Originally posted by: Cerb
It's a new game, and the original poster wants to be able to play it with decent quality settings. What part of that escapes you? Budget and brand new games don't go together.
Everyone's been using a 9800 Pro as video card to add, given the bang/buck.
$650 is what, $50 more than that Dell with a plain 9600 video card?
Did I say anything about changing the mobo? No.
Lastly, if he wants to play Doom3 at any decent framerate, he'll need a better video card and more RAM. Any game out now needs more than Anand's budget system to run current games beyond low detail settings.
No, you didn't say to change the motherboard but you said to get a 2500+ and suggested that it would somehow allow for incremental upgrades (which doesn't make sense.) You can't just add faster components because they're faster. They're also more expensive. That's why it's called a budget system.
Anandtech's budget system will easily run doom 3 at 1024x768 full detail. Hell mine, which is slightly slower, can run the alpha nearly fine (2 years before launch build) All of these people who think that yesterday's cutting edge technology won't run today's games are fools. Anandtech's budget system was really hot not that long ago. People around here seem to have this phobia about anything that's not absolutely cutting edge and think that it's suddenly been rendered completely useless.
The people who buy systems like these are the people that game designers target. The mass market. It's all about making a profit for them. They have to sell games to the masses to do that. The masses have systems like this. Take a look at the system requirements. Take a look at anandtech's budget system. It will run it just fine. If the alpha runs just fine on it, the final release will run spectacularly.