VirtualLarry
No Lifer
He's got a "crappy" 1.325v VID, I have a "better" 1.2625v VID. It still doesn't make sense to me, but I'll go with it.
You know, I just thought of something. Perhaps we have the whole "low VID = high overclock" thing exactly BACKWARDS.
Perhaps the chips that have high leakage (poor chips), have a low VID, and chips that have low leakage (good chips), have a higher VID?
You know, I just thought of something. Perhaps we have the whole "low VID = high overclock" thing exactly BACKWARDS.
Perhaps the chips that have high leakage (poor chips), have a low VID, and chips that have low leakage (good chips), have a higher VID?