So people were freer awhile ago even though lots of them were in literal slavery?If Goverment was limited, we'd have a chance. Our country has thrived for 200 years with limited Government.
Today we have Government run amok. They steal from people, kill people, are corrupt, and expensive.
There are no limits on Government today, when our Constitution and Bill of Rights feared Government.
-John
So people were freer awhile ago even though lots of them were in literal slavery?
Yes, the apex of American "freedom" occurred in 1798 when our then very small and limited government passed a law which made any criticism of the POTUS or Congress a crime punishable by imprisonment. That's how much "freer" we were with "limited government."
Our industrial terraforming and destruction of natural habitats is largely responsible for the observed changes. We may even be indirectly responsible for the rise of the parasite that's killing off honeybees.
If we simply stopped immigration into our country, our population would level off and slightly decline. That's a step in the right direction, is it not? I think you know how "agreeable" (or not) that proposal is.
Has anyone even considered what specific effects this extinction phase will have on women and minorities?
Good questions. We live in complicated times for sure. Perhaps a government commission could get to the bottom of these questions, or perhaps we should consider how imminent the danger is and jump right to the solution by instituting an extinction tax.It depends: Do you consider the effect on men who pretend to be women or actual women? What about white women who pretend to be black women? You need to consider all factors for this extinction event. When the sky is falling, we need to make it fall hard if anyone is going to believe it.
Just researched him a tad. He predicted that in the seventies mass starvation would occur due to overpopulation.And Paul Ehrlich participated in this "study"..a notorious fraud and perpetrator of eco-KOOK alarmist propaganda designed to encourage mass hysteria.
It depends: Do you consider the effect on men who pretend to be women or actual women? What about white women who pretend to be black women? You need to consider all factors for this extinction event. When the sky is falling, we need to make it fall hard if anyone is going to believe it.
...provided nothing - ab-so-loot-lee NOTHING goes wrong. Otherwise, the "clean" aspect becomes "toxic nightmare".
...and don't knock over those waste barrels over there. And over there. And down there. :whiste:
![]()
Personal: White man who wants to be a black woman seeking other white men for lesbian interracial sex before the SUV apocalypse kills the planet. No smokers. Fellow PhD required. Must be into BDSM gangbangs and genital piercings.
http://www.theguardian.com/environm...p/26/maldives-test-case-climate-change-action
Poor Maldives, being destroyed by global warming and pollution.
http://www.sun.mv/english/4224
Oh that is cool, they must have discovered a new form of jet that doesn't cause pollution.
LMAO! I about spit out the last bite of my lunch when I read that last line!Personal: White man who wants to be a black woman seeking other white men for lesbian interracial sex before the SUV apocalypse kills the planet. No smokers. Fellow PhD preferred.
Local pollution does not cause local sea level rise. World pollution does cause world sea level rise. Pollution does not directly cause the level of the sea to rise. Pollution melts ice around the world which flows into the seas and thus that is how pollution is causing sea level rise.
Are you trying to say that adding 5 more airports, and the jet traffic to support them, doesn't increase world pollution?
No it does.
Although I would like to see what the total pollution of transportation in the Maldives is compared to the rest of all world pollution.
And more or less they might realize that the rest of the world is probably not going to give much of a fuck and only keep increasing pollution so they might as well make some money while they can.
The threat to human health from climate change is so great that it could undermine the last 50 years of gains in development and global health, experts warned on Tuesday.
lolLMAO! I about spit out the last bite of my lunch when I read that last line!
This is the thing that doesn't make sense. If global warming is settled, and sea levels are going to rise, the smart guy would be investing in an area that is currently cheap because it's too cold and too far from the water. There are plenty of places in the northern US or Canada which fit into those categories, and land is still dirt cheap.
The environmentalist fanatics who are so positive that the earth is going to go up 10F in the next 5 years and water levels are going to go up 5' just love to tell us how we must spend our money to save the world, yet they don't invest a single penny of their own money in what should be a sure-win. Instead they build more airports on an island they claimed is doomed already. Makes sense? I don't get it.
