Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
maybe one needs to die so the other two can live,or simply cut down on the different brands under gm and them have, too many. dump stuff like buick, waste of resources to develop for.
they've been catering to the truck/suv crowd for too long, alienated the other customers who don't like the hick thing and well now they are pretty much stuck with those customers.
I don't think cutting anything is smart to do. Where are all of the Buick fans going to go? Don't they generally cater to middle-agers and older folks who just want pseudo-luxury, smooth ride, V6, and an auto? If their Buick dries up and goes away, where are they going to go? Chevrolet? Saturn? Maybe... to a Camry?
Yeah, that sounds smart.
I agree that it seems logical to cut down the company, cut expenses, cut waste--including wasteful brands--but it's not that simple. It's like the people who think Ford should kill off Mercury. Yeah, it makes sense in a way. But why? If they can take a Ford vehicle, tart it up for a couple of bucks, and sell it to a separate demographic for a pretty decent profit overall, why kill that off? It's not like all of those Mercury drivers are just going to shrug it off and make their next purchase a Ford instead. Many of them will just take their business somewhere else. Not to mention that bitterness of feeling dropped by your company.
Though I would think Pontiac should be the brand to be dropped, if any. Though the Solstice and the G8 are finally putting giving them some traction, they've just been a brand of GM rebadges--some being outright terrible, like a Pontiac minivan, FWD SUV, and FWD hatchback, all they needed was a rebadged pickup--but they're supposed to be the "sporty" and/or "passionate" division.
Oooh, but
that Equinox has
red gauges. Hawt.
I don't really get the point about the Hybrids, either. It's just my opinion, but it certainly doesn't seem like hybrids have really been taking off. But then again, I can't even remember the last time I saw a Prius here in Virginia, besides the two that have been collecting dust at the local Toyota dealership. I can't say anything about the Camry hybrids. I don't tend to notice many new Camry's either, and I'm rarely in a position to see one up close to see if it's a hybrid or not. Obviously they're not as distinct as the Prius. GM has them coming, Ford--I think--has more coming. It'll just get people to stop complaining that they don't have them. Then we'll just get to hear everybody ranting and raving about how the new Toyota gets an EPA figure of 100mpg (60mpg real world) while the domestic hybrids only get 60 (40 real world.)*
But as for the truck/SUV sales argument that I saw, I don't see why that's so bad either. They sell more pickups and SUV's than they do
anything else. That's their last solid foothold. The domestics lost subcompacts, compacts, midsized, fullsized, minivans, and crossovers. They can still move an Explorer/Tahoe or Silverado/F150, so why yell at them for it? Do people actually think they should
cut budgets there? Transfer the savings into the budget for the Malibu or Taurus/500? Cars which nobody is buying, nobody is interested in, and they probably couldn't sell in decent numbers if it were in fact the greatest pair of sedans of all time? That's good. Then we can can watch them tumble and die in the car segment, then watch their trucks and SUV's get overwhelmed by the competition, who are already so hot on their heels there that they really just need time more than anything else to pump up their sales and deflate the domestics.
* Hypothetical, imaginary numbers.