Originally posted by: wishfool
Seems sensible to take the plunge but I don't want to build a computer that can't play the games I currently want to play and force myself to wait an extra 2 months or so for Penryn and extra money. Either way about it, I'm probably gonna jump on the e2180 soon.
Hi wishfool. My bias aside (see sig), I'd go E2160 or E2180 and OC the snot out of it, then sell it later this year and drop in a Penryn when they become mainstream and cheaper. That is exactly what my plan was when I put together my PC last month. Saving $100 over the E6750 will allow you to buy a better video card which is the smarter move anyway.
The E2160 has a default 9x multiplier while the E2180 has a 10x multiplier. Obviously, you'll have downward access to the other multis (i.e. 6 - 9, and 6 - 10 respectively) via your bios. But you'll do most of your OCing with the FSB. When I built my system, I installed the OS, then made sure it was stable at stock speeds by running memtest86, along with Orthos for 3 hrs.
After two days of web surfing, etc and general break in, I started my OCing. Kind of knowing (after reading) what these chips were capable of, I went straight to 290 FSB on stock vcore no problem. After that, I increased FSB 5 clicks at a time, Orthos testing at each point. I have a very average chip -- absolutely nothing special here. Needed a bit more vcore than others in this thread to achieve my final setting of 3.25ghz. I had it up to 3.3ghz but Orthos small FFT test got it too hot for my taste even with my Tuniq + 4 case fans.
Anyway, this setup is plenty fast. I play COD4 @ 1280 x 1024 with everything maxed and get 65 FPS on the most detailed/closed quarters boards, and 85 - 91 FPS on most every other board. Is that fast enough for you?