NYTimes story (may require free subscription)
It is looking like the Supreme Court will give the go-ahead to schools for testing anyone involved in optional activities (including things like choir, not just sports). In my opinion (and the article's, to a certain extent), it looks like eventually random drug testing could be extended to all students. It already has been in some states.
As for my opinion on the matter, I say "No". While I cannot deny that these tests may reduce drug use, you could make the argument for a lot of other practices that I would consider an invasion of their privacy.
What do you think?
It is looking like the Supreme Court will give the go-ahead to schools for testing anyone involved in optional activities (including things like choir, not just sports). In my opinion (and the article's, to a certain extent), it looks like eventually random drug testing could be extended to all students. It already has been in some states.
As for my opinion on the matter, I say "No". While I cannot deny that these tests may reduce drug use, you could make the argument for a lot of other practices that I would consider an invasion of their privacy.
What do you think?
