Earth 'entering new extinction phase' - US study

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,253
11,395
136
You fuck shit up, and go in the debt doing it.

You are so fucked up, that this is why Civilizations end.

Government.

-John


So if you'd like to explain how to have a lasting civilisation with no form of government Id be willing to listen.

Also how youd stop any members of that civilisation from forming a company that rapes the environment in any way it chooses.

If you could explain that without multiple consecutive posts it would be nice as well.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
the usual alarmist rhetoric from the liberal cooling / warming sky is falling cabal. Designed to incite mass hysteria to assure they can keep stealing revenue from the tax payer under the guise of "grants" so they can study nothing endlessly. Mass delusion at it's finest.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
the usual alarmist rhetoric from the liberal cooling / warming sky is falling cabal. Designed to incite mass hysteria to assure they can keep stealing revenue from the tax payer under the guise of "grants" so they can study nothing endlessly. Mass delusion at it's finest.


Fuck I hate anti-science people. You are the worst humans on the planet.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
Fuck I hate anti-science people. You are the worst humans on the planet.



..and then there are the out and out FOOLS that think this is real science. Further evidence that idiots will always be part of the social construct.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
..and then there are the out and out FOOLS that think this is real science. Further evidence that idiots will always be part of the social construct.


ok so you see value in some science at least. At anyrate you will probably be dead within 10 years and will never have to deal with any of the crap you spew is false. Must be nice to go to your death bed knowing you are right? :biggrin:
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,253
11,395
136
the usual alarmist rhetoric from the liberal cooling / warming sky is falling cabal. Designed to incite mass hysteria to assure they can keep stealing revenue from the tax payer under the guise of "grants" so they can study nothing endlessly. Mass delusion at it's finest.
Yeah. If all they wanted was cash they'd be starving if they relied on the oil companies to fund sympathetic research. :rolleyes:
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
That would be good. Right now we are looking at a major nuke accident every 50 years that has an effect of 20k or more years. If we could stretch the accident rate out a bit it would be nice.

With passive cooling that nuclear accident rate might not be concerning at all.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
...or brown with American pollution coming north. :( Not that we're totally blameless either, particularly in the last 25 years. *sigh*

Mark my words, global poisoning will kill the human race long before any man-made climate change will. (Short of a nuclear winter, that is!)
Could be, especially with our tendency to ship production where it can be accomplished without all those pesky environmental regulations.

Liberals care more about bees than People!

And jobs!
Only because people are breeding like rats whereas bees are stressed.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
That would be good. Right now we are looking at a major nuke accident every 50 years that has an effect of 20k or more years. If we could stretch the accident rate out a bit it would be nice.

BTW, Chernobyl isn't "over"... the initial sarcophagus is falling into disrepair and the replacement unit was never finished. The plant itself is still a massively-radioactive slag pile. :(

The solution they gave it was better than a cheap Fukushima "band-aid" but it's almost impossible to fix so it's either tack on another temporary solution and wait another 20 years or spend astronomical money to fix it for 50-100 years instead of only ~20-25.

Fukushima's "meh, gazillion holding tanks plus quietly dump it in the ocean" approach depresses me to no end.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,902
10,234
136
Modern designs and Thorium should be far safer than any plant in existence today.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Could be, especially with our tendency to ship production where it can be accomplished without all those pesky environmental regulations.

Gawd it's awful... those places willing to do the work must not care about its land or citizens at all. They're some of the filthiest places on Earth. I don't blame the locals who were born to their poverty, that'd be foolish.

Corporate bigwigs should not be able to pull this crap on anyone's soil, foreign OR domestic. Y'know... like if they face the choice of dumping their toxic waste in the ocean for a $1M fine + PR scandal IF caught, vs. $10M in cleanup - they're almost BOUND by shareholders to take the cheaper route.

Profit above all. Period.

*sigh* ...so bloody depressing...

Only because people are breeding like rats whereas bees are stressed.
While some groups are certainly breeding much, much faster than others - it certainly needs to be slowed. Perhaps the "Long Peace" has its disadvantages after all. :(

The civilized nations have all slowed their birth rates (for one reason or another.) Pity a couple large groups out there want to control the planet by way of sheer numbers... long-term worries of killing off ~75% of the world population from overpopulation issues doesn't seem to enter the game-plan.

We're still little better than hairless monkeys who've come up with a few clever gadgets along the way... still hopelessly enslaved to emotion and instinct.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Modern designs and Thorium should be far safer than any plant in existence today.

Hey, I'm all for new technology that's cleaner, better, more gooder-er. ;) I remember reading about large-scale energy storage which would be awesome! Correct the biggest flaw in all of our energy system - what isn't used immediately is lost forever.

Pity some of those corporate bigwigs I mentioned earlier have a vested interest in CURRENT technology, thus will stifle advancement to maximize profits.

*sigh* Okay... that's enough downers for one day. Headin' for the tub. ;)

tumblr_ma4c49EhYC1qa5pjpo1_1280.png
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Gawd it's awful... those places willing to do the work must not care about its land or citizens at all. They're some of the filthiest places on Earth. I don't blame the locals who were born to their poverty, that'd be foolish.

Corporate bigwigs should not be able to pull this crap on anyone's soil, foreign OR domestic. Y'know... like if they face the choice of dumping their toxic waste in the ocean for a $1M fine + PR scandal IF caught, vs. $10M in cleanup - they're almost BOUND by shareholders to take the cheaper route.

Profit above all. Period.

*sigh* ...so bloody depressing...


While some groups are certainly breeding much, much faster than others - it certainly needs to be slowed. Perhaps the "Long Peace" has its disadvantages after all. :(

The civilized nations have all slowed their birth rates (for one reason or another.) Pity a couple large groups out there want to control the planet by way of sheer numbers... long-term worries of killing off ~75% of the world population from overpopulation issues doesn't seem to enter the game-plan.

We're still little better than hairless monkeys who've come up with a few clever gadgets along the way... still hopelessly enslaved to emotion and instinct.
I think the bolded for most third world nations isn't quite fair. There are isolated instances such as Red China and the Soviet Union where it's a conscious decision to trade pollution in return for building raw might, but there's a lot to be said (including in China) for keeping one's belly full and one's children growing rather than starving. Environmental protection is a luxury in mankind's existence, and many nations haven't had sufficient free markets to afford that luxury. If slash & burn & move on is all one can afford, that's what one will do. That is true for every people, race, culture, nation and whatever semi-arbitrary classification we can make.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
No crisis equals no funding. I don’t think you have to be a genius to see that rather obvious fact. You have to be very naive to believe that the huge cash cow of Government funding is not influencing the “scientists”.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
They have been deliberately conservative – they’re well aware of the dangers of crying wolf on a topic of such importance, and where passions run so high. For a start, they limit themselves to the best-studied group of organisms, the vertebrates. Then, they take a high estimate of background extinctions to compare with, to make the modern figures as undramatic as possible. And then, they either consider only those animals known to be extinct (the “highly conservative” scenario), or they add in those extinctions in the wild that are likely to have happened, but are not yet verified.

Rolling on the floor laughing my fucking ass off.

They really really aren't crying wolf! They are being conservative! Just like when they pimped the population bomb that would kill off humanity in the 70s! Just like when they pimped the end of oil in 60s. Just like when they pimped a new global ice age in the 70s. etc... etc..... NOT ONE SINGLE HORROR PREDICTED EVER CAME TRUE..... NOT A SINGLE FUCKING ONE. I lived through this shit when I was kid, back when I still believed these fucktards and it scared the shit out of me. In exactly the same way that Hell scared the shit out of me. I finally grew up and realized it was all fucking religion.

Can we please create a new branch of science? We can put all these end of days fuck nuts who have polluted the field into it. Then we can all know to ignore them as they make yet another completely failed prediction of horror beyond comprehension.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/21/mass-extinction-science-warning


Is the theory testable? Is it predictive? Not really, it has as much value as what I flushed down the toilet this morning.
 
Last edited:

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
And Paul Ehrlich participated in this "study"..a notorious fraud and perpetrator of eco-KOOK alarmist propaganda designed to encourage mass hysteria.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Hey, I'm all for new technology that's cleaner, better, more gooder-er. ;) I remember reading about large-scale energy storage which would be awesome! Correct the biggest flaw in all of our energy system - what isn't used immediately is lost forever.

Pity some of those corporate bigwigs I mentioned earlier have a vested interest in CURRENT technology, thus will stifle advancement to maximize profits.

*sigh* Okay... that's enough downers for one day. Headin' for the tub. ;)

tumblr_ma4c49EhYC1qa5pjpo1_1280.png

I love, just freaking love Bloom County.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
So if you'd like to explain how to have a lasting civilisation with no form of government Id be willing to listen.

Also how youd stop any members of that civilisation from forming a company that rapes the environment in any way it chooses.

If you could explain that without multiple consecutive posts it would be nice as well.
If Goverment was limited, we'd have a chance. Our country has thrived for 200 years with limited Government.

Today we have Government run amok. They steal from people, kill people, are corrupt, and expensive.

There are no limits on Government today, when our Constitution and Bill of Rights feared Government.

-John
 

Exophase

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2012
4,439
9
81
Sure makes all of the normal problems we talk about seem small in comparison.

Does anyone have any links to more positive commentary? If not a different conclusion then at least some hope that it's not too late for some kind of change to help.