• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you see Acura and Lexus in the same class?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: maddogchen
My parents feel that Lexus is way better than Acura.

But I don't feel like it justifies the huge cost difference. An Acura TL costs $32,000 while a Lexus IS350 costs $40,000. A Lexus is not $8000 better than an Acura IMHO

😕

Acura TL base price: $33,625
Acura TL Type-S base price: $38,125
Lexus IS350 base price: $35,705

when I was looking at Edmunds last november, they were getting deals on Acura TL 2006 with Nav for 32,000 +TTL but for Lexus IS350 with Navi 2006 you were looking at $40,000 because of stupid packages.
 
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: maddogchen
My parents feel that Lexus is way better than Acura.

But I don't feel like it justifies the huge cost difference. An Acura TL costs $32,000 while a Lexus IS350 costs $40,000. A Lexus is not $8000 better than an Acura IMHO

😕

Acura TL base price: $33,625
Acura TL Type-S base price: $38,125
Lexus IS350 base price: $35,705

Yeah, now go price an IS350 with premium package, navigation, and premium sound. The most expensive OPTION package they offer is like $11,000. The TL Type S comes with Navigation standard. I guarantee the base 350 doesn't have all the options that a Type S does. But, this is obviously an argument that is going nowhere, some people will always believe that Car X > Car Y, no matter what. I guess it doesn't really matter to me, since I've over my (brief) Lexus kick.
 
Well as far as dealers go, there are bad and good for both.
Case in point,
Went to a Lexus dealer, sat down, said we wanted an IS. Guy says "name a price". We name a price and he shakes our hands and says goodbye, no need to waste anybody's time.
While we are driving out of the lot he runs out in front of us and basically pleads his case that NO one would sell it to us at that price and offered a slightly lower price...well we went to another dealer and got a better price from a dealer who treated us like human beings.

There, good and bad from Lexus.
 
TSX vs. ?
TL > ES
RL > GS
MDX > RX
? vs. GX
? vs. IS
? vs. LS

For the classes in which they compete, Acura is all over Lexus, but they don't cover all the same ground.
 
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: maddogchen
My parents feel that Lexus is way better than Acura.

But I don't feel like it justifies the huge cost difference. An Acura TL costs $32,000 while a Lexus IS350 costs $40,000. A Lexus is not $8000 better than an Acura IMHO

😕

Acura TL base price: $33,625
Acura TL Type-S base price: $38,125
Lexus IS350 base price: $35,705

try putting some options on that base 350 and see what you come up with...the TL is fairly loaded for a base model...
 
Originally posted by: dds14u
Lexus is more luxury and Acura is more about performance.
Lexus interiors are much more refined than Acura interiors.
With Acura you usually get a cheaper price for the same performance.

My personal views
Luxury Flagship
LS > RL (Price diff exists)

Sporty Midsize
GS > TL (Price diff exists)

Smaller Sports Sedan
IS >= TL,TSX (IS ~ TL in price)

However, I do feel that Acura has more of an edge in the SUV dept (RDX/MDX) Although it's hard to beat the RX...you see so many of them for a reason.

I always thought the ES was supposed to face off with the TL. The RL is supposed to match the GS. It's more of price comparison.
 
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: dds14u
Lexus is more luxury and Acura is more about performance.
Lexus interiors are much more refined than Acura interiors.
With Acura you usually get a cheaper price for the same performance.

My personal views
Luxury Flagship
LS > RL (Price diff exists)

Sporty Midsize
GS > TL (Price diff exists)

Smaller Sports Sedan
IS >= TL,TSX (IS ~ TL in price)

However, I do feel that Acura has more of an edge in the SUV dept (RDX/MDX) Although it's hard to beat the RX...you see so many of them for a reason.

I always thought the ES was supposed to face off with the TL. The RL is supposed to match the GS. It's more of price comparison.

Maybe price-wise, but the target crowd for the ES doesn't have a great amount of overlap with that of the TL.
 
To me they are both same/similar, both of them are "upper scale/more expensive" vehicles from Toyota and Honda. But I like the MDX body styling better than RX.

The perception is Lexus > Acura. Good job from Lexus marketing machine.
 
They definitely appeal to different people. Having owned several Integra's, and helped work on several cheapo Integra's, I will say they are well constructed cars. Nowhere near the cruising ability of a RWD Lexus V8, or even the GS300 with it's I6. (Probably has higher displacement by now, but I am only speaking of the ones I have driven).

 
Lexus has just recently surpassed the near-luxury level of Acura and is now on a level of their own between near-luxury and premium luxury (mbz, bmw).
 
This is nothing new - Acura is aware of it's tweener image. Expect Acura to start moving up though - they're weening their lineup away from FWD vehicles, in favor of Honda's SH-AWD. Gone is the RSX, which has been replaced by Honda's Civic Si. The next generation NSX is just around the corner, with a V10. The redesigned TSX comes out this fall, the new TL will arrive next year. I'd say they're competing more with Audi than Lexus, positioning themselves as a sporty luxury manufacturer.

Now, if they could just provide a true luxury flagship sedan like the LS, or the A8, instead of the RL..........
 
I own an acura and i agree.. Lexus just have been putting out really good cars.. compared to acura...

but i do find some of these lexus looks too big for me to drive..
 
Originally posted by: Ryan
Now, if they could just provide a true luxury flagship sedan like the LS, or the A8, instead of the RL..........

While I agree that an even better luxury flagship would be a welcome addition to the Acura line, my parents just bought an RL, and it is easily one of the best sedans out there (even compared to the LS and A8).
 
Originally posted by: isekii
Originally posted by: vetteguy
Sigh...at least Acura makes cars that don't look exactly like the car they're based on. Park a Lexus ES and a Toyota Camry next to each other and then tell me you can justify the extra $15,000. Plus, I despise the snob image Lexus has tried so hard to build for themselves. Just going into a dealership makes me sick. I was poking around the lot the other day looking at IS 250s and IS 350s and the sales guy started telling me about how "no one wants a RWD sports sedan" and then looked at my Audi and said how these cars (Lexus) were 'probably a little out my league'. Yeah, so out of my league that now I'm going to get an Acura, ass.

I call shens.
Dealers are there to sell cars, not drive sales away.

Missed this one the first time through:

1. Salespeople do not like wasting their time on someone they perceive will not/cannot buy a car.
2. Salespeople are not necessarily the smartest people in the world (most of them do not seem to have masters degrees, from my informal poll 😉 ) and, thus, sometimes say the dumbest things.

MotionMan
 
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: Ryan
Now, if they could just provide a true luxury flagship sedan like the LS, or the A8, instead of the RL..........

While I agree that an even better luxury flagship would be a welcome addition to the Acura line, my parents just bought an RL, and it is easily one of the best sedans out there (even compared to the LS and A8).

I agree - the RL is a fantastic vehicle. It's powerful, has excellent handling, has excellent materials/fit and finish, and is jammed packed with technology - but it lacks in perception and presence, which, unfortunately, sells luxury cars.

Hell - if I were on the market, I would definitely consider one.
 
Originally posted by: zixxer
Acura's make nice teenie bopper cars... and nerd wanna-be's w/ their bluetooth.

'ey! I like my bluetooth in my Nissan.

Originally posted by: her209
I choose Lexus because its easier for Asians to pronounce.

Lexus is harder for Asians to pronounce 😛. There is no 'L' or 'X' in Japanese as they're changed to 'R' and 'KS'. Not to mention two constants in a row are never pronounced like that as you add a subtle 'u' into it.

The idea of luxury cars is also very dependent on what society as a whole sees as luxury. Acura had the NSX in America (they were Honda branded in Japan since I believe Acura didn't exist in Japan for the longest time) but I'd say the price tag kept them from widespread adoption. So really, what does Acura have that helps define them as luxury? Not much and that's why people don't consider them as luxury, because the idea of luxury is defined by everyone else. That's why even though my Nissan Altima 3.5SL has pretty much all the features of a luxury car, no one would consider it luxury

Originally posted by: isekii
I call shens.
Dealers are there to sell cars, not drive sales away.

Those may not have been the exact words, but a pompous salesman may not want to "waste his time" on a buyer that won't go through. Although, personally I think Audi is a lot higher than Lexus... especially the new R8 :Q.
 
Having driven most of the high end lexus models and owning an Acura TL, I'd say the Acura's are nicer if you still enjoy the thrill of driving, while the Lexus has better name branding. Lexus sounds better, but after driving and comparing features, I opted for the TL over the IS. Both very nice vehicles though.
 
Back
Top