted by: check
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: check
my computer is currently running at 0-4%
I've never had my computer run at 100% (or 50% since I have a dual core) because of firefox...
to the OP
what kind of computer are you using?
www.hop.com worked for me
I've got a 1.73 GHz Dothan and 2 GB of RAM
The processor doesn't tell me what kind of computer he has.
If it's a Dothan then he most likely has a laptop, and I'm asking what kind. The reason I'm asking is because some IBMs have a glitch with the battery management software they use which causes the CPU to randomly jump to 100%
but you know you could just be a dick about it... that's really helpful afterall
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
IE is swiss cheese into my Windows kernel; I'm not about to start using it and open my computer up to being compromised.
"Swiss cheese into your Windows kernel?" Where did you hear this one?![]()
Originally posted by: check
but you know you could just be a dick about it... that's really helpful afterall
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
Originally posted by: clamum
I left Firefox for Opera a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Opera.
I left Firefox for Internet Explorer a few years ago and haven't been back to it. I :heart: Internet Explorer.